Jane Jacobs' Neighborhood

And has anyone read Dark Age Ahead?

I'm a little more than halfway through it. She makes good points, but tends towards rambling, going off on tangents, and being overall sort of scatterbrained. I haven't read any of her other stuff, though - Death and Life...is next on my list (I'd been looking for that, and found Dark Age, instead). I have a feeling that one will be a lot better.
 
There's no denying, the West Village has become an art object of sorts, like our own Back Bay, South End, and Beacon Hill. Desirable, but "closed systems" where there is limited opportunity for physical and demographic change without resistance from within.
Physical change you won't find much of --except in fringe areas of the South End. But demographic change is more fluid, not just in the South End, but also the West Village.

Now that the investment bankers have lost their jobs, what will be the direction of the flow? Gentrification is on "pause", right?
 
In down-cycles the lawyers traditionally grab what had once been investment-banker territory.

Any contraction in gentrification will be at the far fringes.

That is, unless the masses start a crime spree.
 
Didn't the Back Bay have a pretty sustained 'contraction in gentrification' from the 1930s all the way through the 1970s?
 
That coincided with a period in American history in which cities were not in demand.
 
The next contraction is underway, and it's heaviest in the suburbs.
 
I've not seen any convincing evidence (so far) that the contraction in the exurban real estate market is anything but temporary. In fact there's plenty to show us it's just temporary, and the rest is hype. Three weeks ago in Forbes, hits the nail on the head, although Kotkin, having his own biases, fails to speculate that the urban condo market will rebound as well eventually:

http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/06/su...es-kotkin-opinions-columnists-california.html
 
Here's a quote from the article. Isn't a lot of this exactly what we like about cities?

"Lewis also rightly adds that a somewhat different suburbia will emerge from the crash. It will be a 'melting pot,' he suggests, 'not just by race, but by ages and lifestyle.' You will see more singles, empty-nesters and retirees as people choose to 'age in place' close to where they have settled. There likely will be more smaller-lot, townhouse and other mixed-density developments closer to burgeoning suburban job centers."
 
Is America's love affair with Suburbia over?

GAINESVILLE, Va., April 10 (Reuters) - Jean Bell didn't plan to take care of her neighbor's lawn when she moved to this cluster of brick townhouses hard by the freeway.

But the house next door has sat vacant for the past year and a half, and the bank that owned it wasn't keeping it up. So the retiree and her family have mowed and watered the grass to deter the burglars who have hit nearby developments.

"We all have to watch each other's homes because we don't want the property values to go down any more," Bell says. "It's scary, and I really don't know what's going to happen."

Thirty-five miles (54 kilometers) from downtown Washington, it's easy to find signs that America's relentless suburban expansion may have petered out.

Raw earth and blank concrete pads mark house lots that have sat unsold for three years.

Streets remain incompletely paved and poorly lit, the legacy of a builder that declared bankruptcy.

And transient renters have replaced homeowners who were forced out by the foreclosure crisis.

Is America's love affair with suburbia over?

Though the recession has left few areas of the United States unscathed, the sprawling neighborhoods out on the far edges of the United States' metropolitan areas have been especially hard-hit. Property values are falling, crime is rising, and the roads remain as congested as ever.

Some planners say the hard times are spurring a long-term shift away from the car-centric sprawl that has defined increasing swaths of the landscape since World War Two.


Rising prices for transportation and home heating, the declining number of two-parent households with children and a growing disillusionment with long commutes will prompt more Americans to choose smaller housing within walking distance of shops and mass transit, they say.

In this scenario, some of today's developments intended for aspiring middle-class families could become tomorrow's slums, warehousing those who can't afford to live anywhere else.

"What we're already seeing is these new, very cheaply made suburbs showing how little resilience they have to economic fluctuations. I see them becoming not only more desperate, I see them becoming potentially nonviable," says Jeff Speck, an urban planner and co-author of "Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream."

In the Washington region, real-estate agents say many of those who can afford it are choosing smaller houses closer to their jobs.

FEWER PEOPLE MOVING TO OUTER SUBURBS

Nationwide, fewer people are moving to the outer suburbs. The growth rate in outer-suburban counties plunged to 1.6 percent in the year ended July 2008, down from 2.3 percent two years earlier, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data by Brookings Institution demographer William Frey.

A recent survey by the National Association of Realtors found twice as much support for building mass transit as for building roads. More than half of those surveyed said growth should be limited in outlying areas and encouraged in already developed areas.


"There is an increased interest in people living closer to their work, living in more complete neighborhoods, and living near transit," says Joe Molinaro, who manages the trade group's smart-growth program.

One of the key advantages of the suburbs -- their affordability -- is eroding as well. A recent Brookings study of the Washington region found that transportation costs eclipse any housing savings for those who live more than 15 miles (24 km) from work.

Governments are also reassessing policies that encourage sprawl. Developers in Virginia now must build roads through their subdivisions, in a blow to the traditional cul-de-sac architecture that has been a staple of the suburban style.

Many older suburbs are converting their office parks and shopping malls into more pedestrian-friendly development.


The enclosed shopping mall may become a relic of the past. While an average of 19 new malls per year were built in the United States during the 1990s, not a single new mall has been built in the last two years, said Ellen Dunham-Jones, the director of Georgia Tech's architecture department.

Existing malls, meanwhile, are being converted to schools, medical clinics, artists' studios and open-air "town centers" that resemble traditional shopping districts.

"I don't think there's as much will to build in distant suburbs as there was a generation ago," said Robert Lang, a director at Virginia Tech's Metropolitan Institute. "I think it's not as fashionable."

Lang cautions that suburban development has been declared dead many times in the past, only to expand further with advances in transportation. Future developments like electric cars could lead to a new wave of sprawl, he says.

The fading appeal of the suburbs is reflected in the Washington region's housing market, where home values increased 8 percent during 2008 in the city even as they fell 8 percent in the surrounding counties in Maryland and Virginia.

Suburban Prince William county, home to Bell's ailing subdivision, saw a 23 percent decline, steepest in the region.

SERVICE CUTBACKS, RISING CRIME

With tax revenues down, the county government plans to cut police and fire services and suspend road construction. School class sizes will increase.

Property crimes edged up in 2008 after years of steady decline as burglars stripped valuables from vacant houses.

And to top it off, Forbes magazine said residents of the county's Linton Hall neighborhood had an average commute of 46 minutes, the nation's longest.

In an unfinished subdivision off Linton Hall Road, the county's top elected official says the region must attract more jobs and move toward denser, more pedestrian-friendly development.

But that doesn't spell the end of McMansions, cul-de-sacs and other suburban staples, Corey Stewart says. "What you see in Prince William County is not a model that is going away. People really do still prefer the large home with the large lot."

Stewart points out that home sales have doubled in the county over the past year thanks to the rock-bottom prices.

But the county is bracing for more foreclosures as a second wave of adjustable-rate mortgages is scheduled to reset starting in 2010. More trouble is on the horizon.
 
See articles like this are overly anecdotal; "some planners say" argh - and when they do cite stats they do not pay attention to history. The housing cycle has ALWAYS reflected the general business cycle over the last century. Actually just writing that brought to mind a lecture I attended 1 or 2years ago on a working paper called "the housing cycle is the business cycle" - funny at that point the recession hadn't started and the author was asking if the downturn in the housing market may turn out to be exceptional in history for various reasons - nope.
The end of cul-de-sacs in virginia? Sounds like it has to do with the circulation of emergency vehicles, not a revelation about design (at the very least that's probably the explanation the attorneys have in mind).
 
Though the recession has left few areas of the United States unscathed, the sprawling neighborhoods out on the far edges of the United States' metropolitan areas have been especially hard-hit.

In our metropolitan area, that would be called Framingham ... but I don't get the impression that it is suffering at all. Instead, Brazilian immigration is making it a more interesting place than it used to be.
 
Isn't Brazilian immigration benefitting downtown Framingham far more than the "sprawling" parts of the suburb?
 
See articles like this are overly anecdotal; "some planners say" argh - and when they do cite stats they do not pay attention to history.
Anecdotal evidence is stuff people have seen with their own eyes. When we want the truth in a criminal court, we solicit people's anecdotal evidence. Statistics: you know what Wellington had to say about those...
 
Of course there's room for anecdotal evidence; too much of this debate however has been supported by anecdotal evidence and that is not appropriate. You wouldn't base your knowledge of an epidemic mostly on the testimony of a few sufferers. Statistics are necessary when you're dealing with an entire population, you know that. This journalism is embellishment that can hopefully lead people to more rigorous criticism. Knowledge of the crisis in the housing market necessitates thorough investigation, of which anecdotal evidence is the smaller part.
 
ablarc said:
When we want the truth in a criminal court, we solicit people's anecdotal evidence.

I think this is the wrong analogy. Criminal courts, by and large, deal with discrete situations that arose between a relatively small and manageable number of individuals. Evidence produced by one or two people can be completely dispositive; in fact, it can be the only evidence available. The problem a630 raised relates to the kind of evidence used to make social science claims, which is necessarily more diffuse.

So the real question is whether journalism should be anecdotal or social sciencey. I'd say that the nature of journalism - involving constant time-related pressure - forces it to trend anecdotal by necessity. There aren't preexisting polls to cite for every trend.
 
One of the candidates for 3rd Suffolk State Rep was born and raised in the North End, yet why do I fear he's never heard of Jane Jacobs, much less ever read her books?
 
Interesting that they completely ignore how much that area has changed since she moved to Toronto (1960's?). She talked up neighborhoods like that so much that now they are the most expensive areas in the city, not places where diverse groups of citizens meet and mingle, watch out for one another; no, these places are now home to the young urban professions we all loath and the Sex and The City set. This photo tour may as well have been through Disney World's Main St.

Here is a more level headed article: What Should We Learn From Moses and Jacobs?
 
I was at a talk a little while back at the Carpenter Center about poster art in NYC during the AIDS crisis years (or whatever you'd like to call those years in the 80s and 90s), and they talked about how gentrification in the Village happened at a much faster rate than it otherwise would have due to the AIDS epidemic causing so many deaths of apartment owners and renters in the area, and thus the rapid influx of Sex and the City types. Anecdotal, but it makes sense to me.
 

Back
Top