The end of "The Levine Era" at the BSO

Beton Brut

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
4,382
Reaction score
337
I know we have a few musicians and music patrons in our ranks, so I thought this might be an interesting topic for some. I think it's a big deal.

I honestly wasn't enthused when Levine took the baton in 2004. From all of his years at the Met, I thought of him as an opera director, and that's a totally different kind of competency that I didn't believe would translate to orchestra programming. Then I heard him conduct -- the guy knows how to wave that little stick. And his commitment to new music and lesser-known composers has impressed me since. But at the end of the day, you gotta show up for the gig, and he hasn't been able to, and that is that.

To those of you who give a flying handshake about such things, what are your thoughts? Who'd you like to see here as a replacement?

If you think I'm an elitist asshole for wondering, you should know I'll be watching the Celts-Bucks with a double bourbon at 9pm.
 
Harding's a good choice. I like what he does with Britten in the recordings I've heard. He's Simon Rattle's proteg? -- we could do a lot worse.

A shame Osmo V?nsk? resigned in Minnesota.
 
Levine was grossly overrated and his professional behavior at the BSO the last few years was appalling. He was more concerned with the MET and his frequent absences from BSO performances clearly showed that. The BSO always was a side gig to the man. Mark Volpe was too much of a pansy to find someone else when it became obvious Levine needed a replacement a long time ago.

I wish Lorin Maazel had been retained. Unfortunately he isn't an option anymore.
 
I remember reading that Levine was hired as a 'place holder' until the younger crop of conductors matures(no Ozawa ever again - the boy wonder who never grew). I think Levine showed a great deal of arrogance, just this year he planned to perform Wagner in NYC in the afternoon and Mahler in Boston on that night.
 
just this year he planned to perform Wagner in NYC in the afternoon and Mahler in Boston on that night.

Egad, all Society must have been aghast!
 
That would have been demanding for any conductor in good health. It shows what he thought of his commitment to Boston.
 
Boston Globe - March 8, 2011
In search of a new direction
Levine?s departure upends the BSO ? and offers a chance to recast the future

By Jeremy Eichler
Globe Staff / March 8, 2011

And now, the Boston Symphony Orchestra?s time of reckoning ? long deferred ? has arrived.

Last week, of course, brought a rolling tsunami of bad news, as James Levine pulled out of all of his remaining Symphony Hall dates this season, an East Coast tour, and ultimately his music directorship. He holds the post until Sept. 1, but, in an age when music director searches can drag on for years, that?s basically tomorrow.

One thing is clear: This is a mess of a situation. It?s also crucial that the BSO make smart decisions to reclaim its current and future direction after a troublingly long period of artistic drift.

At the most basic level, what the orchestra needs right now is someone who will at once re-anchor and reboot the institution, bringing an infusion of vision, vigor, commitment, and inspiration. In recent seasons, as would-be highlights were time and again passed on to last-minute substitute conductors, you could sense the orchestra?s mounting resentment, simmering below its veil of professionalism. The players are also getting less deft at hiding it. In Saturday night?s Bartok performance under Marcelo Lehninger, to cite one recent example, the orchestra?s playing was too often soggy and lethargic. Levine left this group in good shape technically, but the slow-motion collapse of his tenure, stretching over the last three years, has taken a major toll on the morale of the ensemble.

And this was not only a result of his physical absences. As I noted back in 2008, long before Levine?s back problems became so severe, his own artistic vision began to waver. You know you are in trouble when what is billed as a season?s most inspiring project is in fact a reprisal of the same Beethoven symphonies that are a staple on almost every other BSO season.

Levine took the orchestra to some dizzying heights, but the path to the sublime became increasingly narrow. When it came to contemporary music, as I have also noted, Levine?s tastes were ultimately very strong but restricted. Older high-modernists and a few other lucky composers reigned supreme. Levine also read his biases into the past. In a choice that seems emblematic, the conductor froze out the music of Shostakovich ? a towering 20th-century composer who simply wrote outside of the traditions Levine deemed properly modern. Meanwhile, orchestra administrators seldom stepped up to round out the picture through active shaping of the guest conductor offerings.

So what?s next? The BSO?s official search committee is just now being formed so the field of potential candidates is as wide open as it will ever be. The success of Michael Tilson Thomas?s Mahler performances at Tanglewood last summer led many to wonder if he could ever be lured away from San Francisco, back to Boston where his career began. Industry rumors have also swirled around the possibility of BSO discussions with the elegant yet incisive Milanese conductor Riccardo Chailly. You can be sure the BSO will also be looking at a wide swath of younger conductors, possibly including Andris Nelsons, Vladimir Jurowski, Daniel Harding, Susanna Malkki, Robert Spano, and Kent Nagano.

One refrain often heard from onlookers during the final years of Levine?s tenure was that the BSO should not have to share its maestro with anyone, let alone an institution as demanding as the Metropolitan Opera. It galled many others that the conductor did not live in Boston.

It?s the unfortunate reality however that almost anyone worth considering will likely have commitments to other orchestras, possibly on other continents. The crucial aspect is that the BSO be the next conductor?s top priority.

Among the pack of young would-be contenders, there is considerable buzz at the moment around Nelsons, a Latvian conductor who, at 32, currently leads the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra. Dubbed by the Guardian ?the magician of Birmingham,?? he made a lavishly praised debut with the New York Philharmonic last month, and he is clearly a conductor rapidly on the rise. And thanks to a nice break from the scheduling gods, the BSO will soon be getting to know him.

That?s because Nelsons was already scheduled to be in New York next week conducting Tchaikovsky?s ?Queen of Spades?? at the Met, so he was free to step in as Levine?s replacement when the orchestra performs Mahler?s Ninth Symphony on March 17 in Carnegie Hall. Many ears will be listening for signs of chemistry. But even if it?s love at first sight, Nelsons is committed in Birmingham until 2014.

With so many potential music directors tied up at the moment, we may be in store for an interim appointment. Let us pray the orchestra does not lunge for safety by naming a well-known but uninspired maestro like Rafael Fr?hbeck de Burgos or Lorin Maazel. The bigger fear, with an interim chief or no chief at all, is that future seasons would morph into a disconnected series of generally well-played but boring concerts, without larger continuity, a bigger shape, or a sense of building. After the unmoored quality of the last few seasons, the BSO simply cannot afford an ongoing cycle of disinvestment among audiences and players alike.

But things don?t have to turn out like this, especially if the orchestra makes sure that a serious crisis ? as Rahm Emanuel famously put it ? does not go to waste. Even without a music director, now is the time to finally bring more artistic voices into the mix as a way of oxygenating Symphony hall. Any interim chief, if there is one, must be a bold and galvanizing choice, but there must also be more done to reclaim the momentum.

The BSO should appoint a composer-in-residence, ideally one with catholic tastes, an ability to conduct, and an interest in programming. It should also appoint a resident artist ? a leading soloist who returns several times over the course of a season to explore discreet corners of the repertoire. In the spirit of reenfranchisement, the orchestra would do well to provide opportunities to players beyond the principal chairs to participate in chamber music concerts ? perhaps curated by one of the new artistic appointees. Additionally, the BSO should formalize a link to any one of the city?s dynamic music scholars, symbolically and literally reconnecting the orchestra to Boston?s thriving intellectual life.

The search committee has a long road ahead, no doubt. But the orchestra can keep its subscribers engaged and even begin to restore the good will that Levine?s health saga has depleted ? by taking intelligent risks, by introducing a new polyphony of forceful artistic voices, and most of all, by giving the orchestra?s players a reason to feel invested once more in their own future.

Jeremy Eichler can be reached at jeichler@globe.com.
? Copyright 2011 Globe Newspaper Company.
 
Interesting ideas. I was impressed enough with Susanna M?lkki a few weeks ago that I'd welcome her at least as an interim director. I understand from a couple of friends (one a player, another a program annotator) that she's quite demanding and the the players like her.
 
WGBH said:
The Future Of The BSO

BOSTON ? The Boston Symphony Orchestra is facing a season of change. The departure of its world-renowned music director James Levine has left a formidable institution without a permanent music director. As it considers its next act, the orchestra finds itself considering both Levine?s legacy and its own goals for the future.

Levine announced last week that he?ll resign his post, effective in September. Hailed as the best conductor since Leonard Bernstein, Levine brought critical success and a reinvigorated reputation to the BSO. But the latter years of his tenure were dogged by back problems and related health complications.

Some observers sense an oncoming crisis for the institution, as it tries to stabilize after Levine?s chronic health issues resulted in only inconsistent appearances by the conductor ? and falling ticket sales that some think were related to Levine?s absence.

Other critics view now as an exciting time for the BSO, an opportunity build on Levine?s success with the BSO while adjusting old paradigms and reach new audiences.

WGBH?s Callie Crossley sat down with Lloyd Schwartz, Pulitzer Prize winning writer and classical music editor of The Boston Phoenix; Yehudi Wyner, a composer and pianist who won a Pulitzer Prize for composition in 2006; and our arts and culture contributor Alicia Anstead, to discuss Levine, the state of the BSO and what might come next. Here are some highlights of their discussion.


On Levine?s Musical Gifts

Wyner: Levine came from the deepest sources of classical music. He?s a marvelous pianist, and an overall musician of extraordinary gifts. Certainly not second to Leonard Bernstein in terms of his ability to interpret music, and to absorb it. The amount of absorption, the amount that a man like this has really digested, and retains, is universal. It?s like a compendium of classical music canon.

On Levine?s Program

Wyner: Almost all the great music directors have sooner or later come to a commissioning program of adventurous new pieces? the problem that came up with Jimmy, as far as audience was concerned, (was) that he immediately jumped to something that had not easily prepared and organically prepared by the Boston Symphony in the previous years. That is, a certain kind of very radical, sometimes theoretical music that Jimmy is very partial to. And sometimes that may be very great.

Moreover, he balanced programs. There was lots of music that was not new.

Schwartz: For me, the absolute high point of Levine?s tenure here was the year he did joining Beethoven and Schoenberg on the same programs. So that on one hand, you knew that some of the music was going to appeal to a larger audience and some people were going to resent having to sit through something they thought they didn?t want to hear. And yet, those concerts were so illuminating, because you could hear Schoenberg taking off from where Beethoven left off.

That was a brilliant idea, and maybe some of the BSO regulars resented that, but on the other hand, there was a whole new audience of both younger people who were really curious about this juxatopistion, and there were also people from the university music departments who had stopped going to the BSO because they were so bored with the program, and suddenly, filling the seats because there was an actual programming idea that they were interested in.

The State of the Orchestra

Anstead: With all respect to the difficulties that the BSO administration is in right now, in filling in these gaps, and that the orchestra members themselves are facing in morale, and also what Levine himself is experiencing medically ? that?s all very difficult. What?s exciting, is that the BSO is actually in such a great position, to embrace a whole new world.

They have a robust online presence, with music that?s recorded there? The BSO is well-positioned, it?s one of the strongest orchestras in the country, if not one with the biggest budget.

Schwartz:Crisis is not quite the right word because partly ? or maybe even mostly ? Levine, when he came here, really transformed the orchestra. I?ve lived in Boston since 1962. I?ve been going to the BSO since 1962, I don?t think it has ever been in this good shape since I?ve been there.

Wyner: (The BSO management) are first class in their field, and they haven?t been sitting on ? well, whatever you sit on ? not thinking about the future.

What?s Required of His Replacement

Wyner: We tend to think of a conductor from the outside-in, but how do the members of the orchestra ? or even someone like the BSO?s librarian ? think of the conductor? Also, how does a conductor relate to the press? How does his image project in raising funds? How does he look on the cover of a brochure? The factors are innumerable. It?s not just how they wave their arm and the knowledge of the music.

Anstead: Artistic excellence is the most fundamental quality a new conductor will have to have. The face of music in Boston could of course be a woman. What would happen if someone like an Alondra De La Perra or a Dudamel took root and made cultural connections with younger people?

Schwartz:I believe that the future of classical music lies with women. It used to be thought that young women didn?t have the right kind of DNA to play Beethoven or Bach. But women are the largest constituencies in our music schools and they are becoming the majority of players. How long are they going to stand for the hegemony of the male leader?

We hope that whoever becomes the music director has broad taste, and that includes centempory music, 20th century music, and even early 21st century music

Anstead: They?re also going to have to understand that the audience is no longer a sit-still audience ? that they are digitally driven, that they are immigrants, and that the digital world is her to stay

Role of BSO in the City and Going Forward

Wyner: A symphony orchestra in a city, a major symphony orchestra, stands as a kind of icon and a beacon of civilization. It is a measure by which the quality of intellectual and emotional life is regarded and judged?For that reason, even though it?s attractive to only a fairly small minority of people?nevertheless, it?s that kind of a moniker, that kind of an identification, ?Yeah, Boston really is a classy city.

Anstead: It?s not quite like the Red Sox and it?s not quite like the Celtics, and yet, in terms of our global pride out in the world, not just locally but out in the world, the BSO has just as much reach. This is a world-class orchestra. It?s in the top 20 orchestras of the world. And that gives it a unique place, not just in local pride but national pride. And that makes it an organization that exchanges cultural information, cultural knowledge, reaches across all sorts of borders, which music does, of course. And I would put it on a par not only with the Boston Museum of Fine Arts but with the Boston Public Library System, in creating an important place for our city. Not only here, but beyond our town lines.

Schwartz: BSO performances are not only live performances at Symphony Hall. There are recordings, including some recent Grammy-winning recordings, that certainly are accessible and available to people who certainly aren?t anywhere near Boston and probably never will be?The outreach is huge. And in fact one of the triggers for this recent crisis is that the Boston Symphony Orchestra does go on tour outside of Boston, and there were scheduled performances, which are taking place but without the maestro, at Carnegie Hall, at the Kennedy Center, and at several other places in the northeast corridor. And the orchestra has certainly been to Europe.

Callie Crossley, 03/10
 
Last edited:

Back
Top