Commonwealth Avenue Improvement Project

Thank you kz! The 1928 map seems to show vacant subdivided house lots, rather than a park, on the north side of Back Street? I can't imagine how anyone thought Back Street would be a suitable place for the front of a house (facing the back of another house).

I lived at 111 Bay State Road for four years as an MIT student, but never really learned about the neighborhood's history.
 
Thank you kz! The 1928 map seems to show vacant subdivided house lots, rather than a park, on the north side of Back Street? I can't imagine how anyone thought Back Street would be a suitable place for the front of a house (facing the back of another house).
Maybe the coolest street in all of Boston:

img4567nj3.jpg

Happy Holidays!

442193497_5ALBJ-L-1.jpg

.
 
However, the backs of the Bay State Road houses are set back much further from Back Street than that. Instead of wooden fences or brick walls, a Back Street house would be looking at driveways and dumpsters.
 
^ I don't think they were thinking of driveways and dumpsters when they came up with the Back Street plan, Ron. I think they were thinking it would turn out like the "coolest street."
 
What's the deal with Lawrence St., historically? Afterthought?

The continuous flat-front facade with the various window variations makes for some interesting telephoto shots.
 
BU Today
BU Goes to the Center of the Earth
Geothermal system to heat Comm Ave building
By Vicky Waltz
The redevelopment of 882 through 888 Commonwealth Avenue includes a geothermal heating and cooling system, the first to exist at Boston University. Rendering provided by ZVI Construction Co.
Twelve years ago, the Brookline Historical Society declared the former Fellsway Motor Mart, with its intricate stone arches and large-windowed storefront, the most historic structure along Boston?s Auto Mile, a stretch of road between the BU Bridge and Packard?s Corner that was dominated by more than 100 automobile dealerships in the 1920s. Today the building, at 882 through 888 Commonwealth Ave., which currently houses the Kidney Center, is making history again by becoming Boston University?s first geothermal building.

?Geothermal systems make up only about 1 percent of heating and cooling systems throughout the country,? says Michael Difabio, the University?s associate vice president for property acquisition. ?As a general rule, we?re always looking into whatever energy-saving methods we can employ in the redevelopment of our buildings, and we?re very excited to bring such a unique practice to the Charles River Campus.?

Derived from the Greek words geo (Earth) and therme (heat), geothermal energy is literally heat that comes from the Earth. ?We?re drilling deep into the ground to harness the Earth?s natural energy,? says Patrick Watson-Hogan, president of ZVI Construction Co., which managed the construction of the project.

Last spring, construction workers drilled a series of six wells 1,500 feet deep ? that?s twice as high as the John Hancock building ? and 6 inches wide into the land adjacent to the building. Using well water as a medium, the system draws upon the Earth?s energy to warm the water to a constant temperature of approximately 55 degrees, Watson-Hogan explains, and then pumps the water out of the wells and into a heat exchanger. The heat pumps work similarly to a refrigerator, using a compressor to discharge heat.

During the winter, the heat exchanger removes heat from the water and pressurizes the heat to raise its temperature, thereby warming the building. In the summer, the heat exchanger absorbs the excess heat from the air, blows the newly cooled air back into the building, and discharges the heat into the Earth. ?Think of it as a pool of energy that is constant and not affected by atmospheric temperatures because it?s so far below the Earth?s surface,? Watson-Hogan says.

Geothermal systems are rare ? only a handful exist in the Boston area, including one at Trinity Church in Copley Square and another at the Fessenden School in Newton ? but the technique dates back to the beginning of the 20th century, when Prince Piero Ginori Conti introduced the first geothermal power generator in 1904, in Italy. The first geothermal power plant in the United States appeared in 1921 at The Geysers Resort Hotel in Northern California. Although the practice languished during the latter half of the 20th century, recent improvements in materials, equipment, and installation procedures have made the system more viable, Watson-Hogan says.

While the initial cost of installing a geothermal system is higher than conventional heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, Difabio expects the project to pay for itself within the first seven to nine years. The University opted for geothermal wells over other energy-saving methods, such as solar panels and wind turbines, he says, because ?the geothermal system is the most reliable.?

Because they require no dependence on fossil fuels or natural gas, geothermal systems are highly energy-efficient, according to Watson-Hogan. ?And because you?re not burning anything, the maintenance and operation costs are significantly lower, and the process is much cleaner and quieter,? he says. ?Your largest piece of equipment is the size of a conference room table, so there?s no need for a boiler room.? In fact, he adds, roof gardens are planned in place of the standard HVAC roof equipment.

One drawback of the geothermal process is that the pumps operate on electricity, Difabio says, but they do use less than comparable natural gas and fossil fuel systems.

Most geothermal projects require either building an entirely new structure or redeveloping an existing one from the ground up, Watson-Hogan says. The Fellsway Motor Mart building was an ideal candidate for a geothermal system because it involved the addition of a second and third floor, as well as interior loading space. When completed, the 95,000-square-foot structure will accommodate, along with the Kidney Center, the University?s Center for English Language and Orientation Programs classrooms, the International Programs offices, and several retail shops and restaurants.

Vicky Waltz can be reached at vwaltz@bu.edu.
 
I was looking at the first posts in this thread, and it only just hit me how many beautiful, large trees were cut for this project....(CAP)

Anyway, Kenmore Square

IMG_7773.jpg



Why cant the parking people and the road people work together?
IMG_7774.jpg


IMG_7775.jpg
 
Not sure I understand your last question. Are these bad places for bicycle racks?
 
Work in Brighton is gearing up:

img8034lue.jpg


img8035u.jpg

Hey, you're right in front of my old apartment. Love that building across Washington (not shown). Diner/Pizza/Chinese Food/Convenience Store all together. Hope they are all still there.
 
Any renders or plans for the brighton work?

Also, look what popped up in Kenmore:

IMG_8394.jpg


Enough bike racks to hold a convention!



Im excited, public construction season has begun. The mass ave - kenmore bike lanes should be going in soon.
 
It appears they've installed ugly, LA-style overhead street signs as well.
 
It appears they've installed ugly, LA-style overhead street signs as well.

Go back a few pages/months.

Everybody loves the signs and they should be installed everywhere.
 
Next stop: All aboard

5 years and $48m later, Kenmore Square's transportation depot nearing completion
By David Abel
Globe Staff / April 5, 2009

It has taken 175,000 pounds of steel, a combined 23,000 square feet of glass and granite, and about 300 workers nearly five years of labor.

It also has taken more than twice as long as planners had expected, 50 percent more money than originally budgeted, and immeasurable patience on the part of commuters, neighbors, and local business owners, who watched as one of the city's most vital neighborhoods seemed to become an eternal construction zone.

Now, after multiple halts and starts, after lawsuits and neighbors' wrangling, after constant changes pushed the price up to nearly $50 million, the end of construction for the transportation depot in Kenmore Square is in sight.

"It has been excruciatingly difficult to get to this point, and it's taken a ridiculous amount of time, but if you live long enough, anything can happen," said Terri North, president of the Kenmore Residents Group, who has lived for 37 years in an apartment overlooking the square.

Was it worth the trouble?

"That's a tough question to answer," she said. "There were days I would have said it wasn't. But now that we can see plants growing and all the progress, we're thrilled to be at the end, and yes, I think it was worth it."

The fruit of the labor includes a swooping glass canopy in the heart of the square; widened brick sidewalks and paved walkways across the streets; scores of new trees and street lights; and three new elevators and three new escalators, all designed to accommodate the disabled. (Two of the elevators are among the projects yet to be completed. Everything should be completed by the end of the year.)

Less visible improvements include 17 video cameras for public safety, an 8-inch rise in the subway platform to make it easier for those using wheelchairs, a new communications room to better coordinate service among the station's three train lines and five bus lines, and everything from more lighting and new emergency exits to subterranean hose hookups for the fire department.

"We did all this while servicing more than 10,000 commuters who use the station every day," said Charlie O'Reilly, the MBTA's assistant general manager for design and construction, who has overseen the project. "We know it has been hard on them, but now that the project is substantially complete, we believe they will see that the new conveniences were worth it."

The project may seem older than it is, perhaps because city and T officials first began planning to renovate the timeworn square in 1998. The initial goal was to knock down the 1960s-era brick bus shelter and make the station compliant with federal laws that require access for those with disabilities. The project later grew to incorporate changes to the roads and sidewalks and other beautification efforts.

T officials had originally planned to start construction in 2002 and had been quoted in news stories saying they would finish by 2004. But design changes, delays in the permitting process, and financial obstacles pushed back the start date. The project was finally put out to bid in late 2004, broke ground in early 2005, and planners then expected the construction to finish by the start of 2007.
Discuss
COMMENTS (13)

Then, work slowed when contractors discovered scores of undocumented utility lines that had to be moved. Increased traffic from Red Sox fans buoyed by the team's successes since the 2004 World Series win has also impeded work progress.

Engineers learned that the metal fasteners used to attach the glass panels of the new bus shelter weren't strong enough to survive the square's strong winds - a glitch that delayed the project for several months.

Another factor was the T's decision to settle a lawsuit with groups representing people with disabilities. The agreement forced the T to spend $310 million to make the train and bus system more accessible for disabled riders, requiring major changes in the Kenmore plans.

"The changes translated into delays," said John McCormack, the project's chief engineer. "It would have been nice to be able to do this job according to the original plan. But that's a fantasy. There are always changes."

While the square is no longer covered with cranes and concrete trucks, the work is still not done.

Dirt piles still sit where grass and planters are planned. An old, rusting wind shelter remains bolted beneath the new glass canopy. Elevator shafts are empty and covered with scaffolding. Walls still have to be painted, there are lights left to be installed, maps must be updated, and new signs are needed to replace the fraying pieces of paper now used to direct commuters.

Pam Beale, president of the Kenmore Association, which includes more than 50 local businesses, has suffered with the rest of them, as she watched business at her restaurant, Cornwall's, slow during the long years of construction. She has heard all the complaints, and made many of her own.

"There's been a lot of bumps and scrapes along the way," she said. "If we knew what it entailed from the beginning, we might have handled it differently. But when you look out there now, it was really worth it. The square needed to be completely reworked."

Some businesses are already noticing the difference.

Diane Hanson, manager of The Wine Gallery, said her store is attracting residents who live on the other side of the square but never knew her store existed.

"The square's brighter now, there's more foot traffic, and people are more willing to cross the street," she said. "Until now, this felt like being in the gulag."

Others aren't as sure the benefits outweigh the costs.

Leah Eckelberger, owner of Jean Therapy, started her lease five years ago, under the impression the work would be finished in two years. "This has basically been a pit since then - that, and a parking lot for all the construction workers," she said. "Aside from the improved sidewalks, I don't see how this is any better than it was before."

Lisa Gosling, manager of a local Century Bank branch, is just content she no longer has to play chicken crossing Beacon Street, but she's less thrilled about one of the new elevators, which blocks her window.

And like a lot of others who live and work in the square, she remains skeptical the project is really finished.

"It's getting there," she said. "But they keep saying that it will be done soon. I hope soon means now."

Link
 
a new communications room to better coordinate service among the station's three train lines and five bus lines

Anybody here know if we'll actually see measurable improvement?

That would be a small victory.
 

Back
Top