Scotty rises from the ashes

JimboJones

Active Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
935
Reaction score
1
Financial Twilight Time For Towers?

Analysis: Sinking Economics Put Landlords In Too Deep
By Scott Van Voorhis
Banker & Tradesman Contributing Writer

Numbers can deceive, none more so than the current statistics for the Boston office market.

On paper, times have rarely been better, with vacancy rates below 10 percent and tower rental rates in the $60-$70 a square foot range, or higher, for choice high-rise suites in the Financial District.

But if the market has reached a peak, no amount of happy talk about market stability will dispel concerns that a sheer drop may be looming on the other side.

You won?t find such warnings in the quarterly reports, due out soon out, from the major commercial real estate firms. All do a fine job, but spooking clients is not part of the job description. Nor is looking back over the past three months all that helpful forecasting the economic storm about to break.

But real estate veterans who have seen a downturn or two know that a shakeout is on its way. Joe Sciolla, a managing principal at CressaPartners, doesn?t typically sugarcoat his predictions. And he?s not doing so now either.

All those job cuts on Wall Street ? 100,000 to be exact ? may look remote, but don?t think they won?t be spreading up to Boston, maybe sooner now rather than later. For starters, most of the Wall Street firms have branch offices in the city. And that?s before you factor in the toll on the rest of the financial services sector, or for that matter, on the struggling economy as a whole.

The next two years are not going to look pretty for the downtown office market, he predicts.

?I am telling you vacancy is going to go up and rents are flat at best and I think will go down,?? Sciolla warns.

However, unlike past office market downturns, this one has the potential to be particularly nasty.

Lost Leverage

A new crop of highly leveraged New York buyers acquired a dominant share of the downtown Boston office market just as it began to peak over the past few years. Groups like Black-stone and Broadway Partners paid exorbitant prices, using loads of cheap debt, to get into this market, betting that rents would just keep on rising until they hit Big Apple levels.

They bet wrong.

Rents, far from soaring to New York heights, appear ready to settle back into a more traditional Boston territory.

You can forget about talk of $100 a square foot rents until the next boom hits, whenever that is. Think instead of rents topping out somewhere north of $60 a square foot.

Nor is it too hard to figure out where the first signs of trouble may emerge. You need look no farther than the center of the city?s skyline and its gleaming crown jewel, the Hancock Tower.

Broadway shelled out an unbelievable $3.3 billion in late 2006 for the marquee skyscraper and an array of other nearby buildings.

Looking back, it is a number that could only have been justified based on the assumption the tower would fetch ever higher rents.

It?s just the kind of disastrous bet that many Wall Street firms made on the once seemingly unstoppable residential real estate market.

Meanwhile, the Hancock?s roster of tenants, the envy of the city during the recent boom, now looks to be more of a liability.

The tower?s top floors have become a playpen for high-flying hedge funds over the past few years. And while hedge funds, insurers and financial services firms may have been dream tenants with big fat wallets a couple years ago, they are now more likely to figure in the nightmares of overstressed tower owners.

As some of these firms cut staff, or, in the worst cases, disappear altogether, that is likely to put even more pressure on the already highly leveraged owners of the Hancock. Vacancy at the Hancock is about 10 percent, somewhat above the market average of 8.8 percent. Fortunately, or unfortunately as it may be now, the Hancock is hardly unique among Boston towers in relying upon financial services firms to pay its bills.

Financial services firms occupy 51 percent of the tower space in the city?s financial district, Richards Barry Joyce & Partners reports.

As the nation?s financial markets grapple with their worst challenge since the Great Depression, that number should be enough to give pause to even the biggest Pollyanna of the Boston office market.

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:

Introducing Our New Columnist

With this issue, Banker & Tradesman is pleased to introduce our new weekly commercial real estate column, Commercial Interests. Readers can expect analysis, commentary and insight by Scott Van Voorhis. Called one of Boston?s hardest working journalists, Van Voorhis is a seasoned business reporter, who?s spent the last decade working for the Boston Herald and the Boston Business Journal. But he got his business journalism start at Banker & Tradesman. We?re pleased to welcome him back, and proud to offer our readers his unique take on the financial and real estate markets.

? Vincent M. Valvo, Group Publisher and Editor-in-Chief
 
I personally prefer Scott in this commentary role - I'll look forward to these every week. Like all tabloids, the Herald uses its reporting for thinly-disguised commentary purposes anyway, so this feels more along the lines of what Scott does naturally anyway.

I think the Hancock Tower will do fine. Broadway is just beginning to wrap their arms around the property and are still going through the archaic Boston permitting process to bring some life to that block.

In commercial real estate in Boston there is the John Hancock Tower and then there is everything else. Modernizing the experience, the uses and the services will do wonders to help the asset realize its full potential.
 
Banker & Tradesman - July 27, 2009
Hub's Future Towers Rests On Jobless Numbers

By Scott Van Voorhis

Banker & Tradesman Columnist

07/27/09

The twin tower proposal for the Gov. Center Garage needs a series of miracles to come to fruition.Is the Boston skyline finally all towered out?

As a fan of big skyscrapers, it?s certainly nothing I want to see.

Yet for developers pushing the latest mega plans, such as Don Chiofaro, who wants to build a pair of towers next to the Greenway, or Teddy Raymond with his own equally ambitious sky-rise complex plan near Government Center, it may be time to face some cold, hard real estate facts.

A chat I had last week with Bill McCall, the elder statesman of the Boston office market, was sobering for a tower fan like me.

Now McCall, whose storied career in local development goes right back to the days of JFK, is not making any sweeping claims about the future of the city?s skyline.

Nor is McCall, sometimes seen as a market bear but who prefers to call himself a realist, taking shots at anybody?s tower plans.

But he made clear that the trends right now are not ones that even the most ardent boosters of new development can explain away.


Job Loss Is Key

Pulling out a chart from Moodys.com during an interview at his firm?s offices high up in the One Post Office Square tower, McCall points to the 30,000 jobs downtown Boston is slated to lose over the next few years before bottoming out in 2010 and 2011.

McCall, president of McCall & Almy, a high-powered tenant rep and advisory services firm that works with a number of health care institutions, among other clients, does a quick, back of the envelope calculation that leaves me reeling.

All those lost jobs could empty out as much as 6 million square feet of offices and corporate suites ? enough to fill four Hancock towers.

?I think you can make a case that people are going to be making money with fewer people, which is not good for real estate,? McCall said. ?We are looking at vacancy continuing to increase because we just see there are going to be continued layoffs.?

Of course, we will likely only see half that space hit the market, McCall notes.

And while that may sound like good news, it really isn?t.

Companies will sit on that other half, roughly 3 million, creating a new generation of ?shadow space,? a term that became popular during the 2001 downturn.

Back during the late 1990s tech boom, companies gobbled up office space like mad. But when the bust came a couple years later for a variety of reasons ? sometimes related to balance sheet accounting ? they often preferred to sit on empty space rather than putting it out to market.

When business picked up, many of these companies had no need to go out into the market to lease additional space ? they were sitting on enough empty conference rooms and cubicles to satisfy all their immediate needs.

McCall predicts the same phenomenon will work its dark magic all over again, putting a drag on any recovery in the market even after the bleeding has stopped.

Not that there won?t be enough available space out there for companies to pick and choose from, with McCall predicting the downtown vacancy rate will hit 15 percent, expanding the pool of empty office space to a staggering 9 million square feet.

To put that number in context, the Boston office market, over the past three decades, has absorbed, on average, 1 million square feet of empty or new space a year.

That doesn?t mean it will take 10 years to work through the space glut created by the downturn, since vacancy, even during the best of booms, never goes to zero, but you get the picture.

?Once hiring starts again, they are not picking up the phone and saying, ?Hey Bill, find me some new space, it?s time to grow,?? McCall said of the impact of the downtown office glut.


Who?s Going To Pre-Lease?

So how do all of these grand new tower plans being floated fit into this rather challenging office market?

McCall diplomatically left that question for me to ponder, so I will give it a crack.

Let?s just tally up Chiofaro?s proposed Greenway towers, Raymond?s own twin tower proposal near Government Center, as well as long-standing plans by a Texas developer to build a skyscraper over South Station.

The developers behind these grand plans are proposing to flood the market with more than 3 million square feet of high-priced office space over the next decade.

Yet, amid the worst recession in decades, these would-be tower developers are going to have to work nothing short of a series of unprecedented economic miracles in order to get their plans financed and built.

For starters, in order to nail down financing, all these would-be tower developers are going to have to pre-lease much of the space in their high-rises.

With millions of square feet of newly emptied office space coming on the market ? a lot of it at top addresses like the Hancock Tower or International Place ? that?s no small feat.

But these can?t be bargain deals, for to pay for all this expensive new construction, Chiofaro and other would-be tower developers will have nail down leases in the $70-$80 a square foot range.

Yet the few companies still in the market for space will have lots of other options to choose from, with suites at top towers now renting for much less in the $40-$50 a square foot range.

While new construction is grand, it?s not that enticing, especially if the alternative is a bargain deal for space in the Hancock.

?That?s not being a bear, these are just the facts,? McCall said. ?The facts are we are sitting with a very significant demand for high quality space in Boston that could be rented in the mid- to high-$40s.?


Built At The Right Time

But diehard tower boosters will argue there is just little if any new construction poised to come on the market.

After modest new high-rises at Fan Pier and Russia Wharf open up in the next year or two, there will be a dearth of new office space heading into the next decade.

And with the economy by then finally picking up, and companies back in growth mode, developers of new towers will hit the market just at the right time.

A spokeswoman Raymond Properties? proposed tower complex by Government Center noted the project will be rolled out over a decade. With the city?s existing towers now aging and with Boston typically gobbling up a million square feet of space a year, the new skyrise complex ?will be very well positioned to compete.?

But after hearing McCall?s analysis of the market, I am not so sure the rebound will be so quick and so painless.
 
Sobering. So how long will that hole in Downtown Crossing be there?
 
Our friend Scotty certainly appears to spreading himself around. He also has a story on the front page of the Courant about how Boston's hotels are combating vacancies. Believe it or not, he doesnt use the word "soar," or any of its variations, even once.
 

Back
Top