Crazy thing is I-99 is probably closer to the I-238 situation. It is supposed to extend into NY and the closest available options were I-99 and I-67.
Anyway, leaving MA-128 would make sense. Does anyone actually call it I-95?
With its parent route? AFAIK no. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen, but 101 would probably be designated 193 if it were to receive an Interstate designation.
Well there's this:
Plus the cruiser itself serves as both a deterrent and, failing that, a barrier. And sitting in a cruiser in a breakdown lane is dangerous, too. Just ask Sgt. Weddleton and Trooper Engelhardt.
Re: South Boston Development
Normally I don't respond to posts that are about a month old and off-topic but having worked as an EMT I feel the need to respond. This kind of attitude pisses me off. You see cops on details but forget there's a reason they have GUNS and BODY ARMOR! You don't see...
I'm not too sure about that. Some bands will play both Boston and Providence on the same leg of a tour.
How about San Francisco? Do they suffer from the same problem, or is it generally "Fuck San Jose and the East Bay?"
While we're at it how about Logan? Air transport is important if you're hosting the Olympics. The only project I know about there is the centerfield taxiway.
I can already hear the groans.
Not what I'm saying. I'd like them to tunnel the whole damn thing but such a short tunnel under a congested street? Go ahead and do the cost analysis but it won't happen. Well, unless it's in Hingham.
Therein lies the problem. You could build a reservation from the Cathedral to Melnea Cass but there would be street running at both ends unless they decided to dig some tunnels. While that would make some sense on the north end if money wasn't an issue it would be absolutely stupid on the south...