Erlang | 45 Forest Ave | Portland

PWMFlyer

Active Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
447
Reaction score
756
Developer plans apartments in Portland building where college considered dorms
The Maine College of Art & Design dropped plans for a dorm on Forest Avenue after the city decided to move its social services and public health offices, including its health clinic, next door.

byline-mobile-nav.png

BY RANDY BILLINGSSTAFF WRITER

Share
facebook
tweet
reddit
linkedin
email
print
2 COMMENTS
At right is 39 Forest Ave., where the city decided to move its social services and public health offices, including its health clinic. To the left is 45 Forest Ave., which the Maine College of Art and Design was considering for student dorms.

At right is 39 Forest Ave., where the city decided to move its social services and public health offices, including its health clinic. To the left is 45 Forest Ave., which the Maine College of Art and Design was considering for student dorms. Shawn Patrick Ouellette/Staff Photographer



A local developer is proposing to restore and convert a historic downtown Portland office building into 81 apartments, after a plan to use the space for a Maine College of Art & Design dormitory fell through.
The former New England Telephone Building at 45 Forest Ave., which is designated as a historic landmark, was originally eyed by the college for a new 180-student dorm. But school officials reconsidered those plans after the city decided to move its social services and public health offices, including its health clinic, next door.

Jonathan Culley, managing partner of Redfern Properties, which was working with the college on the dorm proposal, said he is now proposing a mix of studio and one-bedroom apartments for the site.
“(MECA&D) decided this location was not suitable for what they were trying to do, but we remain very positive about this location in the city,” Culley said, adding he’s comfortable with the city’s offices and health clinic next door. “We decided this is entirely compatible with the type of housing we want to build. There remains a real shortage of housing in Portland so we’re looking for every opportunity we can to build new housing.”

RELATED
Maine College of Art plans dormitory for 180 students in downtown Portland

Advertisement

MECA&D released a strategic plan in late August that called for the creation of a living and learning center for students within walking distance of the college’s main building on Congress Street.
Last spring, the college announced that the Forest Avenue building fit its search criteria.
But college officials expressed concerns about student safety after the city announced its plan to consolidate the city’s social services and public health offices at 39 Forest Ave. College officials noted that students can access the college’s art studios 24 hours a day – whenever inspiration strikes – and pointed out that 70 percent of the student body of roughly 500 students are young women.
Those concerns were criticized by students, who believed the college was purveying harmful stereotypes and not doing enough for current student safety.
Neither Beth Elicker, the college’s executive vice president, nor Leah Igo Brooks, the director of marketing and communications, responded to interview requests Thursday.
The city originally hoped to have the renovation completed by July, but City Hall spokesperson Jessica Grondin said the building renovations are not yet finished because of scheduling issues with contractors and other factors. The new space will house social services, including General Assistance, and public health programming, including the needle exchange, STD/HIV testing and the Portland Community Free Clinic, which provides health care to low-income people.
Advertisement

“We are solidifying moving dates, but nothing has moved into the building yet and construction is still ongoing,” Grondin said. “We are looking at possibly hosting a Zoom community update/Q&A about the move in the next few weeks, as we said we would during the approval process.”
The proposed apartments, which will be a mix of market rate and affordable, are generally between 400 and 600 square feet. The projected rents for the market rate units are between $1,300 and $1,800 a month, Culley said.
The project, consisting of 51 studios and 30 one-bedroom units, also will meet new inclusionary zoning requirements that were approved by voters in November.
Culley said 25 percent of the units will be affordable to people making up to 80 percent of the area median income, which ranges from $56,504 for a single person to $64,576 for a two-person household. Those units would rent for $1,198 for a studio and $1,398 for a one bedroom, he said.

RELATED
Portland councilors back plan to move social services, but want time to address neighbors’ concerns

Advertisement

Culley said he is able to meet the more stringent affordability requirements, but only because he is planning to use state and federal historic tax credits to help finance the roughly $15 million renovation.
“We haven’t been able to make it work in a new development,” he said.
Culley said the units would have 13-foot ceilings and large windows, and the building will have amenities, like a gym and a lounge for residents.
“They’re certainly on the smaller side, but what we’re finding is that in urban, walkable locations, people are willing to sacrifice size for location, convenience and amenities,” he said.
 
Developer plans apartments in Portland building where college considered dorms
...
Culley said he is able to meet the more stringent affordability requirements, but only because he is planning to use state and federal historic tax credits to help finance the roughly $15 million renovation.
“We haven’t been able to make it work in a new development,” he said.
Culley said the units would have 13-foot ceilings and large windows, and the building will have amenities, like a gym and a lounge for residents.
“They’re certainly on the smaller side, but what we’re finding is that in urban, walkable locations, people are willing to sacrifice size for location, convenience and amenities,” he said.
You may want to clean that up a bit...
 
Anyone know the outcome of the PB meeting last week? I had to cut out during the 58 Fore St discussion and I don't see minutes posted. I assume it went through without any major issues?
 
The 45 Forest Ave project received unanimous approval from the Planning Board on November 23rd. Redfern is excited to create 81 new apartment units in this building, including 21 units affordable for those earning 80% of AMI. We still have a few challenges ahead, but hope to begin construction in March with completion in summer 2023.
 
This is a cross the street from my Company's portland office. will be interesting to see the development...some people have broken into the office to sleep overnight or camped out in the vestibule.. ....has been interesting
 
The 45 Forest Ave project received unanimous approval from the Planning Board on November 23rd. Redfern is excited to create 81 new apartment units in this building, including 21 units affordable for those earning 80% of AMI. We still have a few challenges ahead, but hope to begin construction in March with completion in summer 2023.
Makes me wonder how many other buildings in Portland can be repurposed like this.
 
Read the Jonathan Culley quote in this. Disturbing. This is the last large scale residential project they will be doing in Portland, or until after 5 years if the Green New Deal is revoked (not including pricey condo development).
The Maine Housing Crunch: The Green New Deal and Portland’s dilemma | Mainebiz.biz
So basically developers are blaming Portland's "Green New Deal" of 25% inclusionary zoning (and lack of obtaining Tax Incremented Financing) to killing affordable housing building projects.

What they're not saying is that affordable housing is too expensive to build without the return on more expensive housing.

AND that they lack financing and need a TIF.

So basically there's no "incentive" for them to build affordable housing, not that they CAN'T.
 
So basically developers are blaming Portland's "Green New Deal" of 25% inclusionary zoning (and lack of obtaining Tax Incremented Financing) to killing affordable housing building projects.

What they're not saying is that affordable housing is too expensive to build without the return on more expensive housing.

AND that they lack financing and need a TIF.

So basically there's no "incentive" for them to build affordable housing, not that they CAN'T.
So have to jump in here. He mean's can't. We actually literally CAN'T build Market Rate Apartments (Missing Middle) in Portland. They aren't viable and can't be financed. Westbrook - on the other hand - has I think close to 1000 units of rental housing proposed currently between 3 different developers. ~C
 
Is this room at the very top of the building? The ladders are to the roof?
It’s the 6th floor. The ladders had tracks on the ceiling to reach the top of the switch boards!
 
I'll bet this 6th floor renovated into a nightclub, a la Perch (downtown L.A.) leading up to its expansive rooftop area could have made this into the coolest place to have drinks in Portland. That would be a draw to rent some of these apartments.
 
Last edited:

Is there
So basically developers are blaming Portland's "Green New Deal" of 25% inclusionary zoning (and lack of obtaining Tax Incremented Financing) to killing affordable housing building projects.

What they're not saying is that affordable housing is too expensive to build without the return on more expensive housing.

AND that they lack financing and need a TIF.

So basically there's no "incentive" for them to build affordable housing, not that they CAN'T.

So have to jump in here. He mean's can't. We actually literally CAN'T build Market Rate Apartments (Missing Middle) in Portland. They aren't viable and can't be financed. Westbrook - on the other hand - has I think close to 1000 units of rental housing proposed currently between 3 different developers. ~C

Is the problem the 25% affordable units? Can you condoize and do a LIHTC deal within a deal like in some big cities?
 
I think the recycling value for some of that metal (all that copper wire!) will really help pay for the project! (Also, I wonder where the functionality all that provided is now being done.)
 

Back
Top