Search results

agree with the above except the tunnel is not going away, just getting narrower. at least it wasnt last time around, but then again there was going to be a tunnel at Sullivan and now there isnt going to be so not sure about here at Austin St.

thanks for posting. this is IMP though, so probably better here: https://archboston.com/community/threads/wentworth-institute-of-technology-institutional-masterplan.7009/

thats not accurate at all, as shown by the flood maps. only a small portion of the BH site is even in the 2070 1% flood zone. not sure if its intentional for a narrative or ignorance but here it is, 2070. most of Charlestown is actually pretty well protected except the neck and the infill...

Sullivan area is much more suseptable to flooding than here. Look at the food maps. Not only that but it provides a way in for water to go far to the west.

Article 80 Large project review supersedes zoning for parking.

for the southern end of Fort Point, this is the more current layout of roads and open space (also includes 15 Necco and Channelside 3 buildings) https://www.sasaki.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Plan_with-text-labels_website-1800x1391.jpg

design flaw of what, the dam from 45 years ago?

Correct, and that all went down under prior administrations, city and state.

but the 'zoning' process for this would be Article 80 Large Project Review (as with anything over 50KSF). there arent parking minimums on any of the land uses. zoning doesnt have a say in parking for these projects. there are maximums in place, not minimums, and there has been for over 20...

https://www.mbta.com/projects/silver-line-extension-slx-alternatives-analysis

what is the address/location of the EEI tower site that also sold? there will be a thread for 83 leo before end of spring...

The bike lane is not outboard of the sidewalk. How are you getting that (especially from a picture that is structure only)? It's already half built on the Charlestown side between the road and sidewalk. there wasn't enough room on the N End side to finish it with temp bridge in place...

the picture is of the east side, poster wasnt referring to the temporary bridge.

It would be in the recordings from the recent BPDA meetings. Otherwise look here https://www.boston.gov/education/white-stadium#faq Then click on transportation

its #1. the article is 5 months old, there have been multiple meetings since then where they have committed to it for game days. didnt mean to make you feel called out, was just trying to keep information current. you are definitely correct that they were noncommittal during the fall meetings...

this x1000. I golf there on weekends and there is always music blasting from different areas of the park that carry sound through the park. its a unique golf experience thats for sure and adds to the experience in my opinion. this is not correct. the City has committed to having the team...

The T12 of BNRD is serving this. Direct connection from Andrew to Seaport along a D St bus corridor without the circuitous route.

only most of the residents that speak at these meetings do not like the BRT lanes.

I wasn't commenting on what was next, I was discussing why the east parcel plan was originally 3 buildings but is now only 1. The residential building is on the west parcel.

thats why there is only 1 building in the plan now. 'near' the tunnels, not on them or supports through the stations as the previous 3 building iteration would have required.