Copley Square Revamp | Back Bay

DBM said:
Post Office Square also is a privately-owned, privately-maintained park, and thus has been cleaned vigorously and expertly by a professional, salaried staff, since its inception. Thus I definitely would not use it as a comp here...
Click to expand...
Maybe it's not a fair comparison, but shouldn't it be? Historically, Boston has very much been a city committed to and justly proud about public civic amenities. Copley Square is a jewel and should be treated with the same level of care as Post Office Square.

I do think it fails as a comparison for other reasons, though, primarily because the two squares serve a very different purpose. Post Office Square is not a place for large gatherings, festivals, markets, etc. It doesn't need to serve as a plaza, so it works well as a grassy park. But Copley Square absolutely needs a lot of paved surface area.
 
HenryAlan said:
Copley Square is a jewel and should be treated with the same level of care as Post Office Square.
Click to expand...
I am not sure that our millionaires and billionaires want to pay the amount of taxes required to have two (or more) public spaces that are treated as well as Post Office Square private park.
 
as02143 said:
I am not sure that our millionaires and billionaires want to pay the amount of taxes required to have two (or more) public spaces that are treated as well as Post Office Square private park.
Click to expand...
What an absolutely ridiculous statement. Who do you think maintains all the private parks in Boston? In New York City, where the most notable parks in Manhattan are run by private foundations?

If funding parks well led to a notable increase in taxes, we'd be in a serious hole of financial mismanagement. As it is, even the 40M redo of Copley square amounts to....50$ per resident.
 
We saw our local billionaires and millionaires get a state elected to try to conduct a political hit on our mayor for daring to increase the commercial rates to prevent worse residential tax hikes.
 
Right, because breaking the state limit for how hard you can tax commercial property *during a commercial property downturn* is good public finance for a city. And pray tell, why should residents get a property tax break? Last I checked property owners are pretty well off?

No matter one's political views, sound public finance should be a given. The ignorance with which it's treated on the right and left does no one any good. The sewer socialists understood this in the '20s. I don't see any reason we cannot today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top