BronsonShore
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2014
- Messages
- 544
- Reaction score
- 1,752
Although the CSX developers haven't taken advantage of this, I'd argue that the strict FAA limit in the Seaport as a contrast is a large part of why the latter is so much more urban than the former. I am by no means anti-tower, but I find that the best urbanism is consistently in places that do not have them, or at least where the towers serve as background, without interfering at the street level.
Right. Height has nothing to do with urbanity. And to the extent that many towers have terrible street presences by necessity, they can often be anti-urban. See, e.g, the tallest building in the Western hemisphere, which is about as anti-urban as any single building can possibly be. But here I am contributing to yet another "why can't Boston be taller!" digression...
Last edited: