Search results

A Decent Place to Live by Jane Roessner is a good history of Columbia/Harbor Point if anyone's interested. It mostly covers the history of the housing development, but there's a bit of history about what was there prior as well. The discussion of Columbia into Harbor as a sort of ongoing...

Re: 111 Federal St. | Formerly Trans National Place (Winthrop Square) Part 2 Let's pump the breaks on the out of context oil/war talk please. I'm sensing a three page off topic digression.

Tito's running for mayor. He needs to rack up his list of things he opposes Marty on, regardless of how stupid they are.

Glad to hear there's still a lot of room for optimism.

That sort of puts a damper in the hope that Springfield becomes their manufacturing or at least assembly hub.

The garage makes the Aquarium viable? It's an amenity at best.

Re: 111 Federal St. | Formerly Trans National Place (Winthrop Square) Part 2 She's like the shitty Lorax.

Re: Site in Hub top choice for a soccer stadium Soccer stadiums tend to be more Garden sized (~18,000) than Fenway (~34,000) or Gillette (~70,000).

Re: Offical City Hall Plaza Proposals The only thing I don't particularly like about a ferris wheel here is, what are you gonna see? A bit into the front half of Beacon Hill? The tippy top of Old North? And then Center Plaza, City Hall, and bunch of other crap.

Re: Site in Hub top choice for a soccer stadium Groundhog Day.

^Post of the Year material right there.

And it's been the Causeway bbq spot for a few years now.

This opinion = insane

Demographically, the North Shore actually has more population centers than the South. Outside of Quincy and Braintree, the population gets pretty thin pretty quickly as you move down towards Plymouth. On the other hand, the North Shore has population density from Revere, through Lynn and Saugus...

What would you call Strada? It ain't exactly a dump. Or the million dollar condos in the North End and West End that you can spit on in a strong wind from this spot?

I want this project everywhere.

And so the conclusion is that we have to break up the union. Again, that's a major assumption. Sorry you don't find that civil.

I didn't realize calling a logical fallacy a logical fallacy was an ad hominem.

I'm sorry but still, even if you're conclusion is that the union is wasting money, the idea that we aren't getting more tax funding so the only solution to fix the T is disbanding the union is ridiculous. There are really no other options that you can think of? How about fixing the flawed...

Is this just a competition to see who can throw the most logical fallacies against the wall?