Memorial Drive Greenway Phase III

ccole

New member
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Attended the second public meeting for this project last night. The scope is fairly substantial - 2 miles of the Memorial Drive Greenway from the BU Boathouse to the Eliot Bridge. The project scope includes reworking the BU Bridge Rotary/Reid Overpass intersection (three very early alternatives at the end of the slideshow). The DCR seems very intent on decreasing traffic speeds and vastly improving the public realm for pedestrians and cyclists.

Slideshow: https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2019/06/26/MDG PhaseIII Public Meeting-presentation.pdf
 
Last edited:

FK4

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
2,383
Reaction score
14
Attended the second public meeting for this project last night. The scope is fairly substantial - 2 miles of the Memorial Drive Greenway from the BU Boathouse to the Eliot Bridge. The project scope includes reworking the BU Bridge Rotary/Reid Overpass intersection (three very early alternatives at the end of the slideshow). The DCR seems very intent on decreasing traffic speeds and vastly improving the public realm for pedestrians and cyclists.

Slideshow: https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2019/06/26/MDG PhaseIII Public Meeting-presentation.pdf
My reactions:

I'm glad, but it's ridiculous it's taken this long, given the conditions of the path.

Makes sense to drop a lane on the final stretch, and consideration of a boardwalk is a good idea in places, too.

On another note, the state should have more strongly considered a wider replacement for the BU Bridge. It's charming, but it's far too narrow for the volume, regardless of your opinion on auto traffic or not. The entire issue at that rotary would be eliminated if there wasn't the absurd gridlock caused by that one exit.
 

sm89

Active Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
848
Reaction score
2
My reactions:

I'm glad, but it's ridiculous it's taken this long, given the conditions of the path.

Makes sense to drop a lane on the final stretch, and consideration of a boardwalk is a good idea in places, too.

On another note, the state should have more strongly considered a wider replacement for the BU Bridge. It's charming, but it's far too narrow for the volume, regardless of your opinion on auto traffic or not. The entire issue at that rotary would be eliminated if there wasn't the absurd gridlock caused by that one exit.
It had been working much better until they reduced the capacity on the Boston side with the Comm Ave project. There used to be one lane up and two down on both sides with the change over being mid-span, but the new duel left onto the bridge from Comm Ave took at away. The one lane can't efficiently feed the Comm Ave intersection so it backs up into the rotary.
 

FK4

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
2,383
Reaction score
14
It had been working much better until they reduced the capacity on the Boston side with the Comm Ave project. There used to be one lane up and two down on both sides with the change over being mid-span, but the new duel left onto the bridge from Comm Ave took at away. The one lane can't efficiently feed the Comm Ave intersection so it backs up into the rotary.
The new dual right turn, you mean? I think that has significantly eased congestion at the intersection, and as a side effect also made it much safer for bikes since there's a lot less aggressive jockeying by cars. Before the bridge was redone, I think there was a de facto dual right turn, not striped, but the lane was just wide enough for two cars abreast and was treated accordingly. Anyway, I feel like the rotary side traffic was about as bad before the recent changes... if they could increase flow, they also could widen the bike and ped ROW along the sidewalk, since that feels pretty meagre / unsafe.
 

sm89

Active Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
848
Reaction score
2
The new dual right turn, you mean? I think that has significantly eased congestion at the intersection, and as a side effect also made it much safer for bikes since there's a lot less aggressive jockeying by cars. Before the bridge was redone, I think there was a de facto dual right turn, not striped, but the lane was just wide enough for two cars abreast and was treated accordingly. Anyway, I feel like the rotary side traffic was about as bad before the recent changes... if they could increase flow, they also could widen the bike and ped ROW along the sidewalk, since that feels pretty meagre / unsafe.
Yes, sorry, the right turn. It made the Comm Ave intersection great, but created insane amounts of traffic in Cambridge leading up to the bridge. Gridlocked the BU rotary and Granite/Brookline intersection.
 

F-Line to Dudley

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2010
Messages
5,245
Reaction score
50
Yes, sorry, the right turn. It made the Comm Ave intersection great, but created insane amounts of traffic in Cambridge leading up to the bridge. Gridlocked the BU rotary and Granite/Brookline intersection.
I don't know if I'd call the bridge reconfig a straight-line gridlocking. The absolute worst part of the Memorial rotary is that it's completely unstriped, unsigned, and has absolute zero coordination between the DCR signals on the southerly side and the City of Cambridge signals at Waverley St. whose queues impact the rotary. And so it's left to anarchy: cars making 5 lanes out of 2, perpendicular merging, daredevils squeezing through impossibly narrow seams to find their ramp, and the 47 bus stranded for up to 10 minutes at a time unable to move because it's being eaten alive by the free-for-all. It's like one of those ¯|_(ツ)_/¯ roundabouts in a square in Italy, only much slower. None of that has anything to do with the lanes on the bridge or the retouching of Comm Ave., and everything to do with absolutely horrible DCR oversight of the rotary-proper.

It's not going to be a good rotary by any means, but there are some common-sense things they can start with to tame the anarchy.

  • Paint. There is no reason for a rotary of that significance to not have lane markers. Shoulders should not only be bold but tiger-striped to discourage all that 5-on-2 merging nonsense. The ramps should have prominent arrows or repeating arrow-stripes. Look at how much better-marked City of Cambridge made the Waverley intersection compared to the typical ass-nothing DCR job a few feet away. Prominently-marked crosswalks (see how much wider the Waverley ones are vs. the rotary).

  • Signage. It's uniformly tiny all around the rotary. Most of the "Rotary" shields at each entrance have been missing for decades, and 1 of the 2 still left standing is covered in sticker graffiti. The wayfinding signage is sparse, tiny, and also heavily graffitied. There needs to be standard MassHighway rotary signage here, bigger and sooner wayfinding signage (OK if in smaller DCR style, just so long as it's positioned where it matters). And for the rest (crosswalks, yields, stop lines, approach warnings)...DCR just needs to follow AASHTO guidelines for once in its damn life.

  • Texture. I like how the bike lane permissive-right turn @ Waverley is done up as a notched concrete traffic island. It's durable material if the overall roadbed is in good shape, and resistant to snowplows. Since signage and striping alone isn't going to get quite enough people to behave with the anarchy merging, explore using material like this at the merges/splits to channel traffic in the correct lanes. I'd also rumble-strip the asphalt at the yellow line around the rotary to better discourage the extremely dangerous left-passing games. The notched concrete would particularly make the areas around crosswalks much safer...such as here where a sharper, less-dull/rounded lane split would keep peds from having to jump out of the way of last-nanosecond turns. CAVEAT: The roadbed on the rotary is pretty shot, so they would probably have to scrape all the way to the bare dirt like Cambridge did with Brookline St. several years ago to make sure it has a surface that's going to last.

  • Signaling. At very minimum, DCR's got to redo the bridge lights to triage queues from Comm Ave. or Waverley better. While the bridge itself doesn't get too horribly backed up 1000 ft. from the Boston side, the DCR lights very much do conflict with the City of Cambridge ones 500 ft. away. Some vague institutional awareness of signal coordination would be real nice here. I don't think Cambridge would mind giving up control of the Waverley signals to DCR if the state had a coherent re-timing plan. Meanwhile, studying whether any of the other legs of the rotary need signals is a must, though I'm not personally sure if or where it's needed.
 

sm89

Active Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
848
Reaction score
2
The DCR has an interim striping plan that they're working on for the BU Rotary to be implemented this year. It will formalize the lanes and make it safer, though that won't affect traffic much. The Waverly/Brookline/Granite signal is DCR-owned and operated.
 

sneijder

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
did they really just send one guy out there at 3am with a can of spray paint? A high school intern could've done an equally good job at that
 

HenryAlan

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
2,059
Reaction score
23
did they really just send one guy out there at 3am with a can of spray paint? A high school intern could've done an equally good job at that
These are not the final lines, just markings by the engineers to instruct the paint crew on how to place the permanent lines. This is pretty standard anywhere that the striping involves things like bike lanes or other complexities in a tight fit location.
 

statler

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
7,708
Reaction score
29
So the final lines are painted and I drove through around 6:45 this evening and as expected most people just ignored the new markings and it was the same clusterfuck it always is. Maybe even more so because some people were trying to respect the lanes while the more aggressive drivers were swerving in and out trying to get around them.

Maybe people just need time to get adjusted to the new lines or maybe there will be some enforcement?
 

JeffDowntown

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
2,822
Reaction score
7
So the final lines are painted and I drove through around 6:45 this evening and as expected most people just ignored the new markings and it was the same clusterfuck it always is. Maybe even more so because some people were trying to respect the lanes while the more aggressive drivers were swerving in and out trying to get around them.

Maybe people just need time to get adjusted to the new lines or maybe there will be some enforcement?
I have never seen Boston drivers obey lane markings, anywhere, ever. Driving here reminds me of driving in India.
 

whighlander

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
6,720
Reaction score
16
I have never seen Boston drivers obey lane markings, anywhere, ever. Driving here reminds me of driving in India.
Jeff -- Not even close -- have you ever been to India?

In Boston as opposed to say Bangalore [Bangaluru]
  • First there are no significant number of motor-powerered 2 wheelers
  • 2nd there are No 3 wheelers
  • 3rd -- very very few animals on the streets
  • 4th -- I've never seen anyone drive in the opposite direction on a highway in Boston
  • 5th -- because of the above -- there are generally the same number of de facto as there are de jure travel lanes
1 pix == 1000 words department
Bangalore [Bangaluru]


https://new.siemens.com/global/en/company/stories/research-technologies/folder-future-living/reducing-congestion-with-deep-learning.html
Smart Cities: Reducing Congestion with Deep Learning

Traffic to try your patience: Permanent congestion is part of the streetscape in Bangaluru, India. According to the Indian Express newspaper, it can take drivers up to 20 minutes to get through the lights at some of the intersections in Bengaluru.
 
Last edited:

statler

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
7,708
Reaction score
29
Anybody: "Ugh, my backpack weighs a TON!"

Whigh: "Um, actually, there is no way you could support a ton of material on your back and I highly doubt your backpack would have the structural integrity to contain a full ton of material, and furthermore, in order to fit an actual ton of some material in such a small space it would have to be a very dense material such as..."
 

bigpicture7

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2016
Messages
1,695
Reaction score
13
Anybody: "Ugh, my backpack weighs a TON!"

Whigh: "Um, actually, there is no way you could support a ton of material on your back and I highly doubt your backpack would have the structural integrity to contain a full ton of material, and furthermore, in order to fit an actual ton of some material in such a small space it would have to be a very dense material such as..."
statler, you managed to make me eek out a smile this morning despite this being a particularly tough week. thank you.

you did forget, however, the necessary part about first disambiguating whether we are talking about a metric or imperial ton, and the also-necessary follow-on discussion about the political and market forces responsible for why the U.S. still resists adopting SI, coupled with an anecdote about how he's dealt with unit ambiguities in his extensive international technical travel.
 

DowntownDave

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
305
Reaction score
4
And it is Bengaluru, not Bangaluru if you want to use the current name. kthxbye

PS My wife, with 10 years driving experience in Delhi tells me she finds Boston traffic scarier than Delhi traffic because in India you know that no one will follow any rules ever whereas here sometimes people follow them and sometimes they don't. Thus she never knows what to expect here.
 

statler

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
7,708
Reaction score
29
There are doing some major construction on the median at Ames St.
 
Last edited:

shmessy

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
3
Jeff -- Not even close -- have you ever been to India?

In Boston as opposed to say Bangalore [Bangaluru]
  • First there are no significant number of motor-powerered 2 wheelers
  • 2nd there are No 3 wheelers
  • 3rd -- very very few animals on the streets
  • 4th -- I've never seen anyone drive in the opposite direction on a highway in Boston
  • 5th -- because of the above -- there are generally the same number of de facto as there are de jure travel lanes
1 pix == 1000 words department
Bangalore [Bangaluru]


https://new.siemens.com/global/en/company/stories/research-technologies/folder-future-living/reducing-congestion-with-deep-learning.html
Looks like Storrow Drive to me!
 

cadetcarl

Active Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
411
Reaction score
2
Whoever thinks this picture puts us in a favorable light has never tried getting off the Pike at the Brighton tolls.
 

Top