Dock Square Parking Garage | 20 Clinton Street | Downtown

This would look well placed here, and would do a very good job blending the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries together.
 
Per UHub, construction in 2020:


NPC:


1599752701022.png


1599753315423.png


1599753345757.png

1599753374772.png
 
Last edited:
This NPC sort of concerns me. I'm not sure what sort of negotiations took place with the various groups, but the building size is constant, yet there is a reduction in units by 75 (209 to 134, about 35%). In the midst of a housing shortage, won't this just make the per unit cost at least 35% more expensive than they would have been originally? (unit size changes aside). They don't elaborate on "why" they are making changes.
 
Once again, too much of the terracotta / red palette to appease "Boston" sensibilities. This isn't a 5 story walkup row house!
 
Once again, too much of the terracotta / red palette to appease "Boston" sensibilities. This isn't a 5 story walkup row house!
Have you thought about why there is a red palette in boston and why it seems to work well/alot of people use it? I know it may not feel that way right now, but Boston is a very dreary city. It is one of the rainiest cities in America and, compared to many of the other major cities, winters are tough and particularly grey. The classical red and green color palette of the city plays against and pops off of the grey skies and grey slush to help keep the city feeling vibrant even on the dreariest of winter days. I dont know the last time you walked through midtown Manhattan in the winter but it is soul crushing. All that grey just puts you in a funk that is hard to shake. The red palette, and yellows and greens, classically found in the city, helps break up the monotony of the winter months and rainy days and pulls your eyes to the warmth of the buildings instead of the cold you are physically feeling.
 
Have you thought about why there is a red palette in boston and why it seems to work well/alot of people use it? I know it may not feel that way right now, but Boston is a very dreary city. It is one of the rainiest cities in America and, compared to many of the other major cities, winters are tough and particularly grey. The classical red and green color palette of the city plays against and pops off of the grey skies and grey slush to help keep the city feeling vibrant even on the dreariest of winter days. I dont know the last time you walked through midtown Manhattan in the winter but it is soul crushing. All that grey just puts you in a funk that is hard to shake. The red palette, and yellows and greens, classically found in the city, helps break up the monotony of the winter months and rainy days and pulls your eyes to the warmth of the buildings instead of the cold you are physically feeling.
I agree --- but it's an argument for Scandinavian style _brighter_ colors like are frequently NIMBY'd. More bright Victorians, JP style pls.
 
I agree --- but it's an argument for Scandinavian style _brighter_ colors like are frequently NIMBY'd. More bright Victorians, JP style pls.
This is the alternative that is needed more.

I am certainly not advocating for gray and glass. And one would have thought we got over the sea of red approach after the debacle that was the Aztec temple in the red desert (AKA City Hall).
 
I agree --- but it's an argument for Scandinavian style _brighter_ colors like are frequently NIMBY'd. More bright Victorians, JP style pls.
Those colors are fine and wonderful but need massive amounts of upkeep with either regular repainting or panel replacement when the pigments fade. The only vivid colors that building materials naturally come in are red, brick or terracotta, and green, patinated copper. That's why those are the go to colors for the city and help it feel like a designed whole.

EDIT: you can also get a fairly bright yellow naturally with brick but it still always feels like a neutral compared to the red and green mentioned above.
 
I question if this project is financeable given To massive cutbacks in condo construction lending in Covid Era. Especially high end condos in CBd.
 
This is all right, but the original version was significantly better.
"There has been a reduction in residential units from 209 to 134, with none of 27 affordable units being eliminated. This change in unit composition means the total number of affordable units preserved has increased to 20% from the previous 13% preserved for affordability.

According to the project team, while previous plans were to potentially demolish the sixth floor and insert stackers on the fifth floor, the decision not to do so was based on both economic and environmental factors, specifically wanting to avoid excess debris in landfills."


1602167488811.png
 
"There has been a reduction in residential units from 209 to 134, with none of 27 affordable units being eliminated. This change in unit composition means the total number of affordable units preserved has increased to 20% from the previous 13% preserved for affordability.

According to the project team, while previous plans were to potentially demolish the sixth floor and insert stackers on the fifth floor, the decision not to do so was based on both economic and environmental factors, specifically wanting to avoid excess debris in landfills."


View attachment 7678
The other thing that is striking in the change is the upgrade in apparent unit size.

Unit count went from 236 to 161, but Residential GFA went up from 243,000 to 256,000 sf!

Either they have added in a ton of large sf residential amenities, or the units got a lot bigger (1030 sf/unit to 1590 sf/unit gross allocation).
 
The other thing that is striking in the change is the upgrade in apparent unit size.

Unit count went from 236 to 161, but Residential GFA went up from 243,000 to 256,000 sf!

Either they have added in a ton of large sf residential amenities, or the units got a lot bigger (1030 sf/unit to 1590 sf/unit gross allocation).

Based on the language in the NPC, I think the units got bigger. They simply note the increase in square footage was due to 'a reconfiguration of the floors,' which is vague and confusing to me. I don't think GFA should increase that much with that...


Overall, I think this is yet another one of those projects that is going to come down to the material quality. I have some hopes from the renders, but the metal portion is a little concerning. Not sure if it's the angle and the rendering engine having a hard time (metal is sometimes tricky in photo-real rendering), but the matte finish on the metal isn't what I would have gone with.

1602169676872.png
 
"There has been a reduction in residential units from 209 to 134, with none of 27 affordable units being eliminated. This change in unit composition means the total number of affordable units preserved has increased to 20% from the previous 13% preserved for affordability.

According to the project team, while previous plans were to potentially demolish the sixth floor and insert stackers on the fifth floor, the decision not to do so was based on both economic and environmental factors, specifically wanting to avoid excess debris in landfills."


View attachment 7678

Pretty disappointing they slashed the units significantly but the parking remained completely unchanged.
 

Back
Top