BostonUrbEx
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 4,340
- Reaction score
- 128
I think your harbor routes are more viable than your river ones b/c they can serve travel patterns that are both unwalkable/unbikeable and also poorly served by transit.
Chelsea: Your proposed location would serve the neighborhood much better than past efforts to run boat service out of the dock at the bottom of Admiral's Hill. The closer you could get the downtown end of the route to South Station, the better I think.
Eastie: Since even a ferry out of Central Square would be in competition with the Blue Line, I think you would want to bring the downtown end of that route closer to South Station as well. Having it serve Long Wharf means you've provided a comparable trip for everyone who lives as close to Central Square as they do to Maverick, and are also destined for the Long Wharf area. For everyone else destined for other parts of downtown or other rapid transit lines, a Central Sq-Long Wharf ferry would not be competitive with the Blue Line. Providing a connection to the Red Line at South Station and that end of the Financial Dist would start to increase the size of the market I think.
Winthrop: Maybe shift the Winthrop dock 1/4 mile west so it serves a larger walk in market and provides decent access to Winthrop center?
Yeah, I was thinking of how to connect them with South Station though, as it doesn't seem viable given the low bridges (assuming these will be decent sized ferries). Assuming they eventually remove the Northern Ave Bridge, or even replace it with a lofty pedestrian bridge, you can only go as far as Seaport Blvd.
North Station is an option, though, if access is improved. Long Wharf can probably see more service with or without improvement. Maybe split the Chelsea service between the two while all Central Square service goes to North Sta.
Also, combined with my hopes and dreams of Aquarium being the future Central Station and I thought Long Wharf was best.