Reading the article it does sound like theyre going to demolish the building when they talk about connecting the streets better. But since they dont say it outright it has me nervous. They talk about adding ground floor retail, a tower that “was in the original plan”, and adding pass through streets. This could mean they throw a tower in the courtyard, punch out a few walls for a couple cross streets, and add some ground floor retail. It wouldnt be too far off from that abomination of a render that came out before. I wish they would just come out and say directly “this building is going to be demolished” or “this building is going to be reused in some capacity”. Trying to read between the lines just makes it seem like theyre deflecting from the fact that they may try to save this trash can of a building. They need to just spell it out that way people can make their case for what should go here.