Mass. Challenges Census Bureau

12345

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
589
Reaction score
449
State officials going full bore to boost 2010 Census tally


In recent years, the notion that the Massachusetts population was slipping bruised local egos and triggered bouts of civic and political hand-wringing: Was Boston no longer the hub of the universe? Had the region become too complacent to attract newcomers, too expensive to keep them? Could the state actually end up losing another member of Congress?

Mayor Thomas M. Menino and state politicians are hoping to prove the latter, as they launch a multipronged effort to boost the ranks responding to the 2010 Census - vital numbers that determine how many seats Massachusetts has in Congress and how much money the state collects from many federal programs.

"We're in serious jeopardy of losing one representative, if not two in the House," said Holly St. Clair, manager of the metro data center for the Metropolitan Area Planning Council. "It's not just about how slow we're growing. It's about how fast other parts of the nation are growing."

For years, Massachusetts population specialists and politicians have contended that the census was failing to count many state residents, especially those living in group quarters, such as the state's many college dormitories. As the 2010 Census approaches, concern is growing so pitched that the Legislature tapped researchers at the University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute to conduct their own population estimates, starting with an up-to-date headcount of students, prisoners, the homeless, and others living in group settings.

To produce a count, the researchers contacted every college and university in Massachusetts to count dormitory dwellers, and they itemized the number of people living in all prisons, military installations, convents, nursing homes, and shelters across Massachusetts. The result: A new tally of 234,556 people in group housing - 8 percent more than the census is expected to estimate for 2007. Two-thirds of those newly identified are in the city of Boston.

The city and state hope to use the preliminary data to persuade the Census Bureau to boost its full population estimates, due out this week.

The effort isn't cheap: After spending $700,000 over the past two years, the Legislature is expected to devote $800,000 in the upcoming budget to the census effort.

Secretary of State William F. Galvin said the expense is more than worth it, considering the potential millions of dollars that could be lost with inaccurate counts. So much federal money is allocated based on population that Massachusetts officials estimate each person reported in the 2000 Census was worth $1,621.52. Stagnant population counts cost Massachusetts a congressional seat after the 1980 Census and again after the 1990 count.

In 2000, Galvin added, "We maintained our congressional delegation for the first time in 30 years. I don't know if I can pull a rabbit out of the hat again." The city has also launched its own census effort through the Boston Redevelopment Authority, which handles demographic information for the city.


"It's too important to us to lose numbers and also federal funds, and we could lose a congressman," Menino said. "We're going to work on that with them from the beginning, not the end. We want to be proactive. We've had to react."

For two years running, Boston officials challenged dispiriting population counts that estimated people were leaving Boston year by year. Menino defended Boston as a city on the rise and asserted that the Census Bureau's methodology was flawed - undercounting immigrants, residents of public housing, and students who live in dormitories.

The Census Bureau, which typically adjusts population estimates when challenged, revised its numbers by about 30,000 people one year, 5,000 the next. But that still put Boston's 2006 estimate only at 595,698 people - barely a blip above the 2000 Census count of 589,141 six years earlier.

However, the revised estimate still didn't take into account the new housing - including 8,400 dormitory rooms - that has been built in the city since the 2000 Census. To get the census to include all those units, the city had to provide the bureau with a full accounting of the number of group housing units - including all city dormitories, homeless shelters, prison cells, and nursing homes, said Alvaro Lima, the BRA's research director. Add in all those rooms and the city now believes the population reached at least 616,535.

Unlike the census, in which people are surveyed and counted, the annual population estimates are a mostly statistical exercise - updating the last census counts to reflect new births, deaths, and migration in and out of a state, along with the number of building permits, typical occupancy rates, and typical housing demolition rates.

Group living quarters are not adjusted between 10-year census counts unless the city or state reports the changes. But the yearly estimates are important because they set the stage for the 2010 count and provide an annual basis for distributing federal funds - not to mention its role marketing data that help companies decide where to locate. St. Clair pointed to problems that mounted with each estimate between the 1990 and 2000 Census. By the end of the decade, the Massachusetts population was undercounted by 700,000 people.

Between September and February, the BRA also conducted a massive mapping project to identify every parcel in the city that should get a 2010 Census form.

"It was very ambitious," said Lima, "and very tiring." Lima and a staff of seven at the agency compiled and cross-referenced about 15 different address lists to plot homes on a parcel map. When the data were conflicting or incomplete, Lima's staff hit the streets themselves.

The next effort will be a massive state- and city-sponsored campaign to persuade people to complete their 2010 Census forms - a particular challenge among immigrants whom the census aims to count even if they are living in the country illegally. College students are also asked to fill out surveys based on where they are living at the time of the census in April.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma..._full_bore_to_boost_2010_census_tally/?page=2
 
Great, so the state is fudging numbers to bilk the rest of the country out of money. I guess fraud (at taxpayers expense no less) is ok if your a politician protecting your cushy seat and gravy train.
 
If we lose a Congressional seat, can we have a vote to decide which Rep to throw out?
 
That would be a great idea, so it'll never happen.
 
Great, so the state is fudging numbers to bilk the rest of the country out of money. I guess fraud (at taxpayers expense no less) is ok if your a politician protecting your cushy seat and gravy train

Mass is one of a growing number of states that are challenging the census estimates, they have an unusual way of gathering estimates.
 
We don't bilk the rest of the country, we are a donor state. We pay more to the Feds than we ever get back and have done so for many, many years.
 
Hub's census total rises, but number short, city insists

For the first time in three years, the US Census Bureau is reporting that Boston's population grew, rather than shrinking. But the city is still likely to contest the number, saying it should be even higher.


"We still feel that they're starting from a base number that was too low," said Jessica Shumaker, a spokeswoman for the Boston Redevelopment Authority. "We're happy to see that they're recognizing our population continues to grow, but we still think it's roughly 20,000 people too low."

The hotly disputed population estimates being released today show Boston's population grew just six-tenths of 1 percent last year, to 599,351. But based on the authority's research, the city believes Boston's population climbed to 616,535 last year. The city has successfully challenged the population estimates each of the past two years, ultimately leading to upward adjustments in the count.

Both the city and state have been preparing for the 2010 census by trying to account for people who may have been missed in past surveys. A poor showing compared with other states could cost Massachusetts federal grant money and seats in Congress.

Secretary of State William F. Galvin, who is in charge of the state's response to the census, said he found the numbers to be generally encouraging moving toward the 2010 count.

"I'd put it in the same league as a weather report - a good weather report, but still a weather report," Galvin said. "It doesn't always mean you get what you predict."

In recent years, the state was unable to counter the census estimates because it did not pay for the studies necessary to do so. The state recently funded research through the University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute, which started by itemizing the number of people in group housing, including dormitories, prisons, shelters and nursing homes.

In Boston alone, the researchers found 12,589 people living in group quarters who went uncounted by the census, said the Donahue Institute's Michael Goodman. If the Census Bureau accepts that full number in a challenge, it would boost Boston's estimate to 611,940.

Unlike the census, which relies on surveys of individual people, the annual numbers are based in part on statistical estimates, including not only births, deaths, and migrations, but the typical rates of housing occupancy and demolition. The Census Bureau does not update the number of people living in group housing between 10-year census counts, though in college-centric cities in Massachusetts, those numbers could be substantial, Goodman said.

The Census Bureau estimates that Worcester lost 316 people last year, but Goodman said his team identified 526 unaccounted for in group housing and dorms. And the loss of 494 people in Springfield, as reported by the census, is more than offset by the extra 1,431 people the census missed in group quarters, he said.

Outlying towns such as Hingham, Rutland, Grafton, East Longmeadow, Chelmsford, Danvers, Dedham, and Dunstable saw greater growth than Boston.

The biggest boost came in Danvers, a town 18 miles north of Boston, which added more than 1,000 people last year, an increase of 4.12 percent.

Wayne Marquis, Danvers town manager, attributed the gains to several major housing developments, including a 433-unit apartment complex at the redeveloped site of the former Danvers State Hospital.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ar...us_total_rises_but_number_short_city_insists/
 
Mass. fears a gap in census
With immigrants wary, undercount would hurt state

After years of highly publicized immigration raids, community organizers and government officials are growing increasingly worried that many immigrants will not open their doors to census takers in 2010, a scenario that could cost Massachusetts millions in federal dollars and possibly a congressional seat.

Although the next census is still 17 months away, federal, state, and local authorities are stepping up efforts to reach immigrants and other hard-to-count groups.

In recent weeks, the Census Bureau has opened new offices in Massachusetts and is preparing a massive media blitz in multiple languages.

Officials are also planning to recruit community organizers who speak languages from Somali to Spanish and teach about the census in religious congregations and schools.

"In terms of the hyper, almost paranoid sense of people feeling vulnerable, we've never had this situation," said Joel Barrera, deputy director of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, a government agency that has pinpointed hard-to-count neighborhoods.

"Right now we've got to start reaching the people, telling the immigrants the census is different than the other agencies."

Since the 2000 Census, immigrants have increasingly felt they were under siege, from heightened security since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks to a major immigration raid last year in New Bedford. Some naturalized citizens fear government officials because of violent repression in their home countries. Illegal immigrants worry about being deported, and many have been taught by local advocates not to open their doors when officials come knocking.

A recent visit to a Chelsea neighborhood showed the fears census takers will face.

A 19-year-old baby sitter from Guatemala froze in alarm on her doorstep when a reporter asked if she would answer census takers' questions when they come to her neighborhood. She would not give her name because she is here illegally.

"No," she said flatly in Spanish, waving her hands. "With all that has happened with immigration and everything, most of the people wouldn't open their doors."

Immigrants have helped fuel what little growth Massachusetts has had in the past decade, and population figures are key to determining public and private investment, such as deploying funds to nonprofits, deciding where to build roads and schools, even where to put a Starbucks.

City and state officials say that every federal dollar is crucial as the state makes dramatic budget cuts. Boston, Chelsea, and other cities and towns have complained for years that an undercount of immigrants has deprived them of funding.

More than 900,000 immigrants live in Massachusetts, 14 percent of the population, according to 2006 estimates. About 1 in 5 immigrants is here illegally.

The goal of the US Census is to count every person living in the United States. In March 2010, it will start by sending 10-question questionnaires to every household. If households don't return the form, census officials will dispatch teams of census takers weeks later into neighborhoods determined to get the answers they need. Typically they show up in the evenings, before 8 p.m.

Graphic Lowest reporting rates in Massachusetts cities
Census takers don't ask if immigrants are in the United States , and they don't share information with other government agencies, said Kathleen Ludgate, regional director of the US Census Bureau.

In 2000, 69 percent of the state's residents returned the census form by mail, slightly above the national average.

But the turnout was lower in cities with a large immigrant population, such as Lawrence, Chelsea, and Boston. In pockets within those cities, the mail return rate was less than half.

One of those neighborhoods with a low return rate in the 2000 census is a triangular swath of land in Chelsea, steps from a bustling downtown filled with bakeries, banks, and a bus stop crowded with workers. Hundreds of people live in the yellow and red brick rowhouses that line the streets, inches apart. They shop at the nearby Market Basket and send their children to school.

But in the 2000 mail-in census, less than half of the mostly Spanish-speaking neighborhood returned the census form.

The 19-year-old baby sitter said that she and her family had lived in the rowhouse for eight years, and that most were born in Guatemala. She would like to study, but can't afford college tuition. But she said she would not give her personal information to a government official.

"It's because of the fear," she said.

Nearby, a 35-year-old painter named Francisco said he would answer their questions if they came to his home, though he is also here illegally, from El Salvador.

But he would like the government to know what his community needs, from English classes to the GED classes he takes at night.

The 2000 census showed that 36 percent of Chelsea residents are immigrants, many of whom are not fluent in English, and 40 percent of people age 25 and over never finished high school.

"I know what a census is," he said in Spanish, picking up his mail with hands speckled with white paint. "It's just part of the government's job."

Upstairs, his neighbor was more skeptical. The man cracked open the door enough to show his head.

"I don't think it's necessary," he said in Spanish and shut the door.

Secretary of State William F. Galvin said that informing the public about the census will be his top priority when the election is over. In 2000, because of ramped-up publicity, the state did not lose a congressional seat for the first time in 30 years.

But this census could be different. This month Boston complained that its population estimates are missing as many as 20,000 people, partly because of college students and others. Chelsea believes that as many as 15,000 people may have been left out.

"However they got here, they're here," said Galvin. "I'm here to make sure they're counted, as the federal law says they should be."

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/10/22/mass_fears_a_gap_in_census/?page=2
 
So because the state refuses to enforce immigration laws, they are crying about not having enough money to support all the residents. I guess all of us law abiding citizens, and legal immigrants, need to dig deep to pay for all the lawbreakers to get a free ride as usual. Getting my citizenship here was a big waste of time and money, I could have had everything for free courtesy of US and Massachusetts' taxpayers.

Yes there is some sarcasm here, but I deeply resent what I had to go through for citizenship, when all these weasels get a free pass on obeying the law, and can't even bother to learn the language.
 
The problem with a broken system that is never fixed is that people get used to it and start to work within it. I am by no means an expert on immigration but I do think it is sad that the state has to resort to this in order to keep it's census numbers up, even though we all know they are going to go down.

Maybe the state should focus more on how to make Mass affordable?
 
The only reason California, New York, South Florida, New Jersey, and Connecticut grow is due to immigrants. The problem is the most desirable areas of this country are too expensive for the middle class.
 
Boston successfully wins Census challenge

November 30, 2009

BOSTON --Boston has successfully challenged its U.S. Census Bureau population estimate.

The city won an argument with the federal government that Boston's population was 620,535 as of 2008.

So far, eight municipalities have challenged their numbers, adding 22,295 to the Massachusetts population estimate.

Secretary of State William Galvin said Monday that Massachusetts now has an overall estimate of more than 6.5 million.

The 2010 Census in April will be critical if the state hopes to avoid losing one of its 10 House seats to southern and western states that have seen population growth.

The Population Estimates Program at the University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute assisted in revising Boston's figures. And the Boston Redevelopment Authority provided specific data for the challenge that added 11,512 people to the city's 2008 population estimate.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma...30/boston_successfully_wins_census_challenge/
 
Boston is now the third densest major city in the US at 12,813/sq mile, overtaking Chicago, which is at 12,649/sq mile.
 
From my experience, even that number seems exaggerated. Chicago always seems to be less dense, especially outside of the city core. Then again, I've never really explored the north side, which is apparently where most of the dense development is. Suburban Chicago is also pretty bad, and it goes from city to exurb very quickly, but that's outside of city limits and doesn't actually factor into that number.
 
Much of Chicago doesn't appear very dense, but I'm sure all the 30 story apartment/condo towers in the center and along the lakefront make up for some of that.

The rest is at least as dense as Boston neighborhoods like Roslindale or Dorchester.

A loong time ago I did a study of the density of all the census tracts in Boston. The South End and Dorchester have virtually identical densities (around 30,000/sq mi).
 
Chicago has plenty of old-line streetcar suburbs such as Oak Park, Evanston, and Skokie.
 
It does, I know, but just from anecdotal evidence it seemed to have very low density outside of the city center, but perhaps that was just the neighborhoods I was in.
 

Back
Top