Keeping track of Patrick's promises.

Joe_Schmoe

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
374
Reaction score
0
I was thinking of starting a thread to keep track of Patrick's promises so we can check them off as he keeps or breaks them. Here's a list I've come up with:

Add 1000 new police officers (broken)

Cut the Property Tax (broken)

Restore local aid to pre-2000 levels

Give excise and sales tax credits for consumer purchases of energy efficient cars and appliances

Repair sewers and storm drains, and modernize our water infrastructure

Increase resources to run the state's clean-up program for toxic substances

Invest in high quality, public transportation

Increase funding to protect and manage natural areas and open space

Replace our state auto fleet with hybrids or other fuel-efficient vehicles

Invest in workforce development and training, brownfields redevelopment, and cultural facilities

Provide wireless Internet access from anywhere in the State

Provide free, full-day Kindergarten programs for all 5-year-olds in Massachusetts

Fund extended school day initiatives, including additional compensation to teachers and other professionals,

Reduce class sizes

Expand professional development programs for teachers

Invest in expansion and development of public colleges and universities

Invest in the maintenance and construction of public housing

End homelessness
 
give me a break, would ya, Im a busy guy, Ill get to your laundry list of problems when I have a free minute :lol:
 
BOSTON: Gov. Patrick says casinos are under consideration
Gov. Deval Patrick said on Saturday that he's considering casino gambling and allowing communities to impose new, local taxes as ways to reduce a state budget deficit he has projected at $1 billion.
Patrick, speaking to city and town officials at the Massachusetts Municipal Association's annual meeting, said he has misgivings about the social costs associated with allowing casino and slot machines, especially to the state's poorest residents.
But he said he has not yet decided whether the negative aspects of gambling outweighed the potential economic benefits.
Gambling is a perennially divisive issue on Beacon Hill, with the Democratic-controlled Legislature last year killing a bill to add slot machines at state racetracks.
Allowing slot machines likely would open the door to full-blown casino gambling by federally recognized Indian tribes in Massachusetts.
The Mashpee Wampanoag tribe has preliminary federal recognition, and is expected to get a final determination by March 31.
A separate group, the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head-Aquinnah on Martha's Vineyard, has been the only federally recognized Massachusetts tribe.
- From news service reports
 
Hmm, they should try out slot machines at racetracks for a given period, say a fiscal year, and reflect on the results before making any permanent decision.
 
palindrome said:
Hmm, they should try out slot machines at racetracks for a given period, say a fiscal year, and reflect on the results before making any permanent decision.

They should. My uncle actually marched into DiMasi's office and bitched him out after having been one of his biggest contributors and supporters on his campaign promise to legalize the slot machines. I'm not quite as enthusiastic as him about the issue, but I can't see why we shouldn't allow it.
 
I have no problem with casinos in Massachusetts, specifically Boston. Why let Connecticut eat our lunch like NH does with other things? Our citizens already gamble so we currently have to deal with its drawbacks like addiction without getting any of the money or tourists.

Years ago there was no lottery but there has always been a 'street' pool that has lasted to this day. I see no real difference in social cost between a lottery, horse racing or a casino.
 
The Globe said:
Patrick Aims to Speed Building Projects


Goal is to lure firms and foster expansion
By Robert Weisman, Globe Staff | January 24, 2007

Governor Deval Patrick yesterday said he is moving forward with a plan to enable "one-stop shopping" for businesses seeking permits and regulatory approvals to expand in Massachusetts, as the state's first permitting ombudsman prepares to take up his office next week.

The goal of permitting ombudsman Gregory P. Bialecki , 46, will be to reduce approval time to six months. It now takes between two and three years from the time businesses apply for their permits to the time they break ground on new buildings, said Bialecki, a real estate lawyer who is leaving the firm of DLA Piper for the post.

The job was created by the Legislature last summer as part of a law to speed review of development projects. Accelerating that process, a frequent theme of Patrick's campaign for governor, is seen as a competitive issue, especially in the state's efforts to retain and attract leading-edge technology and life sciences companies.

"Massachusetts wants you," the governor told about 400 people at the annual meeting of the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council in Boston's Copley Marriott hotel yesterday. "We want your companies, we want your expansion, we want your growth."

In his keynote address to the council, Patrick said he recognizes that Massachusetts high-tech executives looking to expand their operations are being wooed by other states that have worked to streamline their own permitting processes. To counter these overtures, "we will move at the speed of business," the governor promised.

Patrick also said he would "model" on Beacon Hill best practices from the state's technology industry. On the state government website, www.mass.gov, he said, he will begin weekly podcasts to address issues of the week, and eventually set up a weblog to allow Massachusetts residents to weigh in on public policies. He said he is also considering legislation, backed by technology leaders, to make it easier to prosecute the senders of computer viruses in the state.

But in the early weeks of the Patrick administration, the focus is on the permitting and approval process. "Right now there's a feeling that, for businesses or developers who are proposing projects, there's nowhere they can go to find someone who can help them understand the process and work their way through it," Bialecki lamented.

Bialecki will report to Dan O'Connell , the secretary of housing and economic development.

In his new job, Bialecki said he would coordinate or assist companies in securing up to eight to 10 permits from state and municipal agencies. These include, among others, environmental, sewer connector, air quality, traffic, and brownfield permits from the state, along with building permits, site plans, subdivision approvals, and conservation permits from cities or towns. Other states, like North Carolina and Texas, already have streamlined their permitting.

"We're catching up, there's no question," Bialecki said.

He said the state will start keeping track of how much time elapses once companies file for permits, and may post monthly updates on the state website. "When you come in seeking your permit, we start the clock," Bialecki said.

He said he'll also work to help cities and towns accelerate their permitting, using state funds in some cases to upgrade infrastructure or provide technical assistance in handling permits.

Bialecki said he'll make recommendations to Patrick and O'Connell on how to break bottlenecks in the process.

And he'll benchmark Massachusetts against other states that compete for technology and life sciences businesses. "As far as I'm concerned, we will borrow and copy other people's good ideas shamelessly," he said.

The new permitting push was welcomed yesterday by David I. Begelfer , the chief executive of the Massachusetts chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties.

"This is critical," he said. "Many local companies have had great difficulty figuring out if the state is even with them on this. We clearly need someone at the governor's office who understands the problem of time being a killer."

But Kristina Egan , the director of the Massachusetts Smart Growth Alliance, a coalition of housing, environmental, and economic development groups, said it is important that streamlining the permitting process not compromise the environment.

"We don't want to see wetlands regulations or other regulations bulldozed over," she said.

Meeting with reporters after speaking to the council, Patrick said he will seek to attract out-of-state companies to expand in Massachusetts. But he said his priority will be to ensure that companies already based here feel comfortable expanding in the state.

"One thing I learned in the course of the campaign is there's too little love companies here feel from the government," he said.

Robert Weisman can be reached at weisman@globe.com.
? Copyright 2007 Globe Newspaper Company.
 
Well, what does everyone think of Patrick at this point?

72,000 secretary for his wife?
46,000 for a cadillac?
27,000 for his office?

All while we are facing a 1,000,000,000 deficit :?:
 
palindrome said:
Well, what does everyone think of Patrick at this point?

72,000 secretary for his wife?
46,000 for a cadillac?
27,000 for his office?

All while we are facing a 1,000,000,000 deficit :?:

For everything else, there's Mastercard.
 
If he'd have said ANYTHING up to this point about a policy or something concerning his upcoming budget, then the media would have something to report on other than this stuff, which I think we can all agree upon is a wee bit trivial (but still highly symbolic). But instead he's hiding out and being as mum as possible.. not smart.

Plus, exactly when was it that Patrick decided to pay for some of the items personally - before or after the media blew the whistle? And what does that say about his trustworthiness?
 
I really liked Deval, I supported him with my time and a max donation after the SS Tom Reilly sank. I happily attended three inaugural events, the MFA, BCEC, and the UMass-Dartmouth event, so it isn't as if I wasn't invested. I was chill with the cadillac, honestly, he is the governor, they drive shrub around in one and deval is an infinitely better man even with his recent shortcomings. The furniture was all fine and dandy if he had paid in the first place, $27,000 goes surprisingly quickly when it comes to fine office appointments. What busts my hump is the recent $72,000 appointment. I know the Gorins, I will not speak ill of them, they are fantastic people whom I hold in very high regard, but the position is unnecessary. Diane Patrick is a partner with Ropes & Gray, she has her own entourage of executive assistants, paralegals, associates, etc. The occasional globe interview could easily be scheduled through them.

As for policy, what I have seen thus far is completely unexpected. I thought we were getting solutions, a real slash and burn takeover, instead we have the possibility of the closure of corporate loopholes, which is not inherently bad, but becomes adverse when it forces business out. We have the most talented minds in medicine and business anywhere in the country and we are on a thin line, we need to nurture that rather than throw out silly soundbites for the progressives to cling to.
 

Back
Top