agreed on the tax breaks. but this footbridge isnt being built for the stadium. its already needed and its already funded. there is much more non stadium development coming to the area, whether it be Encore East or the 5MSF from the gas tanks site.
Isn't it governments job to provide infrastructure to allow economic development? You realize 'mitigation' was just started decades ago as a NIMBY tactic right?
We know what's planned and coming. Build the infrastructure to allow it to happen.
They are showing past performers that played at the original location to show the importance of bringing it back. Same with passion pit and Phoebe bridgers.
another option to the Single Point Urban Interchange (shown above) is to do a diverting diamond interchange. its basically an SPUI but with the Columbia Rd approaches flipped so that all of the left turns (EB to NB on ramp, SB off ramp to EB, NB off ramp to WB, and WB to SB on ramp) dont have...
75 Morrissey (TV studio building) are Bldgs A and B. This is a change of 1 lab building into residential.
the existing office building is 55 (C and D)
the Star Market is 45 (E, F, G and Park)
I think the confusion comes from your use of 'its' and it only being at the arch. which could be taken to me the 'architectural screening' or fascia, which has been the general topic of this discussion.
they were against the zero parking. they are typically pro development in this area.
the realignment is from the PLAN Dot Ave study. this development is not implementing it.
thats not accurate. granted it wasnt as good, but it wasnt 'removed'. and it wasnt just the building that diminished the connection as the site plans evolved, there are other factors too.
the image above has 2 buildings constructed on top of the T stations, which just isnt feasible at this...