Is not just a tentative/working name? Are they actually planning on naming it that? I’ve assumed the final name will be whatever the new development gets coined, if it gets one. If not, “Beacon Yards” or “Beacon Park” should be the name. To me, it’s fine to call something a name like “West Station” when it’s more of an idea/early-in-development plan, but dumb as a final name. North and South Stations aren’t a valid defense given their name origins."West Station" is absolutely a terrible name, and it should really be called "Beacon Yards". Literally not a single bus route can get to "West Station" easily because it's not "on the way to anything". "Beacon Yards" as a name accurately reflects the fact that the station is not on the bus grid that can be connected to anything.