Search results

thats not accurate. granted it wasnt as good, but it wasnt 'removed'. and it wasnt just the building that diminished the connection as the site plans evolved, there are other factors too. the image above has 2 buildings constructed on top of the T stations, which just isnt feasible at this...

The intent of those electronic RTOR signs is to allow a right during a left turn overlap (so say allow NB and SB rights when EB and WB have protected lefts). There arent peds going during this phase in any direction. The sign is then illuminated when EB/WB (using example above) has the green...

not part, that is THE intention. get people to have a different/better option than red line/silver line to access Seaport. also, the intention of the T7 is to connect Sullivan (and points north) to the Seaport. extending that route even further to Andrew would be a negative for those riders.

Looks like through arrows were added overnight.

this would be way more accurate if the tower portion was rotated so that the thin side faced north. as seen in the elevations:

my guess is this: https://urbanglass.org/glass/detail/dramatically-curved-glass-building-generates-hazardous-light-reflection-pro

Read the discuss up thread. Nothing is be replicated.

Hatching on right (of this pic) because it will be behind construction fencing so median can be removed. Hatching on left because trucks (going to tunnels) can't make right turn without slip lane. Can't remove the slip lane and make a wider radius for trucks because the pedestrian crossing is...

what is being constructed now is an interim condition that keeps the median, but it and the SB lanes will be behind construction fencing. This work will open NB vehicles and sidewalks on both sides. final condition hasnt been exactly determined, but it removes the median and isnt expected to...

such a random thing to harp on about. the structure isnt even complete, but the lights arent on?? btw, can we get this thread merged already

when I went by this AM work was being done on the curbs.

the zoning is set by the 100 Acres Master Plan. Dont know/havent looked to see if they are exceeding open space (or if its set at 50% min required) or limiting FAR (or if its set at 4.3 max allowed).

most of the work is being done under the bridge right now, finishing up the structure by Converse Construction Look-Ahead: August 18 through August 31 Scheduled Work Pier 1 West columns formwork, V-arm, and rebar Architectural trellis installation City Square sidewalk City Square utilities...

To get the thread back on track here they aren't building anything in the picture. That is the pedestrian protection to the T still up. On schedule for reopening as discussed above.

the correct answer here: http://archboston.com/community/threads/bulfinch-crossing-congress-street-garage-west-end.2850/post-481901 along with sidewalks open as well.

agree with the above except the tunnel is not going away, just getting narrower. at least it wasnt last time around, but then again there was going to be a tunnel at Sullivan and now there isnt going to be so not sure about here at Austin St.

thanks for posting. this is IMP though, so probably better here: https://archboston.com/community/threads/wentworth-institute-of-technology-institutional-masterplan.7009/

thats not accurate at all, as shown by the flood maps. only a small portion of the BH site is even in the 2070 1% flood zone. not sure if its intentional for a narrative or ignorance but here it is, 2070. most of Charlestown is actually pretty well protected except the neck and the infill...

Sullivan area is much more suseptable to flooding than here. Look at the food maps. Not only that but it provides a way in for water to go far to the west.