After routinely hitting character limits here on the board, I've decided to start a blog. One of the first things I wanted to write was an overview of crayon proposals for extending the Blue Line past Charles/MGH, including some discussion of the hurdles to overcome, and what these proposals tell us about the MBTA network overall. As it happens, I actually wrote most of it before this latest round of Blue-Red Connector news, so I lucked out with having some timely content mostly ready to go.
The final piece is quite long (because of course it is), so I've broken it up into several parts. This first part, posted today, actually takes a look back in time at how the Green Line and Blue Line were originally conceived; I believe that the planning decisions made in the 1890s-1920s continue to have ramifications today, and provide valuable context for our discussions today. I'll try to post the follow-up parts on a roughly weekly basis going forward. Based on the discussion above, I think a number of folks here will find this series interesting.
Since I don't want to just be pushing people to my blog, I'll give a short summary of my post here -- if you are interested in more, please click on through!
Extending the T’s Blue Line west: Historical Background
Planning a "next step" extension of the Blue Line beyond Charles/MGH is difficult because, while there are many possibilities, none are obvious in the way that most other heavy rail extensions in Boston are. For example, while it's true that you
could extend the Orange Line east from Oak Grove or Malden Center to the Saugus Branch ROW, the obvious choice is to extend it north toward Reading instead. There is no equivalent for Blue Line West.
I argue that this is because the Blue Line and Green Line (and their BERy predecessors) have acted like two halves of a single line for most of their history. The gap between the Red and the Orange Lines has been dominated by the Green Line for 100 years, filling in where we would otherwise expect an HRT radial line to go. This "2 halves of 1 line" concept is reinforced by early 20th century proposals that called for uniting the proto-Green Line and proto-Blue Line, with proposals varying over the years from a united streetcar network to a fully converted heavy rail subway (or two). These two lines were seen as siblings from the beginning.
The intervening century, however, has seen the Green Line grow into a subnetwork of its own. Indeed, I'd argue that we can conceptualize the Green Line's current capacity problems as a symptom of needing to "pretend" to be a heavy rail radial like the Blue Line. Due to the quirks of how the Green Line has developed, it no longer can be easily replaced by the Blue Line. Thus we are left with many possible options for Blue Line expansion beyond Charles/MGH, but no obvious winner.