Affordable-housing in Maine

P

Patrick

Guest
this story is odd

Affordable-housing plan hits resistance
Neighbors of the 37-unit project say it will lower property values and impede economic progress.

portland-press-herald_2866188.jpg


By Tom Bell tbell@mainetoday.com
Staff Writer

PORTLAND ? A group of property owners is fighting a proposed affordable housing development in the city's arts district, arguing that it would lower property values and inhibit the area's economic resurgence.
click image to enlarge

Susan Fitzpatrick points to her condo building while standing in front of an Oak Street parking lot where affordable housing is planned. Fitzpatrick opposes the project because ?I don?t want my property?s value driven down.?

John Patriquin/Staff Photographer
Select images available for purchase in the
Maine Today Photo Store

Supporters say the project would provide housing for artists and people who work in low-wage service jobs downtown.

Avesta Housing plans to build a 37-unit, four-story apartment building on Oak Street, behind Five Fifty-Five, an upscale restaurant at 555 Congress St. The 9,600-square-foot lot is now used for monthly parking.

Greg Payne, Avesta's development officer, said the apartments would be 420 square feet and rent for $500 to $750 a month.

He said the agency would conduct an aggressive marketing campaign to attract artists, and the apartments would have amenities that artists might appreciate -- high ceilings, oversized stainless-steel sinks, extra storage space and a common area on the first floor that could be a showcase for art.

The exterior design is still being developed. Payne said Avesta Housing wants the building to be of high quality, creative and different. He acknowledged that fair housing laws would prevent the agency from renting exclusively to artists. ''If someone says, 'I want to be here but I have no artistic talent whatsoever,' we absolutely will let them have a shot,'' Payne said.

Some of the neighboring property owners, including residents of expensive condominiums, the owners of Five Fifty-Five and the owners of other commercial buildings on Congress Street, see the project as a lost opportunity. They say the arts district already has enough housing for low-income residents, and that it needs more people who have money to spend at restaurants and art galleries.

''When you add people who can't do anything to the economic development of the community, you take up space,'' said Penelope Carson, who owns a nearby commercial building on Congress Street in a partnership with her brother, Harold Pachios.

Tom Moulton, developer of Winslow Lofts, a 17-unit condominium building at 547 Congress St., said affordable housing should be built elsewhere. He said the large amount of subsidized housing in the area and the proximity of services for the homeless are making it difficult to revitalize Congress Street and turn it into a much-needed economic engine for the city.

Rather than look out for the greater good of the city, officials ''only look out for the underdogs,'' he said. ''Everybody is so concerned about political correctness, that sometimes gets in the way.''

Susan Fitzpatrick, who bought a one-bedroom condo in Winslow Lofts for $260,000 in 2006, said she is worried that Avesta Housing's project would increase crime.

''I worked my butt off to live downtown,'' she said. ''I don't want my property's value driven down, and I don't want the crime rate going up.''

Payne said that rents in Avesta's development would be high enough so that only employed people could afford to live there.

Avesta will present its plan to the city in about a month. It needs approval from the Planning Board and the Historic Preservation Board.

City Councilor Kevin Donoghue, whose district includes the neighborhood, said there is ''unwavering'' support on the City Council for projects like the one planned for Oak Street.

He said the city's comprehensive plan and housing plan call for increased housing of all types. From the city's perspective, he said, the only controversial issue is how many parking spaces the building should have.

The proposal is the ''perfect realization of the comprehensive plan,'' he said. ''We have no policy grounds for displacing or denying housing access to working people.''
 
this assumption has been debunked many times by real estate specialists, not just housing advocates.
 
"...and rent for $500 to $750 a month."

Gee, that's what I pay for my studio apartment - and it's roughly what thousands of other renters in our city pay. Apparently we're driving down property values, and the city would be so much better off if our buildings had never been built. These people think that a garbage-strewn parking lot is so much better for their property values?

Oh yeah, based on my rent, I also drive up the crime rate, according to Susan Fitzpatrick. How did she know that me and my gang of restaurant waitstaff were just about to go on a meth-fogged shooting rampage this very evening? Truly this lady must be an genius sociologist. Somebody call the Swedes and nominate her for a Nobel prize.</sarcasm>
 
^Enjoyable rant!

"Susan Fitzpatrick, who bought a one-bedroom condo in Winslow Lofts for $260,000 in 2006, said she is worried that Avesta Housing's project would increase crime."

I wonder how much her mortgage is? I doubt she is paying a lot more than the $750 a month limit that separates most of us poor people from the privileged such as herself. Does she realize that her condo is only about 1,000 feet from the city's homeless shelter anyway?

I could understand some resistance if there was a proposal to build a prison here but this is truly odd.

Also note that this would be affordable housing, while several quotes from the opposition refer to this as "low income housing." There is clearly a misconception when people picture what the proposal is.
 
As usual, I am sharing my editorial here first, in a very rough draft.

I want to thank the quoted subjects of an article printed in the February 26, 2010 edition of the Press Herald for their humorous remarks. The article to which I am referring is entitled ?Affordable-housing plan hits snag,? and it noted several fears of Downtown Portland property owners relating to a project planned for a vacant lot in the City?s Art?s District. Stated anxieties ranged from potentially detrimental effects on surrounding property values to worries about increased criminal behavior which, according to those concerned, are oddly presumed to inevitably stem from the ?affordability? of the proposed housing. One particularly entertaining quote nicely sums up the mind-blowingly ironical nature of this parade of hyperbolic horribles: ''When you add people who can't do anything to the economic development of the community, you take up space,? whined one of the area?s commercial property owners. Given the history of Congress Street?s recent renaissance, which witnessed eclecticism and artistic talent pull the thoroughfare from the clutches of economic ruin, I found this quote remarkably strange. Avesta?s development will target artists, the very group which collectively served as the creative catalyst for Congress Street?s resurgence. For the area?s elitist inhabitants to oppose the continued ability of this group to inhabit central downtown is to displace the very force which conferred trendy status and the market premium it can command on their properties in the first place. I was relieved to read of the City Council?s apparent support for this and similar projects, and its implicit rejection of the scare tactics employed by the comically uninformed transplants who provided the meat of the article to which this editorial responds.
 

Back
Top