Search results

And then goes through dense population almost the whole way in. The space between Lynn and Eastie is as much swamp as anything, so, no.

Center running would be fine if done like the OL, with decked over areas near the station

6 min frequency would be more than enough. Quincy/Braintree is no less populated/dense as Lynn/Salem

An empty k car weighs at least 120k. 180 people, a full car, would add 36k

They need to move quickly to reserve provisions for a row in the Volpe redevelopment

There is definitely spare capacity on BL past Maverick. While the 4xx routes do move a fair amount of people, a maxed frequency BL say 3 min, could easily split either after Maverick or Airport for a Chelsea stab.

How many times do we have to rediscuss this? If GJ is to provide useful transit, the only mode is LRVs, from West Station to Sullivan Sq. Time separated for FRA moves AT NIGHT, if you must, but trollies, people!

Otherwise than your statement, not mine. Sorry, awkwardly worded.

While the Springfield to Worcester section might have less demand at first, Worcester -Boston I would expect to be significant. I think that the NNEIRI study suggests otherwise. Are you familiar with it?

You assume asymmetrical demand, or do you have data?

So, a single track TBM (circular) tunnel would need to be....18ft? 16ft? 17ft? The car is ....12ft 9in tall?

Except the new development of Yard 5 did not leave provision for re use of the Dedham ROW

Why wouldn't you have two of them be a one seat ride?

Does anyone know the minimum diameter a BL train might operate in?

Physically, yes. CSX is the problem

How about the Ag Branch? I know that pass rail was studied at one point in time

How about Fitchburg west of Gardner?

Is that MOU a public document and is it available electronically?

Thanks! So, how about NH border to Manchester? Does CSX now "owe" the T a certain level of maintenance if they ever decide to operate there?

Can anyone explain the exact rights and responsibilities does Amtrak have on the B&A mainline?