I thought the exact same thing looking at the globe comments about the mbta communities act where people were saying “this is communism!” and it blew my f’n mind. Relaxing zoning which was implemented top down by the government which tells people what they can and cant build on their own land and in its place allowing entrepreneurs and corporations to build what the free market will allow according to supply and demand is communism now? LOL! We do live in a post truth world now, but god damn.It astounds me how respecting property rights has become a hot take. (Legit) externalities that escape property lines are one thing, but how are some neighbors able to decide, on land they don’t own, that a code complaint, three decker is ‘too tall’ for the downtown of an inside-128 ‘burb? So many liberal outcomes would be achieved, at zero cost, by simply getting out of our own way.
Ad nauseam, I hear the MBTA Communities Act described as “Big Government Overreach” imposed by the state upon our tiny, freedom loving town.
Marginally reducing collective control over private property is what again???
Kind of beside the point, though. For the purposes of this law, it is defined as rapid transit.Yet, it is not
The Mattapan Line is now (officially) considered rapid transit for the purposes of the MBTA-related zoning requirements.
Milton must come up with MBTA zoning
With both sides claiming a measure of victory in the state’s highest court decision on the MBTA Communities law, the nitty gritty of what Milton and other communities will bewww.miltontimes.com
Ahem.If Milton has such a problem with the Mattapan Line being designated as "rapid transit", how about they start supporting a Red Line extension from Ashmont to Mattapan?