Detroit

JohnAKeith

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2008
Messages
4,320
Reaction score
63
Whyyy?

Michigan Will Take Over Detroit
Henry Grabar, The Atlantic Cities

The other shoe has dropped: the Detroit city government will be forced to cede its authority to an emergency manager chosen by Michigan Governor Rick Snyder.

"I believe it's important to declare the city of Detroit in financial emergency," Snyder announced at a midday press conference on Friday, in front of the banner, "Detroit Can't Wait." The EM will assume the suspended powers of the mayor and city council, and will take unilateral control of municipal finances, union contracts, pension systems, and more.

The consolidation of power will likely lead to cuts and asset sales that the mayor and city council had sought to avoid, which could include the privatization of most of the city's water supply or the sale of Belle Isle Park. The EM also has the power to declare the city bankrupt, though that option seems unlikely.

The process has racial and political overtones. Detroit is over 80 percent black and its city government is controlled by Democrats; the Michigan statehouse is largely white and firmly in Republican control. If an EM is appointed in nearby Inkster (pop. 25,000, currently under a "consent agreement" with the state), as Chris Savage has pointed out, more than half of Michigan's 1.4 million African Americans will be governed by unelected officials.

Snyder's decision follows last week's devastating report from a state review team that Detroit is unable to address its long-term financial problems. The Motor City, the investigation found, has $14.9 billion in long-term debt and pension obligations, and its general fund has not shown a surplus since 2004. The review team unanimously recommended state intervention.

Members of the Detroit City Council are considering suing to fight Snyder's appointment, and they have ten days to appeal the decision. Some Detroit mayoral candidates have also contested the report, saying the figures are misleading and exaggerate the depth of the problem. Neither the mayor nor any members of the city council attended Friday's press conference.

For the past decade, as the city of Detroit struggled to balance the books, the specter of a state takeover -- and the accompanying loss of self-governance -- has loomed nearer. Detroit Mayor Dave Bing, along with other city leaders, has repeatedly implored Governor Snyder to let the city handle its own crisis. The president of the Detroit branch of the NAACP also voiced opposition to the takeover, saying that it was unrealistic to think that an emergency manager could, in a projected stint of 18 to 24 months, solve problems that have developed over a half-century and longer.

Fifty years ago, Detroit was the fifth-largest city in the United States. Like many manufacturing centers, it was hit hard by the loss of industry, white flight and declining property values. But in the first decade of the millennium, as many American cities rebounded from or stalled the decline of the late 20th century, Detroit lost a quarter of its population, further exacerbating its budget crisis.

According to Governor Snyder, the situation is now beyond the reach of city politicians. "There is no city that is more financially challenged in the entire United States," Snyder said. The governor mentioned that he had a "top candidate" for the job of emergency manager but would not offer details on that person's background.

The policy of appointing emergency managers has been highly controversial. On Election Day, Michiganders voted to repeal the state's most recent emergency manager law; 52 days later, Snyder signed a new EM law passed by the lame-duck legislature.

Several cities in Michigan, including Flint and Pontiac, have undergone multiple distinct periods of emergency management. Supporters of the policy say this recidivism demonstrates the ineptitude of city governments; opponents believe that short-sighted EM policies, with their focus on quickly eliminating debt, cripple city infrastructure and services in the long-term, leaving communities poorly prepared to recover.

Five other cities in Michigan are also under state control. Detroit will be the largest city in the country to lose the ability to govern itself.
 
Michigan has some strange state laws that allow this kind of power grab to be done very easily*.
 
Last edited:
Massachusetts took over the city government of Chelsea for several years after it nearly went bankrupt.
 
Well ... I kind of left my post open to interpretation, but more I'm wondering about how did Detroit fall so far. There's a case study here. Or, it was inevitable.

While many US cities rebounded, this one did not.

From this, doctoral theses can be written.
 
My initial take is: over-dependence on a single industry which did not respond in a timely and smart way to growing foreign competition.

(but why didn't they adapt and find new industry, like Pittsburgh did?)
 
Well ... I kind of left my post open to interpretation, but more I'm wondering about how did Detroit fall so far. There's a case study here. Or, it was inevitable.

While many US cities rebounded, this one did not.

From this, doctoral theses can be written.

They actually have been written. I've read one sent to me by a friend a few years back.
 
No real surprise here. Officials have had decades to try and turn this around. What have they been doing? Either all the wrong things or not enough of the right things. Then they turn into outraged crybabies when the steering wheel is taken from them. So tired of the twisting of everything into racial injustice. Everyone grow up already.
 
Oh, Detroit....you've fallen so far, but the bottom isn't even in sight yet.
 
Or is this the way back? Receivership turned Chelsea around.
 
They should seize the opportunity to experiment and remove all economic regulation from the city of Detroit (would require legislation both on State and Federal level, I imagine). See what happens. I mean, what's the worst that could happen at this point?

This will never happen though, because the powers-that-be know it will be too awesome. For more, see my signature.
 
No minimum wage? No overtime rules? No safety regulations? No pollution controls? A little bit of China right here in America?
 
No minimum wage?

More jobs. Better for youth, less experienced, those without skills, disabled, etc.

No overtime rules?

Work however many hours you want. If you want more than 40 hours, you got it. As it is, I can't work more than 40 at any of the part time jobs I've ever had, because they don't want to pay for it.

No safety regulations?

Population control.

Kidding...

I think people expect things to suddenly revert to 1910 for no reason. I'm not going to delve into detail here, maybe someone who can elaborate better will pick up my slack.

No pollution controls?

No EPA, either. Which means you can sue someone who is directly harming you or your property. That factory is causing cancer? They better have signed some sort of disclosure and agreement with you, or their ass is yours.

A little bit of China right here in America?

I'm not recommending fascist policies.
 
Or is this the way back? Receivership turned Chelsea around.

Things are better but it depends on your definition of turn around. Their recently convicted former housing director has set a new benchmark for crooked MA politicians. Who knows how many other greedy roaches have yet to be pulled out of the woodwork.
 

Back
Top