Mayor Walsh's backing bodes well for Cleveland Circle plan, despite group's objections
Thomas Grillo
Real Estate Editor-
Boston Business Journal
Despite neighborhood opposition to a plan that would replace the shuttered Cleveland Circle Cinema in Brighton with an $80 million mixed-use development, the Walsh administration appears poised to approve the controversial project.
“It’s a good project and there has been some changes made,” said Mayor Martin J. Walsh during an interview Wednesday. “People have a right to have a voice in the community. If we are building a 60-story tower in an area that’s zoned for three stories, then that’s too much density. But here we are talking about a development that will result in a revitalization of the Cleveland Circle area.”
The mayor's comments came the morning after members of a city-appointed panel and the developer of a plan to redevelop the cinema site clashed during a meeting over the proposed density of the apartment and hotel project.
Boston Development Group of Newton presented its most recent plan to replace the shuttered cinema site at 399 Chestnut Hill Ave. with a mixed-use residential, hospitality and retail complex. But critics at Tuesday's meeting said the latest version was virtually the same as previous iterations, noting that the plan still calls for a 218,520-square-foot development that would feature two buildings — one five stories and the other six stories — housing a 95,030-square-foot, 162-room Hilton Garden hotel as well as 92 apartments totaling 109,490 square feet. The project also calls for 14,000 square feet of ground floor retail space and 188 parking spaces.
The cinema closed in 2008 after a 68-year run. BDG has an agreement to purchase the property for an undisclosed amount from National Amusements, pending project approval. Today, a portion of the property is occupied by an Applebee’s restaurant that would be razed to make way for the development. The theater and restaurant parcels are assessed at $4.1 million.
Last night’s meeting of the Cleveland Circle Impact Advisory Group and Boston Development Group at the Alexander Hamilton School came a month after the Boston Redevelopment Authority removed the project from its agenda amid neighborhood opposition. Residents say while they support the project, it is too dense and will exacerbate traffic problems in Cleveland Circle.
During the two-hour session, ADD Inc. architect Larry Grossman outlined a few changes that included a modest redesign that increased the setbacks of the buildings by nearly 14 feet from five feet. The new design reconfigured the hotel’s ground floor to include a restaurant that opens to an outdoor dining terrace that overlooks Cassidy Park.
Five of the six IAG members said the changes fail to address the density issue.
“I believe that we really need to revisit a much lower building ... in order to achieve a harmony,” said IAG member Mary Cronin. “The original proposal called for a four-story building on that site. The alternative is to reduce the number of apartment units which would be a good thing.”
But John Meunier, Boston Development Group's vice president of project management and development, dismissed the plea to lower the apartment building by one story, or as many as 10 units.
“If we reduce the units by this relatively small number, the impact on traffic is not significant,” he said. “We have been in a position where we are asked to do additional things based on a certain project program. After we agreed to do those additional things, then at the next meeting there’s a call for us to reduce density further. It’s a cycle that continues to repeat and we are at the point that we believe that improving the Cleveland Circle intersection is a very positive for the community and the project and we would like to do that. But we are doing it in a package that is requesting 92 units.”
Anabela Gomes, another IAG member, disagreed with the majority and said she favored the development.
“I think this project is great,” she said. “I’m fine with the height.”
The BRA has not yet decided when the project will be reconsidered for a review and potential approval by its board.