St. Louis Photography

kennedy

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
2,820
Reaction score
7
I'd like to share with everyone the photos I take while going about St. Louis and the rest of Missouri. At least, while development is slow in Boston.

These first few to start are from last Friday, when I visited the St. Louis Hindu Temple and the Mildred Lane Kemper Art Museum at Washington University St. Louis.

Washington University in St. Louis
4519515818_261d54ac62_b.jpg


Sam Fox School of Design & Visual Arts at Wash. U.
4518882355_39597d4abc_b.jpg


4519514196_69b31e9bba_b.jpg


Calder Mobile outside the Kemper
4518881801_e518e87b7b_b.jpg


4518880011_55066e2216_b.jpg


Mildred Lane Kemper Art Museum
4518881345_3ddee48a2e_b.jpg


4519517116_9b4d4b5175_b.jpg


(if you look closely, you might be able to figure out which reflection is me)
4519516640_3b199e3070_b.jpg


4518879405_cae2cfa8ed_b.jpg


4519514602_de5aca3097_b.jpg


Hindu Temple
4518877527_aaa7ae06b7_b.jpg


4518876679_188e3f79bc_b.jpg


4519512132_a1f37d8c16_b.jpg


4519511660_b6d81f12df_b.jpg


4519511270_53bccff7f3_b.jpg


4518874493_0269e37c77_b.jpg


4518873719_2097a34c2a_b.jpg
 
Kennedy, I'm convinced St. Louis has at least one very nice park and one very nice university campus. Can you maybe show us some of the city city as well? Some shopping streets, residential districts, etc.?
 
Oh...um...well you see, we're kind of lacking in that regard. I'll try to grab some of the Delmar Loop this weekend, our streetcar suburb neighborhood right near Wash. U, and named one of America's 10 Best Streets by the APA (I think). Not much residential there, though. Soulard is the other big one, and I hardly ever get over there, but whenever I'm in the city I bring the camera.
 
Kennedy, I think you need to get and explore your city some more. I spent 2 days in Saint Louis last November and here is just small sampling of the shots I took.

I now live in Chicago, and St Louis is no Chicago, nor is it Boston. It lacks the energy and vitality of both places. There's no Newbury Street, or Michigan Avenue. Overall the neighborhoods are quiet and downtown is kinda dead.

But I was really impressed with the housing stock and overall vibe of the city. There were plenty of nice neighborhoods if you knew where to look. I had the feeling that there'd be enough going on to entertain me if I lived there.

St Louis has a lot of potential, despite its many problems. Came away impressed in the end. You just have to reset your expectations a little bit. Though you may disagree...

Took all of these from my car. Enjoy


4521244043_404125ee77_b.jpg

4521245779_4c10733bd3_b.jpg

4521879838_d128323ce3_b.jpg

4521881868_6c1123e883_b.jpg

4521889086_c9cc893338_b.jpg

4521879324_ff9cc6bfff_b.jpg

4521242431_92d96ae970_b.jpg

4521245399_45b45e3593_b.jpg

4521889940_18446a0be8_b.jpg

4521243581_d6880a2135_b.jpg

4521877992_8177d19c6b_b.jpg

4521254529_7db5b3874f_b.jpg

4521242719_426bcc03e9_b.jpg

4521877070_5c0b835b2e_b.jpg

4521241937_96e24fc092_b.jpg

4521881110_db77e9fa29_b.jpg

4521881434_157f3a43bd_b.jpg

4521247389_83423c5b10_b.jpg

4521248713_126702d0ef_b.jpg

4521248247_a3af38a902_b.jpg

4521882662_50ac3fae85_b.jpg

4521249099_c4fdb98925_b.jpg

4521249477_944359c8fa_b.jpg

4521249911_b376300b71_b.jpg

4521885244_8d8682e043_b.jpg

4521250701_fd73698070_b.jpg

4521251105_40970f364a_b.jpg

4521251451_1023e73fe0_b.jpg

4521251817_98b6153bca_b.jpg

4521252209_4cdb2af1f7_b.jpg

4521252627_84bcb65481_b.jpg

4521253045_ed85b66fd4_b.jpg

4521888356_0ef429812c_b.jpg

4521253763_f46c443ea6_b.jpg
 
Plenty of nice architecture, plenty of nice housing stock, not so much in terms of walkable, urban neighborhoods. Like I said, I haven't been out to Soulard (or the Central West End) recently, and those are the two 'best' neighborhoods in the city - and where it seems you took most of your pictures. Even those, though, aren't up to the standards of Boston, let alone Chicago (at least, not in my opinion).
 
Kennedy,

From what I saw I agree. Its not the most walkable or urban place in the county. That isn't to say the city is completely un-walkable. Many of the neighborhoods seemed like great places to walk around in if your out for a stroll, or even if you want to go grab a drink. But again they aren't walkable in the sense that that you can walk to all your services and live without a car.

As far as urbanity, I think the city is quite urban. But its just a different standard. St Louis isn't NYC urban, or Boston urban, etc. Few neighborhoods or places are. But there are trade-offs--pros and cons to that urbanity as well. The city seems very easy to navigate by car or bike and if you didn't mind driving it has a lot of amenities close by.

Like I alluded to before if your judging St Louis by best case practices then it falls short in many categories. But if you accept it for how it is and see the potential then it might have something to offer. I don't know why I feel the need to defend St Louis, but for some reason I just liked the place.

BTW I didn't show the pictures but I thought Tower Grove Park, the Missouri Botanical Gardens, Forest Park and the Art Museum were fantastic.

FYI the neighborhoods I photographed were, in loose order, Central West End, Tower Grove Village, Shaw, Benton Park, Soulard, Lafayette Square.
 
Hmm...maybe we got off on the wrong foot.

I absolutely, definitely, completely agree that St. Louis has a ton of potential, but the fact that this potential is capitalized upon saddens me. I think we just have different perspective when it comes to the city - when you realize what St. Louis once was, what it is today, and where it seems to be going, it's easy to be depressed. At the same time, when you compare it to almost any other city of the same size, especially in the Midwest or the Sunbelt, it is clear how much further along St. Louis is than the rest of the country.

I do tend to compare it to the best the United States has to offer, when it would perhaps be more appropriate to compare it with the average American city. I think that makes more sense, I don't think I was being too reasonable when I responded to czsz's comment.
 
Kennedy,

I think it seems like we're disagreeing more than we actually are. If we were having this conversation face to face I think we'd be nodding our heads in agreement. I did think you were selling the city a little short when you responded to czsz, but hey I don't know the day to day St Louis like you do.

On a side note, I've been enjoying this guy's blog recently. He writes, about the Midwest and cities in general.

http://www.urbanophile.com/

A lot of good stuff there. If you scroll down he has a piece on St Louis, Detroit and other failing Midwest centers, and how they can stay competitive. While it may not be fair to compare St Louis to NYC I think its necessary given the global economy.
 
What I'd like to understand is -- how did a city that once legitimately rivalled Chicago fall so far?
 
Rivalled? Try dominated. The perfect storm of Levitt, white flight, de-industrialization, shifting from rail freight to air and highway, and modern suburbanization. Oh, and the new stadium seating church movement. But that's just my bitter opinion.

Ronwell, I must confess that I don't live within the city, I live in the terrible sprawling suburbs - just a few minutes from what is billed as the "longest strip mall in the world." So you might be able to imagine my cynicism. That Urbanophile blog is awesome, though. Rust Belt cities are intriguing. Definitely an area I'd like to work in as a future architect/planner.
 

Back
Top