Either commit to some wacky geometry all over, or go for some repeating rectangles. This is a horrible compromise between the two.
Peebles continues to be a running joke.
I have to respectfully disagree. That Boston.blah article was a mugging, and it seems they’re just butt-hurt about the lack of parking. Super petty, but it’s the Boston Glob’s ignorant little sibling, so, lol.
Peebles had the rug pulled out from under them, twice, (due to no fault of their own), in a long effort to win this bid (with significant financial investment, no less!). I’m on my phone and can’t find the thread, but it’s well-documented on here the drama of Parcels 12—15, the Commonwealth’s shenanigans, the challenges of decking 3 parcels and converting a “covered way” under the Pru into a “tunnel” (to meet contemporary adequate life safety code along the Pike/CR underpass—yeah, I’m using the wrong terms, but F-Line would prolly know specifics). In any case.
Peebles was supremely dignified through all this shit. I posit they have been both thoughtful and transparent at what they intend as their inaugural project in New England, in the heart of a gateway neighborhood—healing the wounds of Boston’s civic “design” in the 50s/60s/70s era of regrettable auto-centric prioritization.
Peebles had to negotiate with the MBTA, MassDOT, MCCA, MBCR, DCR, Fenway CDC, BBAC, BBA, the BRA (d/b/a BPDA, lol); all the local loonies, abutters, and the general neighborhood cranks; never mind Parcel 12 developers and the Berklee School (who are approved to redevelop the SE corner of the intersection, including the terra firma Parcel 14): through all this evolution, it’s admirable the Peebles final proposal sought to increase affordable housing in a neighborhood with an embarrassingly barren inventory of affordable housing. I think it’s something stupid like only 4% of the rentable housing stock is available in the Back Bay. (Never mind, the $34M or so they’d pay to fix the damn MBTA’s accessibility issues at Hynes/ICA/Auditorium that should’ve been addressed 40 years ago; this alone is a delicate design and funding partnership with Parcel 12, those lunatic condo nutters at 360 Newbury, and the MBTA—itself an incoherent icon of incompetence.
I can certainly quibble with the exterior materials of the Peebles renderings, as shown *at this point in design*, but that’s what the public comment and IAG/CAC processes are designed to address.
And, to their credit, Peebles essentially started from this project from scratch during Covid lockdown after due diligence found some rather unusual unforeseen/undocumented site conditions implemented during the Turnpike Extension and rebuilding of the Boylston overpass between Mass Ave to Hereford. I think I read it’s a 2’-ish grade change.
I found the Peebles response pretty clever from an engineering standpoint (hence some of the strange angles hiding interior issues, due to the grade change), their lead guy quite engaging, and the design team is very open to dialogue with neighbors. The exterior may need some further tweaking, but the overall project is the opposite of a running joke.
Full disclosure: I have no stake in Parcel 13, other than that I live 2 blocks away and typically travel this stretch of Boylston at least four times a day. More, when the Red Sox are playing at home. ;-)
EDIT: I grammar bad … sorry! Fixed?