Best Infrastructure Proposal Nominations

Status
Not open for further replies.

George_Apley

Not a Brahmin
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
4,636
Reaction score
1,025
All members are encouraged to nominate an active proposal for an infrastructure project in the Boston area that is not yet under construction that they believe could make the biggest positive impact on the urban environment.

Infrastructure includes public transit, roads & bridges, port & airport facilities, utilities, and parks & public accomodations.
 
Last edited:

Java King

Active Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
201
Reaction score
88
I vote for North-South rail connector. I feel like we could really change our out-dated commuter rail into a fantastic regional rail system similar to Munich. In fact it's so successful in Munich, they are building a SECOND rail connector tunnel that pretty much just parallels the first tunnel constructed in the 70's. People to the north of Boston could get to jobs near South Station and even more remote locations like Quincy. I know a neighbor who commutes everyday from Scituate to Newburyport! OMG, he must be crazy. This would make that kind of commute more manageable. HUGE job center in Waltham too. People from the South Shore could access those Waltham jobs much easier.
 

F-Line to Dudley

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2010
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
1,293
1. RUR, and TransitMatters' advocacy therein. What a huge victory for the advocacy to have successfully slapped back Baker/Pollack's transparent sandbagging of the Rail Vision. We've got a long way to go, but that project could have died outright in 2019 and they successfully bullied the Admin. into keeping on it. Huge win...huge.

2. GLT. With special distinction to the T's sell job of the enhancements, taking a widely varied platter of quasi-related ops stuff very arcane in nature--things usually a total snoozer to public & pols--then coaching it in terms of meaningful service enhancements that everyone was able to readily get behind. 2019 was the year they sharpened their PR tactics for conveying the importance of "nonsexy" improvements. That's a vital missing link they haven't been able to convey so forcefully before, and it opens up so many possibilities for selling system reinvestment. In '20 they've even been able to play this same template to public kudos on truly obscure touches like Franklin Line double-tracking being an exclusive zero-out of the line's OTP deficit (despite that not teeing up any imminent service increases). Starting to get real good at cutting right to the chase on that self-promo.

3. Red-Blue for showing some renewed pulse for the first time in years. Distinction for the advocates calling BS on the state's sandbagged last estimates and pinning them back to the table. Bald-faced lies are getting checked more regularly and thoroughly than ever before.


I can't abide by NSRL on this year's list with that depressingly Baker-sandbagged proposal and nonsensical routing logic. Congress St. somehow ending up "preferred" Alt. but requiring you to duplicate-build the CA/T Alt. at twice the cost to different/split northside terminals if you want/need 4 thru tracks is the stuff of head-asplodin' incredulity. And the advocacy has been hurt by the likes of Dukakis/Salvucci ranting like doddering old fools into every open mic about "ONE MILE GAP" to complete confusion-sowing about service levels and unintentional undermining of better-organized advocates like TransitMatters. The people in charge have shown enough of their true colors that I think we'll be taking a breather from this one for a few years to clear the air and await some less-clueless turnover on Beacon Hill. TransitMatters seems to be leaning that way, retrenching to prioritize the service-side implementation of RUR as the most-logical 'show-me' for eventually reintroducing NSRL boiled down to its "It's the frequencies, stupid!" essence and cutting out the blabbermouths pushing their self-defeating agendas. Deep future-wise I think this thing has still got legs for getting done right--in part because the public advocacy has shown its resilience to adapt after getting knived--, but no question 2019 was a downright brutal no-good year for NSRL politics at its worst.
 
Last edited:

tysmith95

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
2,637
Reaction score
105
Regional Rail.

And before the NSRL is built, I'm a big fan of the proposal of BRT from North station to the seaport that has been proposed by the city of Boston in slides a few months ago.

Seaport East Boston ferry.
 
Last edited:

Gameguy326

Active Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
293
Reaction score
32
The D/EMU Indigo Line, replacing the Farmount line.

The D/EMU line that would replace the Grand Junction Railroad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top