Lesley University Dorms | 1663 Mass Ave. | Cambridge

PaulC

Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
1,617
Reaction score
0
Lesley web site on new dorms:
http://www.lesley.edu/public_affairs/construction/aboutnewdorms.html



From the Cambridge Chronicle
http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/business/x1366185872/Lesley-breaks-ground-on-new-dorms
On Sept. 10, Lesley University held a ceremonially groundbreaking on two new residence halls at 1663 Mass. Ave. Joined by Cambridge Mayor E. Denise Simmons, City Manager Robert Healy, and members of a neighborhood group that worked with Lesley administrators and architects on the design, Lesley University President Joseph B. Moore praised the cooperative process between the neighborhood and the University resulting in a better facility for both.

The two residence halls are under construction at 1663 Mass. Ave. and 3 Wendell St., two adjacent parcels formerly used by Alamo Car Rental. Facing Massachusetts Avenue, two new retail spaces will span the front of the first floor of the five-story building. The second building facing Wendell Street is a wood frame three-story building designed to blend with the Victorian residences of the street. Together, the two structures will house 98 students


Art Institute:
http://www.lesley.edu/public_affairs/portersquare/aibrelocation.html
 
Last edited:
Renderings for the lazy:

DORMS AT MASS AVE. AND WENDELL

1663massavegraphic.jpg


3wendellstreetgraphic.jpg


masswend_wendellview.jpg


masswend_massview.jpg


NEW ART INSTITUTE OF BOSTON / LESLEY ART SCHOOL CAMPUS AT PORTER SQ.
(probably deserves own thread)

aib_relo.gif
 
Those Mass Ave dorms are meh at best but the Wendell one is utter crap. That is gonna look so tacky. They are forced to go with contextualism because of NIMBYs but what they (the NIMBYs) don't seem to understand is that all they will end up with is a bad watered down imitation which will end up looking worse than if the architects had gone with something more modern, or at least a different style.

Cambridge does a lot of things right (e.g. bike lanes) but they also can be pretty blind and pig-headed (e.g. this, 1 Arrow St).
 
Hmm, I think One Arrow gives that corner a sort of Jacobsian architectural variety. It's by no means worthwhile architecture in and of itself, but it works well with the street.

The Mass. Ave. dorms, by contrast, have a sort of haphazard fortresslike quality to them. Why are the windows (only) where they are? It seems strange the architects would make such an obviously self-defeatingly weak gesture toward the avant-garde.

And, yeah, the Wendell townhouses are tacky as shit, but they might at least age well. The design is much better, at least, than the similar cluster next to the Gulf station up the street (bizarrely set back like 50 feet from Mass. Ave.)
 
Neighbors help Lesley design its new dorms 10/05/08 Boston Globe

http://www.boston.com/news/educatio...6/neighbors_help_lesley_design_its_new_dorms/

Neighbors help Lesley design its new dorms
By Peter Schworm
Globe Staff / October 6, 2008
When it comes to building new dormitories, colleges and their neighbors rarely see eye to eye. So when Lesley University unveiled plans for a new residence hall on Massachusetts Avenue, the grumblings from Cambridge residents came as little surprise.


But instead of the typical town-gown tug-of-war, Lesley officials and an active group of neighbors struck an unusually collegial accord: Residents wouldn't critique the latest drafts at monthly meetings. They would help design the buildings themselves.

For the past several months, seven residents of the Agassiz neighborhood huddled with the project's architects over blueprints, hammering out details of the $13 million development, the college's first new construction in three decades.

Plans for a single building with a sprawling parking lot were scrapped, replaced by two buildings, one with commercial shops on the first floor. Its contemporary style, which neighbors felt was boxy and harsh, gave way to a layered facade more consistent with the surrounding architecture. The parking lot was cut in half and tucked between the buildings.

In exchange, the university gained neighbors' support for a larger project than initially proposed, giving Lesley coveted new dorm rooms for its growing student body. Because the new plans exceeded zoning regulations, neighbors took the unusual step of lobbying the Cambridge zoning board for a range of waivers. The board agreed to some, but, in a reversal of the norm, demanded other changes against the neighbors' wishes.

"Usually they expect neighbors to complain," neighbor Carol Weinhaus said with a chuckle. "But we wanted more."

Weinhaus said the meetings were open and productive.

"Everything was on the table and no one pulled their punches," she said.

At a recent ribbon-cutting ceremony at the small property outside Harvard Square, university officials and neighbors hailed the partnership, a sharp contrast to the ongoing tussles over expansions at Boston College, Northeastern, and Harvard.

"We all compromised," said Fred Meyer, a neighbor who was closely involved in the design process. "We supported a big zoning variance, and Lesley gave us exactly the type of building we wanted. That's what, here in Agassiz, we call a 'Win-Win.' "

Construction has begun, and the university hopes to open the five-story and three-story residence halls, which combined will hold 100 students, by next September. The project is part of a broad expansion campaign for the 1,300-student college that includes plans to pay $33 million for seven buildings at the Episcopal Divinity School on Brattle Street. The university also plans to move the Art Institute of Boston, now in Kenmore Square, to its Porter Square location.

Bill Doncaster, Lesley's director of community relations, said the university was surprised neighbors were not only willing to accept a larger project, but to spend hour after hour in meetings working to make it better.

"The level of time commitment was a surprise," Doncaster said. "It was substantial."

Simeon Bruner, the project's architect, who frequently designs college buildings, said the level of cooperation between Lesley and its neighbors was "quite odd," as was the level of neighborhood involvement.

"It was pretty different," he said. "They didn't come in and say 'We don't like it. Make it smaller.' They said, 'We don't like it. Make it bigger.' "

Bruner said neighborhood involvement caused some delays and disagreements, but the two sides resolved their differences quickly. Some residents praised his patience for putting up with their meddling.

"Can you imagine an architect having to deal with a bunch of neighbors?" Weinhaus quipped.

Bruner said the final project is superior to the original. At the same time, the university lost half their proposed parking, agreed to higher construction costs, and will probably lose money on the retail stores, Bruner said.

Lesley president Joseph B. Moore praised the neighbors' dedication and said he agreed with their resolve to have the buildings blend with the neighborhood.

"It wasn't negotiations, it was collaboration," he said. "We're not trying to build a self-enclosed campus. Mass. Ave. is our student center."

Neighbors said the extra time and energy were a small price to pay.

"My God, it's your neighborhood," said Meyer, a 70-year-old realtor who has lived in the area for decades. "If I can't do that for my neighborhood, what good am I?"

? Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company.
 
As much as I think that collaboration with neighbors is a good idea (are you listening Harvard?), I still stand by my feelings that design by committee only results in a watered down design. I guess the difference is one is planning and one is design.
 
Agreed with vans?I'm honestly not sure what's worse, the tepid design or the fact that Lesley allowed (nay, invited) seven amateurs to "design" their property.

Feedback is one thing; driving the discussion is something else entirely.

Plus, it sets a bad precedent for other universities when elected officials and NIMBYs use this as leverage.
 
Don't worry; Harvard et al have not and never will be following Lesley's lead.
 
News story from the Cambridge Chronicle

HEFA bonds fuel Lesley expansion, $14M dorm
By State House News Service
State House News Service
Posted Apr 01, 2009 @ 06:51 PM
Last update Apr 01, 2009 @ 06:56 PM

[FONT="][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=2]Cambridge ?A state authority in the news over the past two weeks in connection with now aborted attempts to hire a state senator on Wednesday announced a $57.4 million bond deal that will help Lesley University buy property in Cambridge for expansion and complete the construction of a new $14 million, 100-student residence hall. According to the Health and Education Facilities Authority, the university, which turns 100 next year, is "reshaping itself as a leading provider of online education while growing its undergraduate and graduate population of students." HEFA says that while many higher education institutions are scaling back, Lesley is eyeing expansion after tripling its endowment last year with a $136 million gift from a charitable trust established by former trustee Frank C. Doble. Proceeds from the tax-exempt financing will fund the purchases, at a total cost of $40.5 million, of seven buildings from the Episcopal Divinity School on Brattle Street and two adjacent properties and buildings from the Weston Jesuit School of Theology.

[/SIZE][/FONT] [/FONT][LEFT][FONT="]
g1a91054d42b3593782cbea3627f0a2e97a58c3706b4c9f.jpg
[/FONT]
[/LEFT]
[FONT="] [URL="http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1579109856/HEFA-bonds-fuel-Lesley-expansion-14M-dorm"]Link[/URL]
[/FONT]
 
That seems like not nearly enough upper-floor windows on the Mass. Ave. side.
 
Don't know what to think of this. The product is timid as a mouse, but the process is interesting.
 
^ Well, I believe in getting everybody happy, so at the end you have more than a zero-sum game. That can mean accommodating the whims of the community's representatives even if they're plug-ignorant.

In this case,however, the outcome I see in the rendering is so second-rate that it can only be described as mousey.

The problem is at least partly amateurs calling the shots. Would you like your car to be fixed by garage kibbitzers?
 
whatever your thoughts on the architecture, keep in mind we're going from a car rental lot to 100 dorm units and two retail spaces. that's a huge plus in my eyes.

n14100738_31401402_7587249.jpg
 
Not necessarily. A parking lot is architecture's Friday night: endless possibilities. This has the sad reality of a Monday morning, circa 1979.

(P.S. I know you are being sarcastic, and your exasperation is wonderfully palpable!)
 
Last edited:
The definition this adds to that corner is wonderful. Currently it's:

- A five-plus story apartment building
- A one-story retail building
- A four-story dormitory set back from the street by a lawn (the former Holiday Inn)

Having a building over two stories anchor another side of this corner ups the urban ante significantly. If it had been much shorter, it wouldn't have done the trick. New retail frontage doesn't hurt, either. Could have been worse than this and still better than a parking lot.
 
Is there a new mandate that all new dorm buildings have to have the appeal of Rosie O'Donnell naked?
 
Not necessarily. A parking lot is architecture's Friday night: endless possibilities. This has the sad reality of a Monday morning, circa 1979.

It could be worse. The project could have the sad reality of a Sunday morning where you wake up with a 300-pound woman in your bed. See: Northeastern Dorms.
 

Back
Top