Search results

Care to expand on 'nuts'? Is it fair to say that if 3-4 levels of housing here carries the day for you that it is the proposed height that is 'nuts'?

If you won't build this housing, you won't build any housing. That said...presented commitments around 100% Union labor, 20% inclusionary, the current spread on independent retailers (read: heavy TIAs) free retail spaces to the City...ETC also say this won't ACTUALLY be built any time soon...

From this perspective that setback (L6/L7?) seems very complementary to the context here.

Senator Jehlen has been doing that for years. The greater irony is that what was an illusion of standing conceded by the City to 'Neighborhood Councils' in development review procedures was subsequently codified procedurally to be some manifest 'community voice'; turns out its not everyone's...

? Wouldn't that have been fun! If your association with the name is pro-housing, I am happy to wear it. Keep calm and nimby on.

I appreciate the acknowledgement of the effort although I admit it falls short of the condescension of your google earth tutorial. Not so much on EIS, shadow study...sure - massing views that satisfy the desires of your heart, negative.

@Equilibria , I suspect you know this but "I don't oppose it, BUT xyz" reads: "I oppose it" - just say it. Its ok! "Tried to underinform....", really? Is your permitting expectation that anyone proposing something should daylight everything anyone could reasonably object to? I'd agree it would...

How unserious a comment. Please excuse us as we proceed to ignore land use controls, time value of money, economics, etc to subsidize a non-financially viable alternative out of benevolence.

If it makes you feel any better that is literally the last thing developers want to do. Like most people, they too have an aversion to throwing good money after bad. They participate in a market, they do not control the market. They DO however espouse ideas of 'time being of the essence' before...