Moscow to Double in Size

Shepard

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
3,518
Reaction score
65
Maybe someone here who knows Moscow fairly well can comment on this?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/14/moscow-double-size-overcrowding

---


Moscow to double in geographical size to ease overcrowding

Russia reveals plan for capital to absorb woodland and holiday towns but critics warn of impending environmental disaster

Traffic-eases-past-the-fo-007.jpg


Russian officials have announced plans to more than double Moscow's territory in a bid to alleviate the city's crippling traffic and overcrowding, but critics worry the move could prove to be an environmental fiasco and leave thousands displaced.

The plan to increase Moscow's size from the current 264,000 acres to 620,000 acres was given initial approval on Monday by Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's president, in a meeting with the city's mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, and Boris Gromov, governor of the surrounding Moscow region. The plan will see Moscow expanding to the south and south-west, taking in forestland, small communities and dachas or summerhouses.

It foresees much of the heart of Moscow – its government offices and big businesses – moving to the new neighbourhood, forever changing the spirit of the city's historic centre.

The first to move are due to be the offices of the prime minister and cabinet, as well as the presidential administration, Sobyanin said in a meeting with the editors of Russia's leading newspapers this week. Russian officials are looking at a 20-year timeline to complete the city's growth. They have yet to announce a budget for the venture.

The move is Moscow's boldest attempt yet to deal with the notorious bottlenecks that often bring movement in the city to a standstill. It is part of Medvedev's vision to turn Moscow into a global financial centre as the country seeks to attract investment and boost its international standing. He first floated the expansion idea during a speech to foreign investors during an international forum in St Petersburg last month.

The plan, published on the Moscow city government website, says the city's southern and south-western outskirts were chosen in part because they comprise "a relatively weakly urbanised sector of the Moscow region," counting some 250,000 people.

Alexei Yaroshenko, of Greenpeace Russia, said he believed the number was much higher. It also does not include those who maintain dachas in the region. "We don't know the exact borders yet," Yaroshenko said. "If it is moved this way or that, hundreds of thousands of people will be added."

The concern comes from precedent – locals in and around the Black Sea resort of Sochi, the site of the Winter Olympics, have protested over forced relocation as the government takes over prime real estate in the region.

Five years ago residents of Butovo, a village on the outskirts of southern Moscow, had a face off with authorities for weeks as they attempted to fight the razing of houses to make way for construction. Residents of Khimki, in northern Moscow, continue to battle controversial plans to build a road through their forest.

"They don't care at all about the people," Yaroshenko said. "The officials decide and then start to build and what people think makes no difference to them." He worried that the lush forestland in the region would be the first affected, since it is federal property.

Yet even critics like Yaroshenko admit something has to be done. Moscow's population has grown by 200,000 a year since 2002, he noted, citing census results.

Aside from the potential effects on residents and the forests that line Moscow's southern outskirts, Yaroshenko worries that the expansion – which city officials say will add housing for 2 million Muscovites and more than 1m jobs – will only increase Moscow's dominance over the country.

While preliminary results from a 2010 census showed that the overall population of the country decreased by 1.2%, Moscow's population increased from 10.4 million to 11.5 million.

"The country is emptying and Moscow is growing," he said. "All resources are going to Moscow – first money and then people follow."
 
It's laughable. I don't think anyone in Moscow takes this nonsense seriously. You have to understand that the governing structure in Russia is basically kleptocracy. This holds true at the more micro level in Moscow as well; the previous mayor, Luzhkov (who was ousted by Medvedev ~1 year ago), liked to build whatever he could, often bulldozing old structures pointlessly in order to rebuild a replica (as with the Hotel Moscow next to Red Square) or replace it with some hideous piece of garbage architecture.

What's kleptocratic in that? Well, his wife was a big developer/building materials producer. During her husband's long term as mayor, she just so happened to become Russia's only female billionaire, and Luzhkov is rumored to be worth tens of billions.

Luzhkov's biggest project was "Moscow-Citi," which is where all the skyscrapers you might have read about in breathless articles in the Guardian or the NYT were supposed to be -- the Federation Tower, the Russia Tower, the new Moscow city hall, etc. Today, Moscow-Citi is partially complete and basically frozen.

Meanwhile, Luzhkov has been ousted and replaced by Sobyanin, Putin's former chief of staff. Suddenly, talk about half-done Moscow-Citi has ceased, and Sobyanin has decided that there will be a "new zone" just outside the city, for tall buildings, government offices, and a "world financial center."

Hmm, sounds like exactly what Luzhkov was trying to do the last 20 years. In fact, they got halfway done with just that ... and now they're abandoning it to start it over from scratch?

Simultaneously -- and in an only-in-Russia way -- Sobyanin's wife is now said in the press to be a sidewalks-asphalt mogul, and apparently benefiting from new city contracts to build sidewalks. Building materials strike again.

Sure, Moscow is absorbing new landmass in the form of surrounding towns -- just as Houston or Jacksonville does. It's not that interesting. As for the new skyscraper cities? Well, there's no real reason for them. Sure, traffic is really bad in Moscow, but they basically seem to be dumping the previous mayor's half-finished project and deciding to start anew, probably for purposes of graft. I'd be surprised if this new project ever gets underway -- it's probably more of a media sideshow that will blow over, mixed perhaps with an earnest attempt by the mayor to benefit from the building contracts. So take it all with a shaker of salt.
 
Doesn't Russia have a negative population growth rate right now? Not because people are dying early, but because the birth rate is really low.
 

Back
Top