Best Modern Building Under 100 Meters

D

DZH22

Superstar
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
11,869
Reaction score
30,320
What's your favorite building of the last 20-30 years in Boston or its inner suburbs that is under 100 meters (328')? Pictures are welcome.

My personal favorite is Mass Art Treehouse but I'm hoping the red one with the overhangs in Kenmore can steal the crown. In the meantime, this one always knocks my socks off. I don't think it would work at too much taller though. Could Boston support a 600'+ building that looks like this?

IMG_3156 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3157 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3327 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3328 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3336 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3337 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3339 by David Z, on Flickr
 
In this category, I like the new Somerville High School. Contemporary and interesting, with very clean lines.
Photo from kz1000ps:
51438242151_afd9c82518_b.jpg
 
DZH22 said:
What's your favorite building of the last 20-30 years in Boston or its inner suburbs that is under 100 meters (328')? Pictures are welcome.

My personal favorite is Mass Art Treehouse but I'm hoping the red one with the overhangs in Kenmore can steal the crown. In the meantime, this one always knocks my socks off. I don't think it would work at too much taller though. Could Boston support a 600'+ building that looks like this?

IMG_3156 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3157 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3327 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3328 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3336 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3337 by David Z, on Flickr

IMG_3339 by David Z, on Flickr
Click to expand...

The facade diagram for that thing is sort of neat. Also surprise, it's a vertical rainbow inside.
Facade_Diagram.jpg

Section_Color_Diagram.jpg


I actually really really dislike the colors of the panels they chose (I don't care what tree-form they call it, it's still an ugly color palette. Orange can stay, the rest don't work). And the way they're recessed/extended isn't right - very cheap looking.

But the proportions are spot on. Given how often something tall and somewhat slender gets built around here, total win.

I've always thought this tower in Fenway was a terrible sort of knock-off of it:
1258_0_full.jpg


I think 212 Stuart St has potential to be my favorite at this scale once it's complete. But man, trying to run through others in Boston that have a lot of architectural merit had me disappointed...

2_212-Stuart_Luxigon_01_NW-View-1800x2400.jpg



The Bolling building in Roxbury is nice as well. Has a different kind of presence, more engrained and grafted, than these more standalone ones.

IMG_6246.jpg
 
Last edited:
#bancars said:
All good mentions thus far. I'm partial to the Gables Seaport building:
Click to expand...

A little bit surprised by that one.

Bananarama said:
I've always thought this tower in Fenway was a terrible sort of knock-off of it:
Click to expand...

Hah, I like this tower a lot.

Blackbird said:
Absolutely this new-ish one at Devonshire and Quaker:
Click to expand...

Definitely... that whole remodel and expansion came out fantastically.

Personally I like One Seaport and The Anthony's Pier 4 replacement building.
 
Ooh ok when I looked it said 290' but thats probably its pre mech floor cheater height we see so often for anti nimby measures.
 
stick n move said:
Ooh ok when I looked it said 290' but thats probably its pre mech floor cheater height we see so often for anti nimby measures.
Click to expand...

Exactly. It's even drawn wrong on the diagrams because we figured it out later. They left out the whole top portion from the originally stated height!
1631293416152.png
 
Blackbird said:
Absolutely this new-ish one at Devonshire and Quaker:

46 Devonshire St - Google Maps
Click to expand...

What's really neat about that to me is that it's the same use/controlling entity--hotel operator--spanning both the original early 1900s building and the new building they put up on that previously empty parcel.

(As opposed to, say, a totally new office tower put up abutting an early 1900s office tower, but both owned by separate landlords/developers, and thus both alienated from each other than what their side-by-side facades communicate to the outside world)

I'm guessing that hotel guests have no clue, as they're traversing one of the corridors that span both buildings, when they've crossed the threshold from the old building to the new one... or would they? (would the architect/interior decorator have left "easter eggs" that subtly or not-so-subtly indicate when a guest has crossed the threshold?)
 
Definitely, for me, the Mass Art Treehouse (DZ posted great pics) and the pier 4 Condo building. It’s a most unusual landscaper type building with a variety of materials, textures, and angles. It basically stands alone, seemingly jutting out over the harbor exposed on three sides, plus being surrounded by the new harbor Walk addition which adds to it’s interest.
C6E89D54-15D7-4A61-A4CA-D85E6676C7CD.jpeg
9413D518-3F46-413C-8C2F-BBF42BEAEEA7.jpeg
2026C199-7DC9-46CF-BEBB-00798A277C63.jpeg
280E7E20-F378-436F-B465-0E189FA8B055.jpeg
E073E139-6E3F-49DD-8828-4EC41BE80DDD.jpeg
3F874A33-5EC6-4011-A857-AADA79BA9FC5.jpeg
DE9F82E4-5A21-4BBA-84E3-7D27621AC3F4.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I had never noticed that was a pomo building before, interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top