New-build classical architecture (evoking old styles)

A tonsured monk running 3D CAD software to make water-cut stone facade pieces for their new build gothic cloister in Wyoming is an image from a fever dream or acid trip. Super cool though!
To me it's absolutely awesome, both the monks and the gothic cathedral that they're building. Been married almost 50 years with three great kids plus grandkids, but in another life being a monk would have been great. Good on 'em for building this!
 
Not as extreme as the East Wing nonsense but definitely still "evokes" older styles:
wek0p0otu369cvogkzpy.jpg

qjtd70rxahdfngzgm4kv.jpg

nhxeds8ulzzjc8tg70ok.jpg
 
I disagree, I think its grandeur is quite fitting for the location. I would expect nothing less from a stadium situated at the end of East Capitol St with a direct line of sight to the Capitol. This is DC, after all.
 
I disagree, I think its grandeur is quite fitting for the location. I would expect nothing less from a stadium situated at the end of East Capitol St with a direct line of sight to the Capitol. This is DC, after all.

Its location on a direct axis to the Capitol building, in addition to its grandiose style, makes it seem overpowering and out of scale. It this style of stadium were located in a suburb somewhere, it would fit in better.
 
Its location on a direct axis to the Capitol building, in addition to its grandiose style, makes it seem overpowering and out of scale. It this style of stadium were located in a suburb somewhere, it would fit in better.
How would you even go about styling an NFL stadium so that it doesn't seem out of scale in this location? They can't exactly make it smaller.
 
How would you even go about styling an NFL stadium so that it doesn't seem out of scale in this location? They can't exactly make it smaller.
A park area with a well designed classic style monument would be a good use for this site. Before RFK Stadium was built in 1961, it was park land.
 
"Should RFK stadium be replaced with a new NFL stadium" is a totally different conversation than "What should a new NFL stadium replacing RFK look like."

If a 70k+ person stadium is going there, I think this is a great aesthetic for it.
 
"Should RFK stadium be replaced with a new NFL stadium" is a totally different conversation than "What should a new NFL stadium replacing RFK look like."

If a 70k+ person stadium is going there, I think this is a great aesthetic for it.
Something like the render below would be great at this location, with a medium sized monument on top, nothing too garish. This type of through roadway tunnel would also replace and break up the maze of high speed roads encircling the site. I just think this is a bad spot for a stadium.

1772058186010.jpeg
 
This will not be nearly as imposing as the renders suggest. It is surrounded by some of the greenest streets in DC -- Capitol Hill -- and the Anacostia River which is undergoing a decades-long restoration. Considering the location is already serviced by Metro, it seems like a great reuse of the land. The redevelopment opportunity on the surrounding parcels is also a chance to free up some space for future development in a city that seriously lacks land to grow.

I am very pleased the Virginia proposal fell through. That would have been absolutely abysmal on a number of levels.
 
How would you even go about styling an NFL stadium so that it doesn't seem out of scale in this location? They can't exactly make it smaller.
One example could be to design a "sunken bowl" like SoFi Stadium in LA. That was necessitated due to the LAX flight path.
 
More new renders

1772814385176.jpeg

1772814399021.jpeg

1772814434390.jpeg

1772814450947.jpeg



At the very least they need to go back to this smaller version with the front facing side that didnt have the completely obnoxious and gaudy grand staircase.

1772814647689.jpeg

 
Robert stern as usual

New Rendering Reveals Isaac & Stern Architects’ 813-815 Broadway In Greenwich Village, Manhattan​

813_815_Broadway_Front_10162023_70d41ee919-777x964.jpg


“YIMBY spotted a new rendering for 813-815 Broadway, an upcoming 11-story mixed-use residential building on the eastern border of Greenwich Village, Manhattan. Designed by Issac & Stern Architects and developed by Magnum Real Estate Group, the future project will yield a total of 20 condominium units in one- to three-bedroom layouts, as well as 2,389 square feet of ground-floor retail space.”


As these new residential spaces take form, it’s always interesting to think about how interior design trends evolve to complement architectural styles. For instance, if you're looking for a way to elevate the ambiance of your own home, wall murals like the stunning wall murals green oaks from Fancy Walls could be a perfect fit. Their oak designs bring a natural, timeless touch to any space, echoing the balance of modern living with natural elements—just like the integration of contemporary development in historic neighborhoods like Greenwich Village.

https://newyorkyimby.com/2024/08/ne...-broadway-in-greenwich-village-manhattan.html
The design by Isaac & Stern Architects looks promising, and it's great to see a mix of residential and retail space being incorporated. The building's location on Broadway should provide easy access to everything the Village has to offer while adding a modern touch to the neighborhood.

It’ll be interesting to see how the new project integrates with the existing character of the area. With the variety of unit sizes and the retail space, it seems like it could bring a nice blend of urban convenience and community feel to the area. Looking forward to seeing how it progresses!
 
I find it incredibly mismatched for the location—not taking any consideration for its neighbors. These three buildings do not speak to each other, however the new facade really elevates this.
 
I find it incredibly mismatched for the location—not taking any consideration for its neighbors. These three buildings do not speak to each other, however the new facade really elevates this.
This stretch of Broadway is quite a mish-mash of styles already, so adding one more to the mix won't be unusual.
 
60 North 1st street, Williamsburg Brooklyn
1775312305717.jpeg

1775312320277.jpeg




27 East 4th street, NOHO Manhattan
1775312496094.jpeg

1775312512462.jpeg

1775312540927.jpeg




68 West 119th street, Harlem
1775312824488.jpeg

1775312840998.jpeg

1775312859028.jpeg




163 West 122nd Street, Harlem
1775312953464.jpeg

1775312972671.jpeg




1448 Third Avenue, upper east side
1775313187296.png

1775313207415.jpeg




375 Lafayette Street, NOHO
1775313324199.png

1775313351808.png

1775313418877.png

https://newyorkyimby.com/2026/02/up...r-375-lafayette-street-in-noho-manhattan.html
 
163 W 122 Street, Harlem is fantastic contextualism while being fresh and interesting. In general, this era of NYC infill architecture is enviable not just to Boston but virtually any city. In the case of Boston, there just aren't that many infill opportunities in brownstone neighborhoods as they are already largely intact.
 
In the case of Boston, there just aren't that many infill opportunities in brownstone neighborhoods as they are already largely intact.
Thats why I think we need to expand. You dont need to only do a couple infill buildings, we should make whole new neighborhoods. One example is how Mass ave row-houses end right at bmc and mass/cass and then mass ave is an empty wasteland all the way until edward everett square in dorchester.

Obviously right now mass/cass is still bad, but at the other end in dorchester theres been a lot of development. So itd be nice if mass ave slowly filled in from that direction over time until eventually it finally connects to the south end around bmc. It would take at least a decade and by then mass/cass should be cleaned up. As it is now it feels like the city ends at bmc, dorchester feels like its across a bay. Connecting the south end to dorchester should be a priority imo and continuing the row-houses of mass ave would be the nicest way to do it.
 

Back
Top