I sat and ate many lunches next to the Fed and it definitely grew on me. It has this spartan retro future vibe, like sets from Bladerunner and JJ Abrams' Star Trek had a baby, and that is very different than other Fed buildings. The others rely on stolid grandeur, Greco Roman and Baroque piles meant to convey in stone the Fed's permanence. Ours is totally left of center and truly unique.
Google is your friend:At risk of being off topic - why is that federal reserve building so tall/ big ? Is it filled ? How many people can possibly work there ? Btw (I love the building, so Boston so iconic in design and stature, uniquely timeless)
What? Is this sarcasm?Important to differentiate the undeniably iconic and distinctive sculptural form of the tower from the disaster that is the plaza/street-level interaction.
The plaza is as bleak, windswept, lonely, anti-human, inhospitable (though mercifully on a smaller scale) as City Hall Plaza was (but hopefully won't be, post-renovation). You surely experienced that intimately during all of said lunches.
Now, we all know the rationale/justification for said conditions--maintaining the Fed's security 24/7. But does that mean conditions have to be like that permanently? Or can GSA, the Greenway, MassDOT, etc. come together to think of ways to creatively humanize the space without sacrificing security mandates? A tall order, perhaps...
Agreed. The Boston Fed plaza is the very best example of security landscaping I have seen anywhere. Highly functional as a security barrier, it still creates enviting landscaped areas and street interaction. People use and ENJOY the area a lot.What? Is this sarcasm?
The landscaping around the Fed is pretty much Exhibit A of how government/security buffers SHOULD be designed in order to best foster permeability and street life. "Bleak, windswept, lonely, anti-human, [and] inhospitable" it is not. Move along Atlantic Ave (and to a somewhat lesser extent Summer St) and you'll see plenty of lush, well-landscaped, thoughtfully designed, and welcoming spaces all incorporated into the Fed buffer. Parts of it come across as basically a better-maintained-Greenway, and one can easily each lunch on the Fed grounds and not even realize they're in a Federal security area. Compare that to just about any other Federal building (e.g., Kennedy, O'Neil, and Volpe just in urban Boston), and the Fed is top of its class.
The Congress St and Dot Ave fronts are not nearly as good. But their shortcomings (which are 100% typical for Federal buildings) just show how much better the Atlantic and Congress St frontages are.
City Hall Plaza post-renovation aspires to be the Boston Fed. I wouldn't be surprised if the docs for the City Hall Plaza redesign cite the Fed as inspiration.
Now the need for security anything is another question, but if you're going to have security buffers the Boston Fed is the way to implement them.
What? Is this sarcasm?
The landscaping around the Fed is pretty much Exhibit A of how government/security buffers SHOULD be designed in order to best foster permeability and street life. "Bleak, windswept, lonely, anti-human, [and] inhospitable" it is not. Move along Atlantic Ave (and to a somewhat lesser extent Summer St) and you'll see plenty of lush, well-landscaped, thoughtfully designed, and welcoming spaces all incorporated into the Fed buffer. Parts of it come across as basically a better-maintained-Greenway, and one can easily each lunch on the Fed grounds and not even realize they're in a Federal security area. Compare that to just about any other Federal building (e.g., Kennedy, O'Neil, and Volpe just in urban Boston), and the Fed is top of its class.
The Congress St and Dot Ave fronts are not nearly as good. But their shortcomings (which are 100% typical for Federal buildings) just show how much better the Atlantic and Congress St frontages are.
City Hall Plaza post-renovation aspires to be the Boston Fed. I wouldn't be surprised if the docs for the City Hall Plaza redesign cite the Fed as inspiration.
Now the need for security anything is another question, but if you're going to have security buffers the Boston Fed is the way to implement them.
Everything about the architecture and design of the Boston Fed is atrocious and hideous.
That includes the plaza, which would be lovely in an office park in Waltham.
It also includes the building itself, which looks like something Mussolini would've built had he lived 25 years later than he did and is a smear on the skyline.
OK really at least try to be reasonable. You don't provide "streetscape" in a Federal Reserve Bank building. It is just not done due to the security risk. Fed buildings so not do mixed use/street level retail....I dont get the love for the Fed either. The tower looks like it was inspired by an old school laundry washboard. The base and plaza are typical streetscape-killing brutalist crap.
Sorry for the ot btw.
At risk of being off topic - why is that federal reserve building so tall/ big ? Is it filled ? How many people can possibly work there ? Btw (I love the building, so Boston so iconic in design and stature, uniquely timeless)
Also note that unlike other government buildings, the Fed complex is owned by the Federal Reserve Bank (not the GSA) and is assessed as Commercial Class A property (not U.S. Government property / exempt). So the Boston Fed pays full property taxes on their building like any other commercial landlord would; other government buildings pay no property tax to the City.We really should move the Federal Reserve Bank discussion elsewhere, but I have some personal knowledge relevant to this question. Not every person in that building works for the Bank. When I worked there, it was in a private sector job, for a company that wasn't even banking industry. There are consultants, lawyers, and non-banking sector financial services jobs in that building along with the government jobs.