I understand your point, especially Meliville Towers. The tallest, Regency Tower, is actually not low income. It might be a small skyline but it's all we got here!
New England Skylines thread
- Thread starter Hubman
- Start date
I understand your point, especially Meliville Towers. The tallest, Regency Tower, is actually not low income. It might be a small skyline but it's all we got here!
Exactly. Or at least an economy that is not interested in building tall (such as small cities like Burlington).
I grew up in the Worcester area and go back a lot. I would say "non-existent" is strong, but it seems there is more demand on the 495 belt in Marlborough and Westborough. They have had Boston Scientific, BJ's and Cumberland Farms move west for new HQ's in the recent past.
Edit: WPI and UMass Medical school have added some office space near their respective schools. WPI just north of downtown and UMass on the east side of the city. Not exactly Kenmore Square but good stuff for the city. I mean not new but recent.
That comment was more directed at New Bedford and its Fall River/Lawrence/Brockton peers than Hartford/Providence/Worcester. Those three have their obvious shortcomings but don't seem nearly as badly off.
The conversation originally stemmed from "Which cities have public housing as their tallest building?" Lawrence, New Bedford, and Fall River, Brockton all have public housing among their tallest towers while Worcester, Springfield and Hartford have office towers.
Chances for Burlington to go vertical are better than anytime before. Check out this sites:
https://www.burlingtonvt.gov/CEDO/BTV-Mall-Redevelopment-Process
Plans:
https://www.burlingtonvt.gov/sites/...cuments/BTC 2017_02_16 ALL Drawings 30x42.pdf
Last edited:
Facsinating! In 10 years Burlington might overtake Springfeild!
bolehboleh
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 413
- Reaction score
- 27
I kind of hope not. It's a city of only 40,000 people, and while I do look forward to this development, tall buildings are not what make a great city. Keep it dense, but don't try to make it in to something it's not or shouldn't be.
markhb
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2013
- Messages
- 1,406
- Reaction score
- 1,193
In Portland, the tallest habitable building is public housing (mainly elder housing), while the tallest building period is the steeple on the Cathedral.
You make a good point. I'd like it to become big, but flat. If it ended up like a bigger Biddeford, ME, I'd be happy.
P
Patrick
Guest
I can't tell if this is a joke or not. Burlington obviously blows Biddeford out of the water on all fronts, but that said Biddeford had really come extremely far in recent years (some nice re-use of the inner core, which has very attractive architecture in sections). Biddeford may not become a destination anytime soon, but it appears to be shaping up to be a cool urban alternative to Portland for certain demographics. Perhaps not analogous to Lowell-Boston, but that's the best example I could think of to compare it to. Personally while I am excited by some of the renderings in Burlington (and the project by and large remains quite small scaled), I don't particularly like the design overall and would like to see something better.
No, I'm not joking. I mean like Biddeford's architecture and feel. Not it's economy.
Wow. South Portland isn't technically part of Portland though, is it?
But it borders, though, so tall buildings would fit into the skyline, sort of like how the Hancock sits far off from the High-rises in downtown.
PortlandArch
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2012
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 4
It's not as close as Back Bay to the Financial District (or if it is, it's separated by much more suburbia) so it wouldn't have the same look. It's not as though this is the part of South Portland across the harbor from Portland which appears from aerials to be part of the same city. This is out by the shopping mall and is in a very unurban area. Strange place to propose such a tall building by itself but the concept in general is a good one (more density).
Trivial fact: Portland and SoPo considered merging once, over a century ago, but something at the State Legislature level stopped it.
Trivial fact: Portland and SoPo considered merging once, over a century ago, but something at the State Legislature level stopped it.
I left out Cambridge. What does everyone think?
It would be better if Cambridge's high-rises were clustered, instead of scattered around the city. It would have a much better skyline if there weren't 50 of them squeezed into a city.
It would be better if Cambridge's high-rises were clustered, instead of scattered around the city. It would have a much better skyline if there weren't 50 of them squeezed into a city.