MetroMark Apartments (née The Commons @ FH) | 3593-3615 Washington St | Jamaica Plain

Hutchison

Active Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
720
Reaction score
1
PNF - http://bostonredevelopmentauthority...on Street/3593-3615 Washington Street_PNF.pdf

Globe article - http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news...80_apartments_retail_near_forest_hills_s.html

A development team is proposing to build 280 apartments, ground-floor retail shops, outdoor open space and 185 parking spots in the Forest Hills area of Jamaica Plain, where other significant public and private projects being planned.

The 300,733-square-foot proposal for 3593-3615 Washington St. would be called “The Commons at Forest Hills,” according to a copy of a 140-page plan filed this week with the Boston Redevelopment Authority.

Two companies are spearheading the development, The Brennan Group, a Beacon Hill-based lobbying firm, and the John M. Corcoran Company, a Braintree-based real estate, development and investment firm, according to a joint press release the development team issued Wednesday.

The plan calls for constructing four buildings on the 2.8-acre site ranging in height from three to five stories. Across the property, about one acre would be used for open space, including courtyards, private decks, a common roof deck and green space.

There would be a total of 7,960 square feet of space for ground-floor retail and commercial use, according to the plan.

The proposal includes 169 parking spots for residential use and another 16 spaces for commercial and retail use. All but about 30 of the parking spots will be in ground-floor garages under the proposed buildings.

There would be 225 bike parking spots for residents and 25 more spaces for bike parking for visitors.

Housing would consist of 44 studios, 115 one-bedroom, 111 two-bedroom and 10 three-bedroom apartments. Thirty-seven of the units would be designated as affordable housing.

The project would also include streetscape improvements such as new street trees, lighting and installation of a bicycle lane along Washington Street, according to the plan.

The developer will aim for the project to receive LEED Silver certification for environmental sustainability. It would be a smoke-free property, development officials said.

Work on the project would start in the spring or summer of 2014 and take about two years to build, according to the proposal. It would create an estimated 325 construction jobs and 15 full-time jobs.

The site is next door to the Casey Overpass, which is scheduled to be torn down next year and replaced with a network of surface roads by the fall of 2016.

The proposed development site is also less than 800 feet from the Forest Hills MBTA station, which is due for improvements as part of the state's overpass replacement project. And, the site is nearby other private developments have been recently been proposed or built.

About a half-mile south, another developer has proposed building a 130,000 square-foot mixed-use development. Across the street from that property is a new 44,000 square-foot mixed-use development.

Two summers ago, a developer filed with the city a proposal to build a five-building, 208,000-square-foot, mixed-use development on a 3.4-acre plot that would abut the Commons at Forest Hills project. The Jamaica Plain Gazette reported in May that that proposal, for 3521-3529 Washington St., is moving forward again after it had stalled for about a year when hazardous chemicals were discovered on the former car lot site.

The site at 3593-3615, where the Commons at Forest Hills would be built, was used for about 100 years by the former Hughes Oil Company for bulk storage and distribution of petroleum products.

"The giant above-ground oil tanks have been removed and an extensive environmental cleanup is nearing completion, including the removal of 30,000 tons of contaminated soil,” the development team said in a release this week.

“The Commons at Forest Hills Station will be a beautiful and vibrant place to live with shops and amenities," said a statement from project spokeswoman Connie Kastelnik.

"It will be truly transformative, giving the neighborhood a more human feel, with increased pedestrian activity that will create its own sense of place and serve as a catalyst for future investment in this section of Forest Hills,” she added.

The property, which abuts New Washington and Burnett streets and Orange Line and commuter rail tracks, is occupied by several partially-vacant, low-level industrial buildings and parking lots and is currently used for office space and to store and sell electrical equipment and building materials.

The property is owned by Cambridge-based Arborway Corporation, which bought the site in 1980 for $350,000. It is now worth about $1.6 million, according to city records.

The detailed development proposal was filed with city officials this week by Forest Hills Arborway, LLC, an entity owned by Richard J. High, president of the John M. Corcoran Company. The project was first outlined in a letter from that entity to city officials last month.

Facing opposition from tenants (bizjournals article - http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/real_estate/2013/07/commercial-tenant-fights-forest-hills.html)

A development team hopes to transform a former industrial site near the MBTA’s Forest Hills Station in Boston’s Jamaica Plain neighborhood into a 280-unit apartment community, but one tenant is fighting back.
Braintree-based John M. Corcoran and Co. and the Brennan Group in Boston has proposed “The Commons at Forest Hills Station” on Washington Street. Plans for the 2.8-acre site includes construction of four, five-story buildings that will house studios, and one-, two- and three- bedroom apartments.

The 300,733-square-foot project will include nearly 8,000 square feet of retail and more than 42,000 square feet of open space. The parcel is owned by the Arborway Corp., a division of Hughes Oil, who paid $350,000 for the site in 1980. Corcoran and Brennan have an option on the site for $3.5 million.

The lot includes several single-story industrial buildings, some of which are occupied by the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (NACA), a national nonprofit advocacy group that provides home mortgages, and Forest Hills Electrical Supply. Both tenants are facing eviction this fall. Bruce Marks, NACA’s CEO, said he plans to fight the eviction.

“We have been in the location for 12 years and the electrical supply company has been there for more than 17 years, we both want to stay,” he said. “Both of us were interested in buying it, but the seller didn’t give us the opportunity. These are long established businesses that want to stay in the neighborhood and the sale will only go through if they can get approval for this a massive development.”

But John Brennan, president of the Brennan Group, said he has a deal with the owner to deliver the property tenant free. “The owner notified the tenants notice last January that he was selling the property and I think they’ve been very generous,” he said

On the location, Brennan described the Forest Hills area as a pioneering site. “Our project is transit- and bike-oriented and this proposal will be transformative for that neighborhood.”
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

I doubt this thing will be built before the casey overpass replacement project is finished.
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

Nice but it will feel a bit out of place until the MBTA develops the Arborway Yard (IF it develops the yard).
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

is it an eviction or are they not renewing their leases?

if they bought out the remainder of their lease they really should just take the money - there is plenty of vacant commercial space nearby. it's really stupid to be fighting this - everyone in the neighborhood is going to hate you if you hold it up.
 
Last edited:
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

I got giddy when reading that this project will put Bruce Marks and NACA on the street.

If you're not familiar with Bruce Marks, let me give you this unbiased opinion: He's an absolute douchebag. And, a bully. And, an obstructionist.

There's something sublime about him getting his comeuppance.

And, there's something ironic about a mortgage foreclosure advocacy group being evicted. In order for housing to be built.

Here's Mr Marks interrupting a congressional hearing about foreclosures. Because, yeah, you know, democracy sux and letting people talk sux.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0PJ7MeBJ8U
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

woah - google "NACA reviews" - people are not happy with this organization.

A bit of digging and they're doing some really sketchy things like placing a lien on the property even though they aren't actually the lender (you're required to be a "member" over the entire course of your loan??? really?) and then there's this:

Each year, members must complete five actions that further NACA's goals. These actions could include everything from stuffing envelopes to storming a shareholders meeting with the possibility of arrest.

WTF
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

This has been approved:

http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news..._280_apartments_retail_near_forest_hills.html

If the project on Hyde Park Ave., abutting the NEC also happens, the area will start to become a prototype for TOD infill. Keeping my fingers crossed.

plus with the casey coming down this whole area is going to be completely transformed in just a few short years.

I also think the SW corridor is going to start looking like this:

this
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

plus with the casey coming down this whole area is going to be completely transformed in just a few short years.

I also think the SW corridor is going to start looking like this:

this


Not in realistic timetable

The pedestrian environment might be similar, but Forest Hills is an exciting area of potential mediaum to high density development not because of bricks and bikes -- But because both the Orange and Commuter Lines stop there; its a station for 16 bus lines and there is a potential eventually for Main Line Amtrak Service in a suburban / semi rural environment [Franklin Park, Arboretum, even some urban farming]

In other words it could be a dense TOD on the edge of fields and forests -- a totally different lifestyle from the Millenium District -- Yet within Boston proper and only a few stops on the Orange Line from DTX.

Its also not much less directly accessible to the Seaport / Innovation District [DTX Red Line to South Station & Silver Line] or even Longwood Medical District [DTX tunnel to Park and then Green Line E]
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

Not in realistic timetable

The pedestrian environment might be similar, but Forest Hills is an exciting area of potential mediaum to high density development not because of bricks and bikes -- But because both the Orange and Commuter Lines stop there; its a station for 16 bus lines and there is a potential eventually for Main Line Amtrak Service in a suburban / semi rural environment [Franklin Park, Arboretum, even some urban farming]

In other words it could be a dense TOD on the edge of fields and forests -- a totally different lifestyle from the Millenium District -- Yet within Boston proper and only a few stops on the Orange Line from DTX.

Its also not much less directly accessible to the Seaport / Innovation District [DTX Red Line to South Station & Silver Line] or even Longwood Medical District [DTX tunnel to Park and then Green Line E]

how is this "semi rural/suburban?" this is already a pretty densely populated area with largely multi-family dwellings (around 30-40k people/square mile).

SW corridor already sees a ton of bike traffic, and longwood is literally 10-15 minutes by bike from forest hills. You can get to MIT in 25-30 minutes by bike from forest hills too. If a cycletrack is installed on mass ave, it would be a very easy and convenient commute by bike. The T is fine if you're working immediately off an OL stop, but for anything that requires a connection (especially with a bus), bike is always going to be faster during rush hour.

oh - the innovation district? 35-40 minutes by bike. (and these numbers are assuming a fairly leisurely pace) - and if a cycletrack were installed on columbus, one could do that commute on almost entirely segregated infrastructure.

This is why JP has a lot of bike commuters, btw - it's the SW corridor.
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

how is this "semi rural/suburban?" this is already a pretty densely populated area with largely multi-family dwellings (around 30-40k people/square mile).

Westy is confusing Jamaica Plain with East Lexington.
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

how is this "semi rural/suburban?" this is already a pretty densely populated area with largely multi-family dwellings (around 30-40k people/square mile).

SW corridor already sees a ton of bike traffic, and longwood is literally 10-15 minutes by bike from forest hills. You can get to MIT in 25-30 minutes by bike from forest hills too. If a cycletrack is installed on mass ave, it would be a very easy and convenient commute by bike. The T is fine if you're working immediately off an OL stop, but for anything that requires a connection (especially with a bus), bike is always going to be faster during rush hour.

oh - the innovation district? 35-40 minutes by bike. (and these numbers are assuming a fairly leisurely pace)

Rince -- anytime you have a good fraction of a square mile or more of Forest and open Fields, Marsh, etc. in your immediate midst the density tens toward that of suburban / semi rural
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

Rince -- anytime you have a good fraction of a square mile or more of Forest and open Fields, Marsh, etc. in your immediate midst the density tens toward that of suburban / semi rural

NYC's central park has a population density of 79 people per square mile. Therefore it is rural.
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

Rince -- anytime you have a good fraction of a square mile or more of Forest and open Fields, Marsh, etc. in your immediate midst the density tens toward that of suburban / semi rural

Only if you look at statistics completely out of context...
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

In a traditional city, basically, up until the automobile era, urban areas end abruptly and are surrounded by heavily forested, natural areas, instead of miles of suburban sprawl.

Looking at density over swathes of arbitrary territory is useless. That's why measures like weighted average density are more interesting: it looks at density from the perspective of where people actually live.
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

The JPNC is making a power grab to help ruin what could be a pretty good Transit Oriented Development.

From their October meeting minutes: "Bernie Doherty said that this development, along with the Casey Overpass coming down, will create a big mess in Forest Hills. He doesn’t like the six-storey height and the boxy look of the project. Also, the 281 units of housing will have a deficit of parking because there are only 180 parking spaces being built. All residents will be able to get Resident Parking Program stickers so they will be allowed to flood the adjoining streets of the neighborhood. Bernie thought the project moved too fast through the process." "Kevin Moloney agreed to looking at TOD again and said that the lack of adequate transit services is a major problem."

Somehow, I think that Bernie and Kevin hang out with "Wacko" Curley and his clan. It's hard to believe that so many people just can't accept anything but a truly myopic vision of their own little world.

Jamaica Plain Neighborhood Council
March 25, 2014, 7:00-9:00 p.m.
Farnsworth House, 90 South Street

From the Meeting Agenda:

Vote whether to adopt the following resolution:

WHEREAS there are numerous transportation, public safety, development and zoning issues confronting residents and users of, and businesses in, the Forest Hills area; and,

WHEREAS these issue arise amidst the sometimes conflicting interests of MassDOT, DCR, the MBTA, relevant city of Boston departments, the BRA and the residents and users of, and businesses in, the Forest Hills area; and,

WHEREAS, the JPNC has the experience and expertise to represent the interests of the residents and users of, and businesses in, the Forest Hills area;

NOW THEREFORE, the JPNC, as a committee of the whole, and relying on the experience and expertise of both its Housing & Development and Zoning Committees, shall take a leadership and coordinating role in responding on behalf of the communities and neighborhoods affected by these complex issues and in the resolution of them in the best interests of all concerned.


Yes, I've cross posted this on the 161 S. Huntington; Home for Little Wanderers
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

The JPNC is making a power grab to help ruin what could be a pretty good Transit Oriented Development.

From their October meeting minutes: "Bernie Doherty said that this development, along with the Casey Overpass coming down, will create a big mess in Forest Hills. He doesn’t like the six-storey height and the boxy look of the project. Also, the 281 units of housing will have a deficit of parking because there are only 180 parking spaces being built. All residents will be able to get Resident Parking Program stickers so they will be allowed to flood the adjoining streets of the neighborhood. Bernie thought the project moved too fast through the process." "Kevin Moloney agreed to looking at TOD again and said that the lack of adequate transit services is a major problem."

Somehow, I think that Bernie and Kevin hang out with "Wacko" Curley and his clan. It's hard to believe that so many people just can't accept anything but a truly myopic vision of their own little world.

Jamaica Plain Neighborhood Council
March 25, 2014, 7:00-9:00 p.m.
Farnsworth House, 90 South Street

From the Meeting Agenda:

Vote whether to adopt the following resolution:

WHEREAS there are numerous transportation, public safety, development and zoning issues confronting residents and users of, and businesses in, the Forest Hills area; and,

WHEREAS these issue arise amidst the sometimes conflicting interests of MassDOT, DCR, the MBTA, relevant city of Boston departments, the BRA and the residents and users of, and businesses in, the Forest Hills area; and,

WHEREAS, the JPNC has the experience and expertise to represent the interests of the residents and users of, and businesses in, the Forest Hills area;

NOW THEREFORE, the JPNC, as a committee of the whole, and relying on the experience and expertise of both its Housing & Development and Zoning Committees, shall take a leadership and coordinating role in responding on behalf of the communities and neighborhoods affected by these complex issues and in the resolution of them in the best interests of all concerned.


Yes, I've cross posted this on the 161 S. Huntington; Home for Little Wanderers

lack of adequate transit services? so, a major bus hub, orange line, commuter rail, AND an off-street bike path don't count?

Also - isn't there an existing neighborhood group in the area? - I'm sure they won't take too kindly to JPNC stepping on their turf.
 
Re: The Commons at Forest Hills

plus with the casey coming down this whole area is going to be completely transformed in just a few short years.

I also think the SW corridor is going to start looking like this:

this

Don't get me wrong, I share this expectation, and view it as favorable, but I have to say, before it reaches that level of traffic, I'm switching to street riding. I don't like to go as slow as that congestion requires.
 

Back
Top