City Council Proposal Limiting Students to 4 per Apt.

briv

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
2,083
Reaction score
3
From today's Globe:

The Boston Globe said:
CITYWIDE
Off campus, council says, five's a crowd

By Richard Thompson, Globe Correspondent | March 2, 2008
The rules of the Boston student housing game may be about to change, big-time.
An amendment to the city's zoning code that was passed unanimously by the City Council in December aims to limit the number of college students who can live together in a residential area to four, regardless of the size of the unit.
The proposal, originally sponsored by City Councilor Michael Ross, changes the definition of family in the zoning code to exclude five or more unrelated students. An updated version sparing graduate students from the limit passed muster with the Boston Redevelopment Authority last week, clearing the way for a public hearing with the city's zoning commission March 12.
Just what Mayor Thomas M. Menino thinks about the proposal is unclear. A reporter's call to his office last week was redi rected to the BRA.
About 13,000 full-time undergraduate students attending area universities live off campus, according to BRA figures.
Ross, in a Feb. 19 presentation before the Allston Civic Association and in an interview with the Globe last week, said he was not certain whether the proposed legislation would apply to students already locked into a lease.
The amendment, he said, is intended to keep landlords from converting spaces in large, multibedroom homes, such as a dining room or a back porch, into additional bedrooms that would draw more students and a higher monthly rent.
"This is not so much a behavioral issue," said Ross, who represents Beacon Hill, Back Bay, and Mission Hill. "It's an economic equality, leveling of the playing field," designed for families to be able to compete with student budgets.
The proposed occupancy limit has gained traction with several neighborhood groups, including the Allston Civic Association and the Community Alliance of Mission Hill, and has also been backed by representatives of Northeastern University and the Wentworth Institute of Technology.
"The real problem is these houses become a source of revenue for people, and they know people will pay more for a house because they can get a high rent out of it," said Paul Berkeley, Allston Civic Association president.
With Ross's legislation in place, he continued, "It might not be so attractive to the absentee landlords, and maybe they could either sell the home to a family or turn it into condominiums for a better use than what we're getting out of them now."
It would not please entrepreneurs like Matt Hayden, however. Hayden, a BU sophomore studying finance, started working part time as a real estate agent last fall for Boardwalk Realties in Allston.
His clients have been mostly college students who are renting for the first time, looking for off-campus housing in a neighborhood known for its relatively affordable rates, multi-bedroom homes, and popular restaurants and bars.
Hayden said he has already passed papers on a half-dozen spots in Allston/Brighton scheduled for a Labor Day move. "I just rented a six-bedroom apartment down the street to a group of six guys," he said. "If that legislation is passed, I don't know how the landlords are going to make enough to pay their mortgages and get the rent that they're going to get."
Real estate representatives say they are concerned about the proposal's enforceability and potential consequences.
"Once the students are in, they can bring in a couple more kids," said Lenore Monello Schloming, president of the Cambridge-based Small Property Owners of America.
Schloming and others speculated that the zoning change could create a housing shortage and increase competition among student tenants.
"It's like musical chairs," said Greg Vasil, chief executive of the Greater Boston Real Estate Board. "You take away a chair and somebody's going to be left standing."
Enrique Silva, an urban affairs and city planning professor at BU, said he believes the proposal would essentially create "a second-class resident."
"The biggest issue here," he said, "is that it's trying to control leases and occupancy and density of uses, and the way that zoning is set up now, you can control density and occupancy issues, but they're across the board. It's the legislation of the actual space, not regulating the occupant - regulating the use and density of a space blind to the type of users."
Silva is skeptical that the legislation, if it becomes law, will ever amount to much.
"Does this just amount to political grandstanding," he asked, "or are they going to put the money and the needed resources into actually enforcing this?"
Jeffrey Doggett, on the other hand, sees value in it. The Northeastern director of government relations and community affairs believes the proposal would create more of a "give-and-take" between students and landlords, who in some cases, he said, "are buying these triple-deckers in Mission Hill and setting a rental price that is way beyond what would normally be paid."
"The biggest effect it'll have is that owners will start thinking twice about what the rent will be and what upkeep they're going to have," Doggett said. "I would envision a scenario where, if you can't market your unit as the only unit that can have seven people in it, the choice is going to be a lot greater and therefore they're going to have to provide better upkeep of their building."
While Northeastern currently is in the midst of a 1,200-student dorm project, Boston College is planning to spend $1.6 billion over the next decade to expand its Chestnut Hill campus as part of its 10-year master plan.
The plan calls for the creation of dormitories for 610 students to allow more undergraduates to live on campus, a longtime priority for Mayor Menino. (How it will eventually shake out is very much up in the air: Late last month, the city urged the school to back off its notion of housing 500 of those students on the archiocese's old Brighton land.)
But in conjunction with its building plans, BC officials have proposed a contingency that would restrict its students from leasing one- or two-family homes in Brighton, according to college spokesman Jack Dunn, who added that it could be enforced by denying registration or through strict sanctioning of policy offenders.

Under the proposal, Dunn said, BC could flag students who register for class using an address that falls within a specific block or section of the neighborhood that is known for having high-occupancy housing.
dingbat_story_end_icon.gif
 
It's going to push up rent and cause a shortage.

But thanks to our lack of a metropolitan government, students can still live 17 to an apartment in Somerville!
 
Then we need to build more dorms. Students have always pushed up rents and caused shortages.
 
It's going to push up rent and cause a shortage.

But thanks to our lack of a metropolitan government, students can still live 17 to an apartment in Somerville!

Shouldn't you be blamming Somerville for this.
 
This is stupid. Enforce the laws you already have, because this will not stop students from renting in the same areas. Only now, there will be 4 on the lease, but still 6 kids living there.

They do need to make more dorms, but they get denied in BC's case.
 
Now that'll keep you damned kids off my lawn!

The city really needs to do more inspections of rental units to push scumbag landlords out of the business and keep student's violations of leases down. I really think the city must mandate a percentage of students whom universities must provide dorm, not leased, space.

It really isn't fair for universities to dump their students on neighborhoods that don't want them. On the flip side, it's unfair for Universities leave their students no choice but to pay rent to slumlords for unsafe or unsanitary conditions.
 
If you haven't noticed, the universities have picked up some slack on this, which is why the skyline is getting punched by massive new BU and NEU dorms.

Pity the NIMBYs for not allowing that 30 story private dorm on Huntington, though. It probably could have housed half of East Fenway!
 
Then we need to build more dorms. Students have always pushed up rents and caused shortages.

Build, where, exactly? Through sheer force of size, NEU and BU managed to build towers. The smaller schools (Colleges of the Fenway, for example) that have on- and off-campus populations have nowhere to build except up. But that's not allowed*.

So, it's a no-win situation that Mr. Ross is making worse. If he was truly interested in easing the off-campus crunch, he would be putting more effort into finding solutions that all parties find agreeable (i.e., College X gets to build a 10 story building, instead of a 7 story building. In return, they cap their enrollment for 10 years, with incremental increases after. Not the best example, but it's a starting point, right?)



* NOTE: Emerson is an exception. They've done an admirable job in their primarily commercial neighborhood, where there aren't too many neighborhood loonies to argue with what they want to do.
 
In southwest Berlin there's this huge Orwellian housing project called the "Studentendorf" (Student's Village) where something like a third of the city's university students are housed. Dystopian as it sounds, something like that (built up on the UMass peninsula perhaps?) might be a good short term solution...
 
If you haven't noticed, the universities have picked up some slack on this, which is why the skyline is getting punched by massive new BU and NEU dorms.

Pity the NIMBYs for not allowing that 30 story private dorm on Huntington, though. It probably could have housed half of East Fenway!

Are you talking about the Grandmarc?
 
* NOTE: Emerson is an exception. They've done an admirable job in their primarily commercial neighborhood, where there aren't too many neighborhood loonies to argue with what they want to do.

Emerson's done a great job with adaptive re-use (130 Tremont and the Little Building), preservation (the Majestic Theatre), and added a decent new building (the Piano Row dorm). The Paramount project is another winner.
 
They now also own the Colonial Theatre building. I think they're using the upper floors for dorm space, while continuing to lease the theatre itself to Live Nation for commercial stage shows.
 
I know, have Assembly Sq be a giant student village! You can built towers and you don't need new schools! Same for Wellington. In fact, wasn't Malden throwing around some proposal some years back to turn downtown into a student village?

My pie in the sky idea is to turn the Watertown Arsenal Mall (the one one across the street) into a massive student village connected to the Green Line or Red Line.
 
I know, have Assembly Sq be a giant student village! You can built towers and you don't need new schools!

Some investors formally proposed exactly that. And some people still think the city of Somerville should have selected that proposal instead of the one from Federal Realty and IKEA.

(note: the Watertown Mall and Arsenal Mall are two different malls on opposite sides of Arsenal Street. Which one do you want to get rid of?)
 
I believe Watertown has the more 'strip mall' feeling to it and (while it contains a Target and Best Buy) and would be missed *less.*

Also, speaking of privately built dorms, weren't all those proposed shot down in rapid succession?
 
(note: the Watertown Mall and Arsenal Mall are two different malls on opposite sides of Arsenal Street. Which one do you want to get rid of?)

Heh, I forgot the 'and'. I'd get rid of both of them and mix the retail in with the housing.
 
What bothers me is that this proposal seems to be a bit mean spirited. Particularly if it is somehow meant to keep students out of neighborhoods which they have as much right as the next guy to live.
 
This is coming from Councilor Ross I believe. He's the same guy who thinks Cambridge St should be in the Beacon Hill historic district. I liked this guy at first, but I'm just about done with him. The proposal's boarderline unenforceable, will take away focus from the real problem (trash and late/loud parties), and will cause more housing to be taken by students at the expense of the families Ross claims to be looking out for.
 
this passed 9-0 today, so it looks like i am breaking the law.
 
Is this a zoning law? Zoning laws generally cover only future uses and not current ones.
 

Back
Top