- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 8,894
- Reaction score
- 271
Please please please never cite Infowars ever again. The NY Post also has lied and mislead their way through this from the get-go too.
Hi. Let me just throw this out here as someone who lives on Earth and is curious .. what the fuck are you talking about?
This Boston Marathon Bombing feeling like an inside job....... but I feel like the Boston FBI unit cannot be trusted at this point.
I'm not sure who is involved but Infowars.com has good information on the site.
The Media has lost all its creditability on this.
...
Looks like multiple people could be involved
...
Not only that NY Post is backing Infowars with a picture of a couple of the suspects on their front page
Man, you've lost it...
I've watched the marathon from this stretch of Boylston Street every year for the past six years. At every single event there is a heavy security presence: police, watch dogs, I think I've seen cops on horses some years too. My point is that every year the City of Boston is prepared for the worst, and fortunately they responded admirably this year as well.
NY Post and infowars are just selling fear. Don't buy into it--you're a Bostonian for Pete's sake.
I'm not buying into the fear. I believe that our citizens and public officials responded remarkably after the blast and saved more lives due to their heroic efforts & quick thinking.
My point was the way the media continues to just report rumors from inside officials and is a very sad fact of journalism. Which is giving our media no creditability.
But I also want to say that if the city or state got wind of a bomb threat I feel like the people should have been warned about a potential bomb threat. At least people would have had a choice to stay in the area. The city & state could have said we have received a bomb threat but we receive bomb threats on every major event. The city should have stated we have most of our resources securing the area like they always due in such large events.
I'm not blaming anybody for this because you cannot stop this type of terrorism no matter how much security you have. But warn people if their is a threat so they have the choice to continue to spectate around the area.
That is my point.
Other than conspiracies, what evidence is there that threats were registered? The presence of security at a public event is a warning to the people in itself that there's a risk involved in being there.
If you're so cynical that you believe they're covering up a threat that was was registered fine, but there's no evidence of that.
Rif. Riff! Calm down. It's all going to be okay.
Just breathe.
Wait, I think it's actually just a deeper conspiracy. The Rifleman is clearly a false flag planted by the government to distract us from the official announcements the government claims it wants us to hear.
Go away. Just go.
Ron why you gotta be like that? Doesn't my opinion count?