I drove by this last night and what stood out to me was that all the floors still had the construction lighting. Does anybody know when this is actually supposed to open? I guess I just assumed it was closer to done since it's been externally completed for months.
This makes sense for office floors if no tenants have been signed up. The only place where the developer would probably spend money would be the elevator lobbies, if their intent is to demise floor plates into multiple tenants. Otherwise they will leave construction lighting in a "dark shell" until a tenant begins their build-out.I drove by this last night and what stood out to me was that all the floors still had the construction lighting. Does anybody know when this is actually supposed to open? I guess I just assumed it was closer to done since it's been externally completed for months.
“The project continues to be in active competition and negotiations for a potential tenant for approximately one-third of the building, and that process is now expected to continue, likely to mid-year,” the bank’s fourth quarter report states.
I agree this was a "peak boom" mentality project, but I don't think it's a strange location at all. The strong trend these developers were no doubt aware of preceding this was that the corridor between Kendall and Lechmere was becoming increasingly developed with large workplaces. You had/have the former CarGurus hq, Pegasystems, Flagship Pioneering, and then a wave of large labs, like Alexandria's conversion projects along First street, the Breakthrough lab bldg on 1st, and the massive lab square footage all around Cambridgeside (which itself is facing vacancy challenges). Then on the other side only a couple blocks away you had Lechmere and the redevelopment surrounding it. Yes, it is a (mere) block away from the main corridor itself, but it's in a longtime cluster of government buildings that were always workplaces. My point is that it was not an unreasonable 'skate to where the puck is going' strategy given all the knowledge anyone could have had in 2018 when the current rendition was designed.Admittedly, I don't walk in this neighborhood much, but was down there rather recently.
This building is eerily empty. At the time, the leaves all over the place indicated 0 people have been there in weeks, I'm sure the snow is doing the same thing..
It may have worked if this opened at the peak of the building boom, but other than that, it's a bit of a strange location for all this.
Yeah, I think that's the way to view it: it'll move at a big discount to someone who's going to end up loving it. Cambridge was so overheated before the pandemic, it was due for a correction and, in all honesty, that's probably better in the long run provided things don't take too long to recover. Unfortunately for a few developers. the once-in-a-blue-moon confluence of factors you mention meant it was about as harsh of an inflection point as one could imagine.We're watching a number of trends collide here in real time, from once-cheap capital, to Cambridge exuberance, to pandemic effects. Class A is doing better in Boston, but there's still a ton of softness in the market. Someone is going to love this place at the right price, but there's going to be a bloodbath before then.