Are these quantities of fine actually meaningfully punitive for Keolis? Or will they probably just eat the cost and carry on?A T spokesperson said Thursday that the MBTA has imposed $51,541 in fines against Keolis for the disruptions so far.
Fair enough, I was mostly reacting to #1. And yes, anecdotally it seems like weekday delays are quite common.To be clear, there are two issues at hand:
#2 is what I'm more concerned about, and what I implied in my original comment (despite the news article at hand focusing more on #1).
- Staffing issues on weekends that caused trips to be canceled, heavily delayed (1+ hours) or converted to shuttles unexpectedly. These incidents are getting more media attention, understandably so for their disruptiveness.
- "Regular" delays on the Old Colony line that are not limited to weekends. In fact, it may be happening on most (if not all) days, affecting multiple Old Colony lines.
While I haven't been following CR on-time performance closely, I had checked the MBTA alerts section 3-5 times during daytime since SCR opened... And almost every time, at least one Old Colony line was showing a 15-20 min delay at least.
Fair points all around. I do think I stand by my point below:I wasn't implying the worst-case scenario of discontinuing SCR service and ripping the stations apart completely (although Watertown and Arborway branches did happen). The operational costs are probably manageable, even in the long term. But to me, "not investing more" would mean:
And, as F-Line said, a very real possibility is reducing service levels on Old Colony lines. While arguably less likely, it's still very plausible even if not inevitable, and its operational and political effects would be very bad.
- Not building Phase 2
- Not double-tracking the Old Colony line (yes, I know the T is starting some planning for it, but low ridership would be a good excuse to be rejected funding)
- Or both
(Keep in mind, there was already some noise from Greenbush and Kingston riders whose schedules got shuffled due to SCR, making previously well-times commute trips less convenient.)
As long as the tracks are there (and certainly as long as the service operates), it won't be that Phase 2/OCR Double Track doesn't happen -- it will be that it hasn't happened yet. (Is this a distinction without a difference? Quite possibly, I grant.)My point is that the simple presence of the line creates a gravitational pull that biases things in favor of keeping the trains running. And as long as there are trains running, there will be incentive to recoup those costs by finding some way to generate revenue, which in turn, under the right political climate, will create incentive for further investment.