Those trying to keep it as a "natural dirt trail" are just trying to restrict access to limit the user count so they can enjoy it for themselves. Selfish NIMBYism at its best.
We need more access for safe, comfortable non-motorized transportation in this state. If you're arguing against...
Cabinets to the ceiling paired with high ceilings are fabulously useful. Yes, you need a stool to get stuff out of them, but it's a great place to stash infrequently needed stuff.
First of all, great pictures! But if you're posting photos taken in portrait, they're much more viewable if you shrink them down. The forum software automatically expands them to the width of the browser window, which is usually in a landscape ratio. Here's what I see with your posts:
For those that post pictures taken in portrait orientation, they're much more viewable if you grab a corner and resize them down in the reply box before you post. If you just let them max out they end up filling the width of a landscape monitor, and thus require viewers to scroll two times (or...
How would that be enforceable? A person that tapped on the train or entered in a faregate station would not have a paper receipt. So if you don't pay you could just claim to have tapped in elsewhere. Without an online system they could not verify that claim.
DCR should be stripped of all responsibility for roads except for those who's primary function (key word here) is park access. The primary function of the river roads, Fellsway, Arborway, etc etc is not park access.
Your feelings about casinos are coloring your opinions of the bridge. The alignment is dead on the desire line for a continuation of the path while minimizing crossing distance.
And again, this design is at concept level right now. If it needs to change for the purpose of future proofing...