Nubian Sq. Parcel P-3 (nee Tremont Crossing) | Roxbury

A bit of local history has made the thread more interesting while we are all waiting for the big showdown between the City Council and the Mayor regarding her decision. Expect the reporting to rarely mention how much money it would save the city, focusing more on the drama and the rivalries
 
After the Bussey Bridge Disaster in 1887 there was enough widespread panic about the condition of numerous flimsy-construction bridges that the Boston & Providence RR (and later NYNH&H) for awhile made an ostentatious show of doing overbuilt stone railroad structures to restore public confidence in them. Most of the grade separations of the NEC through the old embankment were done by them in the immediate post-Bussey era and reflected those 'optics'.

Your post, though focusing on an appalling disaster, is also a great reminder of how many decades suburban commuters pre-dated what I assume is a general misconception of "oh, suburban commuting really only began post-1945." That Wiki page states that the unfortunate individuals taking that train, in 1887, were "commuters."

Realistically, based on the emergence of the Fitchburg Railroad and the Boston & Worcester Railroad, one would have to conclude wealthy suburbanites were commuting from Concord and Newton, respectively, to Boston's central business district, as early as 1850--nearly 60 years before the advent of the MBTA; certainly 60 years before widespread adoption of private automobile use.

Which is to say, as early as 1850, suburban commuter lifestyle/identity politics, development politics, and land-use patterns were already a serious "thing."
 
HYM held a public meeting on P3 at the Twelfth Baptist Church tonight (the event had originally been scheduled for the 2nd but was pushed back due to the snowstorm). Posting key takeaways here while they're fresh and without expressing my opinion.

- About 40-50 were in attendance. A good roster of local politicians were on hand, including City Councilors Miniard Culpepper and Ruthzee Louijeune (who didn't speak), State Senator Dianne Wilkerson, and former Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson (who did). A third city councilor (could have been Brian Worrell, but am not sure) showed up as the meeting was concluding. Many others were members of involved community organizations or activists.

- Zero people spoke in support or defense of the pivot of the site to being used by the school - everyone who spoke supported the previous commercial/economic development plan.

- On the Developer's side, Tom O'Brien (HYM) spoke, while Rev. Jeffrey Brown (MyCap) moderated and occasionally responded to questions.
  • O'Brien focused on P3's proximity to Longwood's medical facilities, prompting the proposed heavy life science usage which would in turn support the affordable housing component. Part of the development plan had endeavored to get the residences down to Roxbury's (as opposed to Boston's) AMI level. Later in response to a question, he conceded that the site probably couldn't get a Pfizer-type tenant in the current market (to paraphrase him, "because of the guy now in the White House") but that they could possibly land a hospital group instead.

- Armani White (Reclaim Roxbury) claims that the Roxbury Strategic Master Plan Oversight Committee (RSMPOC) hasn't been given a heads-up in the city's change of direction for the site, contrary to the RSMPOC's right to have a vote on what happens to any land parcels in the Nubian Square area. His group had sent an email to Kairos Shen (City Chief of Planning) and were planning to hold more meetings.

- Near the start of the meeting, author Karolyn Crockett had opened with a brief history of the site, in which she tied the fight to commercially develop it with the original drive to kill the Expressway project in the 1960s/70s. She characterized the proposed commercial use as a "settled" matter which the mayor was now attempting to re-litigate.

- A member of Friends of Madison Park gave a lengthy speech during the open comment period. According to him, the parcel now stood on by the police station on the other side of the street had originally been designated in 1983 to house a two-building free trade zone that would create 1,200-1,700 jobs. When the BPD ended up taking that land instead, it was with the understanding that P3 would be allowed to be developed commercially. He also complained about Northeastern's historic gobbling up of land sites.

- Dianne Wilkerson spoke next.
  • She started by discussing the background behind the formation of the Roxbury Strategic Master Plan/RSMPOC...by how Cellucci had gotten rid of the Department of Environment Management (DEM) in 1999; DEM at the time had 11 parcels that it wanted to give to the city, but this was opposed by certain groups as the city several nearby parcels already, unless a concrete process was made to allow for the community to form a plan on the disposition of said land.
  • She repeatedly said that the school shouldn't be allowed to encroach upon the P3 land, and that the city is required to put P3 out for development again now that the deed has been revoked.
  • She also brought up the Bartlett Station project as an example; the developer there had apparently wanted to provide a new home for the Conservativory Lab Charter School, but this was shot down by the community because that usage ran counter to the desired commercial development.
- Steven Godfrey (RSMPOC co-chair) claimed that negotiations were going on with the city by was light on details. He doesn't acknowledge that the 2003 designation has been removed and said that "We are in concert with you, we have not changed our position."

- Several people mentioned the investment that the developers and others had put in that was now down the drain. One reverend claimed that HYM had offered land to the school.

- At least two people mentioned the White Stadium redevelopment...they didn't have positive things to say about it.

- The entire meeting was very civil, but multiple people hurled invective at Wu. One claimed that she's anti-black and that she's an "angry Menino with a smile."

- Tania Fernandes Anderson was among the last to speak. Among some tongue-in-cheek jokes about having recently lost her job, she had among the harshest words about Wu, accusing her of duplicity in pretending that there was still a discussion to be had here when her team had in fact already made up their mind about the site and had "other developers in her ear." She also lobbed much friendlier criticism at Louijeune, in a sort of "we need to pressure her to come back into the fold every once in a while" way.

- Some quotes (maybe not exact-exact words):
  • "We don't need a school as much as we need economic development" -Bill Singleton
  • "Madison High School is about education, P3 is about economic development" -Friends of Madison Park guy
  • "It's not about what's right, it's about what's required" & "This is an economic development site" -Wilkerson
 
This whole thing is crazy to me. I'm obviously not in the weeds, but this project has gone NOWHERE for decades. The idea that it's just around the corner and all will be made right, finally, this time, just seems delusional. A lab building supposedly being at the center of this project, in this environment, just makes the advocates look like they're being taken for a ride.

I understand community input, I understand the desire to develop this space, but it's not the mayor's fault this has stalled out for as long as it has. Classic "100% of nothing" scenario. Credit to O'Brien for positioning himself as the local champion of the people here, even though he must know they aren't going to get lab tenants at that site, maybe even in a 2021 bull market.
 

Smart and her colleagues at OnyxGroup Development are saying in an open letter to the community that it’s time to walk away.

The residential development firm’s decision comes as another P-3 partner, Jeffrey Brown’s My City at Peace, is pushing ahead. Brown had planned to hold a listening session in Roxbury on Monday evening to galvanize support for the project. But as OnyxGroup notes in its letter, the “team is no longer on the same page” and advised Brown against holding the meeting.

[...]

Smart said it was disappointing for her and her OnyxGroup partners, Shabnam Mashmasarmi and Carlos Castillo, but also a sign to move on. Exploring a way for a new high school to contribute to the site’s development is a direction that should be pursued, they note, in part because it would bring significant state funds to the community.

[...]

Now, OnyxGroup will focus its attention on Walnut Knoll, a 200-unit affordable apartment complex for seniors in Foxborough that it’s developing with Peabody Cos. and the nonprofit Affordable Housing and Services Collaborative. The first two buildings opened a few months ago, and Smart said she hopes to close on a construction loan for the third building in a few weeks. OnyxGroup will still consider other projects in Roxbury, including any future opportunities that may arise at P-3.
 
The City totally whiffed here and made the scheme too baroque to succeed. By the time it was put out to bid again last cycle, it would easily have pencilled as market rate alone --- just run an auction for the site then and see who offers the best benefits! But instead, it had to be lab to subsidize massive amounts of affordable housing and other goodies that could not survive a change in the market. What a total waste.
 

Back
Top