Tallest Buildings Out of the Ground and Growing

DZH22

Superstar
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
12,371
Reaction score
32,919
I don't know exactly where to put this, but I have been doing an exercise in my head for the past 15-20 years where I basically do a run through of all the tallest buildings currently out of the ground and growing in the inner metro (think Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, but also Everett for the casino, etc). Typically my main cutoff is 200', but will also mentally include anything ~150'+. This is actually my version of "counting sheep" and has helped me fall asleep for the past decade and a half.

At its absolute peak there were 8 buildings over 200' simultaneously growing at the same time. At that 200' cutoff, the Seaport often led the way, but we've also had some steady growth in Kendall, Fenway, North Point, and Assembly, along with the larger towers downtown.

However, today, right now, for the FIRST TIME since I've been doing this exercise, we have exactly 0 buildings over 200' out of the ground and growing. I guess you could say that the MXD Residential Vega could still gain an additional foot or two with the cladding on the mechanical crown, but for all intents and purposes we're at 0. I know that Volpe will give us a 336' soon, and there's the Northeastern dorm, but it takes a long time to dig and then fill in the foundation. That was never part of the count, as it's specifically based on visual growth (ie the city will look bigger next week as specific buildings continue to grow).

So this leaves me with a couple points:
-First, what actually is the tallest building under construction that's out of the ground and growing? Is it that 10-11 story residential on the Greenway? Is that it?!?!

-Second, can we blame this on Wu (and even Janey to a small extent) yet, or are we going to point to extenuating circumstances and give her a pass? It's worth noting that some of us, myself included, declared this would happen when she was elected, so it seems like we're more vindicated than anything. Unfortunately vindication isn't what I want. I want more towers! (residential/hotel only at this point please)

-Third... I don't know, any other thoughts?

If anybody (Stick maybe?) can help provide an accurate current list, I really need some help falling asleep!
 
I think you could argue the new Biogen HQ is out of the ground but I can't think of any others. If Fenway Center gets rebooted as apartments/condos or something else it would be rising quickly but that's a big IF right now.
 
I don't blame the tall building slowdown on Wu. The US as a whole is in an economic slowdown and will be for awhile, IMO.
Gathered online, here are some key economic indicators and trends (early 2026):
  • GDP Growth: The 1.4% Q4 2025 growth was much slower than the 3% projected by economists.
  • Inflation: The PCE price index rose 2.9% in December 2025, exceeding expectations
  • Labor Market: Job growth slowed in early 2026, with this PBS News article noting 92,000 jobs were lost in February 2026.
  • Consumer Behavior: Consumers are spending less, with high debt levels and inflation creating an "affordability crisis".
  • Future Outlook: While some expect a rebound due to tax cuts and AI investment, others foresee further cooling, with 2026 growth estimated to be modest.
 
I don't blame the tall building slowdown on Wu. The US as a whole is in an economic slowdown and will be for awhile, IMO.
Gathered online, here are some key economic indicators and trends (early 2026):
  • GDP Growth: The 1.4% Q4 2025 growth was much slower than the 3% projected by economists.
  • Inflation: The PCE price index rose 2.9% in December 2025, exceeding expectations
  • Labor Market: Job growth slowed in early 2026, with this PBS News article noting 92,000 jobs were lost in February 2026.
  • Consumer Behavior: Consumers are spending less, with high debt levels and inflation creating an "affordability crisis".
  • Future Outlook: While some expect a rebound due to tax cuts and AI investment, others foresee further cooling, with 2026 growth estimated to be modest.
Agree the macro-economic situation is really bad and the future is very murky as well. I don't think this has anything to do with Wu. The cost to borrow and the cost of construction and materials is really bad right now.
 
A pair of 18-story residential towers under construction at 75 Morrissey Blvd in Dorchester, 204' and 206'
Are these officially under construction? I've been maintaining the skyscraper page database for the Greater Boston Area and wasn't aware. It's wild to me that only 13 highrise buildings (115'+) are under construction in Boston at this time.

 
My understanding was that they finished demo in late 2025 and started construction in 2026
 
All the Chicken Littles in this forum are truly hilarious. P&G announced a new $1B Gillette HQ yesterday, Cambridge's tallest tower recently topped out, Biogen is building a new HQ, Hasbro and Lego recently relocated to the city, even today there was an article about a UK firm moving to Boston. And yet we're all on a 767 crashing into the ocean piloted by a maniacal Mayor Wu hellbent on destroying the city!!! Lol ok.

It's a shitty construction cycle. Get over it. We'll be fine.
 
All the Chicken Littles in this forum are truly hilarious. P&G announced a new $1B Gillette HQ yesterday, Cambridge's tallest tower recently topped out, Biogen is building a new HQ, Hasbro and Lego recently relocated to the city, even today there was an article about a UK firm moving to Boston. And yet we're all on a 767 crashing into the ocean piloted by a maniacal Mayor Wu hellbent on destroying the city!!! Lol ok.

It's a shitty construction cycle. Get over it. We'll be fine.
Yes to all of that. But...it is a particularly bad one this time.
 
only vaguely (very vaguely) related, but every time I walk or drive by 1 Dalton, I can't believe the developers didn't grab that opportunity when they could have. Just add another 40 feet and you're the new tallest!

I'm not even a height fetishest and that would've been exciting to me.
 
It doesn’t matter what Michelle Wu does or doesn’t do. She’s a passenger in a 767 that’s descending quickly into the ocean.
It always amazes me how many people think a mayor can impact national macro trends. And I'm assuming your post meant the mayor is on a flight she doesn't pilot, not that we are all going to die.
 
It always amazes me how many people think a mayor can impact national macro trends. And I'm assuming your post meant the mayor is on a flight she doesn't pilot, not that we are all going to die.
Sorry if I wasn’t clear. Yes, Wu is a passenger, she isn’t flying the plane.

The cost of steel is up 20% from a year ago, financing for everything except but data centers is dead, the State Department is doing everything possible to eliminate foreign enrollment in American Universities, foreign investment is down in general, biotech funding is gone, and buying equipment from overseas has become a huge concern. Hey I wonder why there are no supertalls on the horizon.
 
To those of you giving Wu a 100% pass... What is the tallest building proposal that was approved in Boston since she's been mayor? It's been 4 years and 4 months and it seems like the tower pipeline died with Janey and never resurrected under Wu. There's been a high demand for residential during that time. What is happening economically in the here and now shouldn't have a bearing on that severely lacking pipeline.

To me her policies stifled growth when there was growth to be had, and now combine with the national climate to make most projects unfeasible. (For example we are the nation's first city to require all new buildings to be net zero.) It's why the majority of this site nowadays is endless threads of 5-over-1's, as only the cheapest stuff still pencils out. That's how I see it anyway. Infinitely long approvals, net zero, affordable housing requirements, "too tall" and "too dense" and developers have shifted their interest elsewhere. Things still are being built in this country, and some cities (like our "peer" and west coast competitor SF) are proposing new major towers. It's a cop-out to say that Wu had nothing to do with our current situation when we're pretty much getting hit the hardest.
 
What I find interesting is that during every other correction, saturation in the local commercial and high end residential markets dragged all other construction down with it. That doesn't seem to be happening. I think it is the demand for middle class housing, and unfortunately the region cannot figure out how to get a middle class residential skyscrapers to pencil in
 
Aren't there a bunch of projects that were permitted during the Walsh and early in the Wu administration that could start tomorrow if the numbers penciled out? i.e. 88 Seaport Blvd, Parcels N, L3, L6 of Seaport Square, the remaining Gov Center Garage parcels (notably the second residential building). Feels like this is less a municipal policy discussion and more a national/local economy/construction cost discussion.

Also notes....there is currently a 14-foor apartment building under construction at Suffolk Downs. Not sure what the official height reading is on that.
 
To those of you giving Wu a 100% pass... What is the tallest building proposal that was approved in Boston since she's been mayor? It's been 4 years and 4 months and it seems like the tower pipeline died with Janey and never resurrected under Wu. There's been a high demand for residential during that time. What is happening economically in the here and now shouldn't have a bearing on that severely lacking pipeline.

To me her policies stifled growth when there was growth to be had, and now combine with the national climate to make most projects unfeasible. (For example we are the nation's first city to require all new buildings to be net zero.) It's why the majority of this site nowadays is endless threads of 5-over-1's, as only the cheapest stuff still pencils out. That's how I see it anyway. Infinitely long approvals, net zero, affordable housing requirements, "too tall" and "too dense" and developers have shifted their interest elsewhere. Things still are being built in this country, and some cities (like our "peer" and west coast competitor SF) are proposing new major towers. It's a cop-out to say that Wu had nothing to do with our current situation when we're pretty much getting hit the hardest.
Nailed it, this is a City of Boston problem, 20% affordable does not work. The State stretch energy code adds 20% cost to construction, together these two make approved developments not pencil. Add in high materials cost and union labor. There's a reason developers are moving to Everett (Greystar) and further, to the Carolina's (Fallon).
 
unfortunately the region cannot figure out how to get a middle class residential skyscrapers to pencil in

Ive wondered this too. Why were we able to build this



This


This


This


These


This


Those


This


That


This


And this


in the 50’s to 80’s no problem, but nowadays we just can not do it. We were able to even build public housing high rises decades ago, cabrini green the most infamous public housing projects were huge residential towers, but these days once its a high rise it automatically only pencils out if its entirely for millionaires. Its pretty crazy.

China, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and lots of other asian countries still build concrete apartment towers exactly like these today just in grey instead of red in enormous quantities to fit the working class into. Its what the majority of the housing stock and high rise stock is.. cheap concrete towers and lots of them. Even in the same hemisphere as us you have Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, Chile… in the middle east you have Egypt. For some reason we just cant make the math work for the middle class here when sooo many other places can.
 
Last edited:
Ive wondered this too. Why were we able to build this
At least some (and possibly all) of these were built by public subsidy, either as direct housing authority projects, or some combination of government grant and low interest bond assistance for CDCs. We need to go back to doing that, but as pointed out in the general housing thread, there is actually a cap on public housing, so that's a structural impediment now that didn't exist when these structures went up.
 

Back
Top