Search results

The red outline there is actually bigger than the shipwright site and includes 830 lynnway. That is a separate development bigger than shipwright (twice as big I think).

if you really care, check out the recordings of the BPDA meetings from a few months ago. the architects explained the facade (I dont remember exactly, but something to do with music I believe)

just need to run the amount of buses that were planned for 30 years ago. it would then have more capacity between SS and SLW than the main trunk of the green line. also better bus connections to the south on the red line at broadway or andrew would also make it so not everybody had to be on...

thanks for the clarification. I thought they were 1 project since they were under construction back to back. I wouldnt say they are unrelated though, the MCCA seems like they responded to the roadway improvements by creating a nicer edge on their parcel to match. There is no way design wasnt...

this is Cypher St. Its a MassDOT/Massport redesign (and extension from D St to E St). Its meant to create a more direct truck route connection between Conley Terminal and the Bypass Rd instead of using the Haul Rd, which takes you into Marine Industrial Park. this presentation provides a good...

the bus lane was put in when the bridge was already under construction and there was only 1 NB lane going over the bridge. theory was that you didnt need 2 lanes feeding it. The bridge is now 'complete' and there are 2 lanes again. the 1 NB lane at the bridge is what caused the traffic issue...

interesting, thats a pretty big space for one retail use.

agreed on the tax breaks. but this footbridge isnt being built for the stadium. its already needed and its already funded. there is much more non stadium development coming to the area, whether it be Encore East or the 5MSF from the gas tanks site.

Isn't it governments job to provide infrastructure to allow economic development? You realize 'mitigation' was just started decades ago as a NIMBY tactic right? We know what's planned and coming. Build the infrastructure to allow it to happen.

SB construction/opening and garage facade of some sort on that exposed end coming soon

it might not be helping, but this has been an issue since before January. its not just union costs but many factors including 20% affordable.

I'm guessing the 2 existing hotels on this site are doing more than ok if somebody is looking to add the 3rd.

They are showing past performers that played at the original location to show the importance of bringing it back. Same with passion pit and Phoebe bridgers.

https://www.scape.com/en-global/about-scape

another option to the Single Point Urban Interchange (shown above) is to do a diverting diamond interchange. its basically an SPUI but with the Columbia Rd approaches flipped so that all of the left turns (EB to NB on ramp, SB off ramp to EB, NB off ramp to WB, and WB to SB on ramp) dont have...

75 Morrissey (TV studio building) are Bldgs A and B. This is a change of 1 lab building into residential. the existing office building is 55 (C and D) the Star Market is 45 (E, F, G and Park)

I think the confusion comes from your use of 'its' and it only being at the arch. which could be taken to me the 'architectural screening' or fascia, which has been the general topic of this discussion.

they were against the zero parking. they are typically pro development in this area. the realignment is from the PLAN Dot Ave study. this development is not implementing it.

the architectural work that doesnt impact operations being done last? would seem to make sense

more activation: https://www.bostonswickedhauntfest.com/ winter market is planned for next