bigpicture7
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 3,906
- Reaction score
- 9,545
Perfection is, and always has been, a relative concept my friend...Exactly! It's perfect!!

Perfection is, and always has been, a relative concept my friend...Exactly! It's perfect!!
I kind of do. I don't like the building in this location, but I do think the design is spectacular. I don't know if there is a way to save some of it while hitting the urbanist goals that are vastly more important, but if there is a way, I'd like some of it to be preserved.Does one person on this forum agree with this at all? Because if this claim has ANY truth to it, the proof is here.
A mix of low, medium and high rise would mitigate that kind of potential mundane look. Plus a mix of commercial, office, and residential on small blocks and small streets would do it.![]()
Progress!
![]()
Progress!
Wait, are people actually criticizing this photo? It's a photo of high-density urban housing, minimal automobile traffic, and people using a bike lane and enjoying a meal outdoors.A mix of low, medium and high rise would mitigate that kind of potential mundane look. Plus a mix of commercial, office, and residential on small blocks and small streets would do it.
Wait, are people actually criticizing this photo? It's a photo of high-density urban housing, minimal automobile traffic, and people using a bike lane and enjoying a meal outdoors.It's an A- street scene. The only drawbacks I see is the uniform building height and the
To me its about an A-, only because of the uniform building height and the landscaped setback on the right.![]()
Progress!
My point above was that it is "relative perfection" with respect to the Central Artery that stood exactly thereTo me its about an A-, only because of the uniform building height and the landscaped setback on the right.