Search results

Without the full CIP I don't know that it's possible to draw a definitive conclusion but from the slides it doesn't look any worse than the past couple CIPs, if anything it actually looks a bit better.

Fun fact, SL3X is really hard to put on the map.

I can't agree more (and not just because of the map). Art on transit is something I'm incredibly passionate about. People rejected the bland and flat functionality of functionalist modernism for a reason, we like to be in beautiful and pleasant spaces and exposure to art and architecture is a...

Is there a different document with other service plans? The 2003 EIS shows no Dudley-Boylston short turns.

bigger arrows?

Well I shouldn't have said that. Point still stands though.

Yes and no. There was (and still is) a lot of BRT that is more just an enhanced bus service with better branding, the term I've heard and quite like is 'BHLS' (Bus with a Higher Level of Service) but that is obviously more clunky than BRT. There was and is willfull, if not lying definitely...

But again, put it into the context of Phase 3. Travel time from Tufts-South Station would have been 3-4ish minutes, and that's with the good South Station/Silver Line transfer. And even today, the street section between Tufts and Nubian is not meaningfully slower than the B branch. (About 10%...

It's always worth remembering that it wasn't intended to be this way. BRT Mania, poor planning, and bad project management brought us here. With SL Phase 3 I think it genuinely could have been 'equal or better' but its entire existence was wrapped up in BRT hype that ultimately introduced fatal...

From the report this image is taken from... "However, the physical constraints in Quincy are such that, until the North-South Rail Link (NSRL) is built, the trunk should only be partially doubled." Which is the "Phase 1" indicated on the map. In fact their service plan is more conservative, 30...

Yeah this is not a minor thing.

By far the biggest killer of frequencies is Quincy Center station, it's an important stop right in the middle of the line. If QC can get an island platform and double-track up to Adams St then it would maybe be possible to just leave the rest of the track between North Quincy and Quincy Adams as...

The new system is online though, and you can tell because there hasn't been a reported signal failure on the OL in like 2 weeks.

I've run into this a couple times previously, what's worked is clearing all archboston cookies IIRC.

My primary objections to the way it's shown here are that the directional arrows are absolutely tiny and basically invisible, and that the way it's shown as a loop around Copley/Arlington makes the route appear twice as thick (and therefore twice as prominent) as the other routes. It's also a...

Welcome to the map, 9. Side note, it's going to be interesting to see how the official map handles this change, this is where things may start going really off the rails. The 12, 16, and 47 are going to be the real tests though.

This doesn't seem to be a new development actually. The SL3X study shows the same thing:

Depends. Are you trying to build an electric rail line to serve the existing valley communities? Cost/Benefit seems dubious. Are you trying to build an electric rail line to stimulate development paired with an integrated land-use plan? The cost/benefit there is going to be a lot better, the...

As promised, here are my notes from last nights meeting for the Alford St/Lower Broadway project: Overall this meeting was kind of a nothing-burger, they didn't have much to present and they didn't generally have specific answers to people's questions. 15% design expected by the end of the year...

I was at the Focus 2050 meeting last night. I don't have too many notes but here's what I observed: As the name implies, it its a successor to the very Baker-era Focus40 plan from 2019, itself a successor to the 2003 and 2009 PMTs If you read each report you notice a very clear trend in...