There's some of thes
There's some of these in Cambridgeport + Area IV in Cambridge, too. Seems like it's one of the oldest existing mass housing types around?
There's also a lot of them in Brooklyn, though usually hidden through vinyl siding.
The census projections were terrible when compared to the actuals in 2020 for most old, large cities esp in the Northeast. I wouldn't trust them as they've been claiming declines since 2018 and we know the first couple years of that at least didn't happen
There's parks all along the waterfront! Putting in more large grassy fields does not equal parkland and at some point we need actual utilization of space. Let's not fetishize parks, but instead build great ones.
I guess I find this entire conversation bizarre: the BPDA and developers have gone...
Yes, Boston, where the sun is in the Northern sky so often.
And seriously, if one great wide lane of park is not enough and you need diagonals too, why let anything get built, they'll always crimp out your view.
This is fair, but one might wonder if that space could instead be used for staging or other purposes instead of "parks" while the whole complex is built out.
Not only does Cambridge require a surplus of too small, underprovisioned "parks" next to busy roads, they want them built first. Who do they actually think is going ot use "Community Park" and "Sixth st Park South" next to massive construction sites?
Who owns the two lots between DBC and Mt Vernon St? It'll look real weird adjoining parking lots and small buildings that need redev (ha!). I do hate how they shrunk it a bit and are adding a "pavilion"
Druker owns it, so it'll be built on one day.
The biggest lots are still on Washington and there's some old taxpayers down the blocks towards Union Park. Those'll go before Air Rights.