Other People's Rail: Amtrak, commuter rail, rapid transit news & views outside New England

gothamist.com

MTA to move forward with Second Ave subway work, despite Trump's push to kill the project

The MTA plans to get approval for a $1.1 billion contract from the agency's board next week. But officials said if a judge rules against the agency in a lawsuit, they'll have to nix the deal.
gothamist.com gothamist.com
The MTA plans to move forward with a $1.1 billion contract to start digging and building a new train station at East 106th Street for the Second Avenue subway — despite a pending lawsuit the transit agency filed against the Trump administration over an order to halt funding for the megaproject.
MTA officials said Friday they plan to bring the contract to the agency’s board for approval next week. It comes days after the authority claimed in its lawsuit that work on the subway extension “will eventually have to come to a screeching halt” if the federal government continues to withhold funding.
Officials say they want to ensure no time is lost on the long-sought subway line while they wait for the lawsuit to play out in court. The agency plans to wait until a judge rules before finalizing the contract, but doesn’t want to have to go back to the MTA board for approval after the order comes down.
[...]
The contract is the third of four contracts for the project. The MTA has already inked deals to relocate utilities and dig out the tunnel for the extension. The authority has one last contract for the project, which it hopes to put out for bid next year, and is still completing the designs for that work.
The MTA plans for trains to begin running on the new line by 2032.
Click to expand...
 
la.streetsblog.org

Metro Board Unanimously Advances K Line North Light Rail Extension - Streetsblog Los Angeles

Mayor Bass backed off of her push for indefinite delays requested by some mid-city residents opposed to tunneling under their homes
la.streetsblog.org la.streetsblog.org
This afternoon, the Metro board unanimously approved most of the route to extend K Line light rail northward. The approval came as the result of a compromise in which L.A. Mayor Karen Bass backed off of her push for indefinite delays requested by some mid-city residents opposed to tunneling under their homes. Today’s winners were K Line champions: Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, the city of West Hollywood, and transit advocates.
Overall the K Line Northern Extension (KNE) will be a key north-south light rail subway that will greatly increases Southern California rail network usefulness by tying together the Metro B, D, and E Lines. The extension will serve relatively population dense central neighborhoods, with plentiful job, retail, and entertainment destinations.
The board selected the San Vicente-Fairfax alignment as the “Locally Preferred Alternative” (LPA). Metro is currently considering three alignments in the project’s environmental studies (Environmental Impact Report – EIR). The alignment selected is the one championed by West Hollywood.
The preferred alignment is roughly ten miles long with nine stations. It extends from the current K Line terminus at Exposition/Crenshaw, connecting to the D Line at Wilshire/Fairfax, and to the B Line at Hollywood/Highland. The project includes six stations in the city of Los Angeles – in Mid-City, Fairfax and Hollywood – and three stations in the city of West Hollywood. (Extending the line to a tenth station – at the Hollywood Bowl – was also approved, but may not be included in early project phases.) The first phase (the initial operating segment – IOS) of the K Line North extension is expected to extend about four miles from the E Line to the D Line.
The extension has just over $2 billion dollars worth of Metro Measure M sales tax funding, but those construction funds are not scheduled until 2041. West Hollywood is pushing to accelerate the project, including paying for a quarter of the capital costs. West Hollywood plans to contribute $2.5 billion to the project via an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). Many cities (including the city of Los Angeles portion of the D Line) have balked at Metro’s 3 percent local match requirement.
Click to expand...
 
www.amny.com

Second Avenue Subway: MTA tells court it can’t move forward with project unless East Harlem landlord lets them into building | amNewYork

A landlord is fighting to keep the MTA from accessing his apartment building as part of a project to complete the transit agency’s Second Avenue Subway
www.amny.com www.amny.com
A landlord is fighting to keep the MTA from accessing his apartment building as part of a project to complete the transit agency’s Second Avenue Subway extension for fear that an inspection would expose deficiencies that will be costly to repair.
The MTA took the landlord to court this week, arguing that if a judge doesn’t grant it emergency access to the building to assess its structural integrity and carry out reinforcement work, it can’t move forward with the nearly $7 billion public works project that’s nearly a century in the making.
The latest phase of the planned extension for the Second Avenue subway line will bring it into East Harlem and over to Lexington Avenue — adding three new stations at 106th, 116th and 125th Streets. Once complete, some 110,000 daily riders in East Harlem, who currently have few transit options, will have better access to the Q train.
But the MTA says that the structural shells for the planned new station at 106th Street Station and tunnels to its north and south can’t be built until it can repair foundational walls and reinforce the foundation of the building at 2049 Second Ave., which is owned by East Harlem landlord Edgardo Kramer.
[...]
Kramer initially agreed to allow the MTA to enter his building and carry out the necessary work in 2023, according to a signed contract between him and the MTA.
However, a few months ago, Kramer backtracked on the agreement; emails between the parties show the landlord told the agency that, while he doesn’t oppose the MTA carrying out its work, he wouldn’t agree to let it onto his property unless it committed to pay for any and all repairs its structural integrity assessments revealed were necessary. The MTA said in court papers that it considers Kramer’s terms unreasonable.
Click to expand...
 

Oklahoma could cut financial ties with Heartland Flyer​

While talking budget on the House floor Thursday, lawmakers said that they can’t subsidize the Heartland Flyer anymore. Texas had not put aside funding for the passenger rail, so Oklahoma more than likely won’t be footing part of the bill.
“The state of Texas is saying they don’t want to fund it, so I don’t think it should be on the state of Oklahoma to subsidize it and keep it alive,” said Rep. Trey Caldwell (R-Appropriations Chair).
Lawmakers have discussed cutting ties with funding for the Heartland Flyer before. It has been a back-and-forth conversation over the years.
“I do not think it should be on the Oklahoma taxpayers to continue to subsidize the shopping and the lifestyle of people in North Texas,” said Caldwell.
[...]
Numbers from the last couple of years show that ridership has continued to increase. Last year, the North Central Texas Council provided $3.5 million in emergency funding to keep the train on route.
Without last year’s funding, the service would have shut down at the end of September.
Click to expand...
 
Amtrak has officially issued an RFP for its long-distance fleet replacement, which will replace all Amfleet II and Superliner cars with a unified single-level fleet. The supplier will be selected by the end of 2027, with Siemens the likely frontrunner given their recent dominance of the North American intercity rolling stock market with the Venture platform.
It’s official! We’ve started the procurement process for Amtrak’s largest-ever Long Distance train order.

Our customers deserve the best, and this new fleet will move us full speed ahead into a new era of American train travel.

We’ve issued a formal request for suppliers to bid on the new Long Distance fleet replacement contract.

Interested carbuilders are now preparing their proposals for submission. Following an extensive evaluation, we plan to announce our selected supplier by the end of 2027.

This once-in-a-generation fleet replacement program was developed in close coordination with the Federal Railroad Administration, with the goal of modernizing overnight and cross-country travel for a fleet that includes many cars today approaching nearly 50 years of operations.

The program calls for more than 800 new railcars across 14 routes.

Long Distance routes are a critical part of America’s national transportation system, linking major cities, smaller towns, and rural communities while supporting economic growth across regions.

Amtrak’s new and improved Long Distance fleet replacement strategy prioritizes fleet standardization, broadens competition among potential carbuilders, reduces program risk, and accelerates the replacement of aging passenger cars that today approach nearly half-a-century of service. Under this plan, all long-distance routes will transition to a universal single-level fleet, replacing today’s mix of bi-level and single-level equipment.

Procurement of new long-distance passenger cars represents one piece of Amtrak’s broader systemwide fleet modernization program. Amtrak continues to receive new high-powered ALC-42 locomotives for long-distance service, with 79 of 125 units delivered to date. New NextGen Acela trains launched last fall on America’s only high-speed rail corridor, and the new Airo fleet will begin service on Amtrak Cascades in 2026, followed by the Northeast Regional and other short- and mid-distance routes in the coming years.
Click to expand...

Amtrak also released a promotional video showing interior design concepts for coach, sleeper, diner, and lounge cars, though the actual final product could differ significantly.
 
Budd Enjoyer said:
Would be so nice if this was “replaced” with a longer route that goes further south following the route of the Texas Eagle. Not ideal for full passenger service yet, but there absolutely is demand for Austin-San Antonio
Click to expand...
I agree that extending the Heartland Flyer to San Antonio is a good idea, in addition to a northward extension to Newton, KS, or Kansas City. But all of this depends on state funding, which Texas (and now Oklahoma) won't even provide for the existing route. I wouldn't be surprised if funding dries up completely and the Heartland Flyer ceases to exist in the near future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top