JohnAKeith
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2008
- Messages
- 4,320
- Reaction score
- 63
My Patch column this week (Tuesday) will be about significant development projects constructed during the past sixty years in Boston that emphasize what was going on in our city during that period of time.
So, in the 1960's, it was the second decade of urban renewal. Scollay Square was torn down and Government Center went up. Government Center has a special significance because of what it represents about what the city was going through at the time. Renewal. Destruction. Class / Race relations. National and World events.
The 1950's, nothing came to mind but I might use the first John Hancock Tower, constructed 1947, with the idea that insurance companies carried the city through while it was deteriorated. Or, maybe Mass Mutual, since they had the first mutual fund in the state (beating Fidelity, I believe).
I don't want to b cliched, though. Don't want to use the Hancock, because I don't know what I'd say about it. The State Street Building, perhaps. 111 Huntington says a lot about what was going on in the city during that time - the mayor was able to get them to put a crown on its top. So, that building represents a time when government was in charge, when they reasserted control over the development process.
The 2000-2010 years will show no construction of any significance being built, due to the recession. Or, instead, I might have it be a residential tower, like the Clarendon. Unlike the other projects, that are all offices / government, the Clarendon is residential. A significant change in the city, a high-rised condo / apartment building in the middle of the city. That's important.
Other buildings include 28 State Street, 75 State Street, Exchange Place, First National Bank of Boston building, IP I or II, 125 High Street, the Federal Reserve.
Any suggestions, please don't hesitate to throw them out there.
Again, I'm going to pick one or two buildings from each decade and talk about how they reflect what was happening in the city at the same time. But, clever and interesting.
So, no "Charles River Park" represented the city giving up and destroying a run-down neighborhood so it could build housing for the 1%". Something more educated.
Thanks.
So, in the 1960's, it was the second decade of urban renewal. Scollay Square was torn down and Government Center went up. Government Center has a special significance because of what it represents about what the city was going through at the time. Renewal. Destruction. Class / Race relations. National and World events.
The 1950's, nothing came to mind but I might use the first John Hancock Tower, constructed 1947, with the idea that insurance companies carried the city through while it was deteriorated. Or, maybe Mass Mutual, since they had the first mutual fund in the state (beating Fidelity, I believe).
I don't want to b cliched, though. Don't want to use the Hancock, because I don't know what I'd say about it. The State Street Building, perhaps. 111 Huntington says a lot about what was going on in the city during that time - the mayor was able to get them to put a crown on its top. So, that building represents a time when government was in charge, when they reasserted control over the development process.
The 2000-2010 years will show no construction of any significance being built, due to the recession. Or, instead, I might have it be a residential tower, like the Clarendon. Unlike the other projects, that are all offices / government, the Clarendon is residential. A significant change in the city, a high-rised condo / apartment building in the middle of the city. That's important.
Other buildings include 28 State Street, 75 State Street, Exchange Place, First National Bank of Boston building, IP I or II, 125 High Street, the Federal Reserve.
Any suggestions, please don't hesitate to throw them out there.
Again, I'm going to pick one or two buildings from each decade and talk about how they reflect what was happening in the city at the same time. But, clever and interesting.
So, no "Charles River Park" represented the city giving up and destroying a run-down neighborhood so it could build housing for the 1%". Something more educated.
Thanks.