stellarfun
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 5,490
- Reaction score
- 1,121
The $900,000 per unit in San Francisco
From a NY Times reporter who writes on economic matters from California.
From a NY Times reporter who writes on economic matters from California.
^^^ There is no article, per se; this is more of a blog-type entry in a daily NY Times section on California....
You can’t talk about costs without getting into politics. Environmental rules, union wages, fees that help fund schools: These are the sorts of priorities that any attempt to reduce construction costs will run into.
Readers wanted to know how those costs got so high and what is behind it. The details are complicated, but the answer is pretty straightforward: Everything is behind it. Material costs are going up, land costs are going up, labor costs are going up. Add that to all the regulatory hurdles and developer impact fees — which in California are about three times the national average
...the building sector is about as efficient today as it was 50 years ago. To combat this, a number of developers are trying — with mixed success — to build modular housing that can be stacked like Legos, figuring that if they can move a large chunk of the construction process indoors to an assembly line, they can drastically lower the cost.
The more it costs to build, the more subsidy it requires to make units affordable. The more subsidy it requires, the fewer people are served by it.